BitVector/SmallBitVector::reference::operator bool remain implicit since
they model more exactly a bool, rather than something else that can be
boolean tested.
The most common (non-buggy) case are where such objects are used as
return expressions in bool-returning functions or as boolean function
arguments. In those cases I've used (& added if necessary) a named
function to provide the equivalent (or sometimes negative, depending on
convenient wording) test.
One behavior change (YAMLParser) was made, though no test case is
included as I'm not sure how to reach that code path. Essentially any
comparison of llvm::yaml::document_iterators would be invalid if neither
iterator was at the end.
This helped uncover a couple of bugs in Clang - test cases provided for
those in a separate commit along with similar changes to `operator bool`
instances in Clang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181868 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rationale:
1) This was the name in the comment block. ;]
2) It matches Clang's __has_feature naming convention.
3) It matches other compiler-feature-test conventions.
Sorry for the noise. =]
I've also switch the comment block to use a \brief tag and not duplicate
the name.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168996 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While LLVM itself is still C++03, there's no reason why tools built on
top of it can't use C++11 features.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166242 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ownership over the pointer it contains. Useful when we want to
communicate ownership while still having several clients holding on to
the same pointer *without* introducing reference counting.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
