approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG
when it is a question of expanding or promoting the
result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from
a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts
the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate
two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts.
Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>,
and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to
<2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles
the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted
value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization,
and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to
be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts
too if they want to. Also, when considering various
cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is
a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize
or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it
lists those different cases - now Expand only means
splitting a scalar in two.
The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for
all relevant testcases, except for
2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems
to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell
me if it is better or not).
Before < vs after >.
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 4(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 28(%esp)
< movl (%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 24(%esp)
< movq 24(%esp), %mm0
< movq %mm0, 56(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
> movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp)
> pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movq (%esp), %mm0
> movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 12(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 28(%esp)
< movl 8(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 24(%esp)
< movq 24(%esp), %mm0
< movq %mm0, 56(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
> movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp)
> pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movq (%esp), %mm0
> movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
< movl 16(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 48(%esp)
< movl 20(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 52(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 4(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 60(%esp)
< movl (%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 56(%esp)
---
> pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movd %xmm1, 12(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
< movl 24(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 48(%esp)
< movl 28(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 52(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 12(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 60(%esp)
< movl 8(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 56(%esp)
---
> pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movd %xmm1, 12(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CodeGen/PowerPC/illegal-element-type.ll): suppose
a node X is processed, and processing maps it to
a node Y. Then X continues to exist in the DAG,
but with no users. While processing some other
node, a new node may be created that happens to
be equal to X, and thus X will be reused rather
than a truly new node. This can cause X to
"magically reappear", and since it is in the
Processed state in will not be reprocessed, so
at the end of type legalization the illegal node
X can still be present. The solution is to replace
X with Y whenever X gets resurrected like this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and splitting extract_subvector. This fixes nine
"make check" testcases, for example
2008-02-04-ExtractSubvector.ll and (partially)
CodeGen/Generic/vector.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
