float t1(int argc) {
return (argc == 1123) ? 1.234f : 2.38213f;
}
We would generate truly awful code on ARM (those with a weak stomach should look
away):
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #1
movs r3, #0
cmp r0, r1
mov.w r0, #0
it eq
moveq r0, r2
movs r1, #4
cmp r0, #0
it ne
movne r3, r1
adr r0, #LCPI1_0
ldr r0, [r0, r3]
bx lr
The problem was that legalization was creating a cascade of SELECT_CC nodes, for
for the comparison of "argc == 1123" which was fed into a SELECT node for the ?:
statement which was itself converted to a SELECT_CC node. This is because the
ARM back-end doesn't have custom lowering for SELECT nodes, so it used the
default "Expand".
I added a fairly simple "LowerSELECT" to the ARM back-end. It takes care of this
testcase, but can obviously be expanded to include more cases.
Now we generate this, which looks optimal to me:
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #0
cmp r0, r1
adr r0, #LCPI0_0
it eq
moveq r2, #4
ldr r0, [r0, r2]
bx lr
.align 2
LCPI0_0:
.long 1075344593 @ float 2.382130e+00
.long 1067316150 @ float 1.234000e+00
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@110799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove "target endian/pointersize" or add "target datalayout" to make
the test parse properly or set the datalayout because defaults changes.
For PR645:
Make global names use the @ prefix.
For llvm-upgrade changes:
Fix test cases or completely remove use of llvm-upgrade for test cases
that cannot survive the new renaming or upgrade capabilities.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@33533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
