Math functions are mark as readonly because they read the floating point
rounding mode. Because we don't vectorize loops that would contain function
calls that set the rounding mode it is safe to ignore this memory read.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Inserting a zext or trunc is sufficient. This pattern is somewhat common in
LLVM's pointer mangling code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Changing the sign when comparing the base pointer would introduce all
sorts of unexpected things like:
%gep.i = getelementptr inbounds [1 x i8]* %a, i32 0, i32 0
%gep2.i = getelementptr inbounds [1 x i8]* %b, i32 0, i32 0
%cmp.i = icmp ult i8* %gep.i, %gep2.i
%cmp.i1 = icmp ult [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp = icmp ne i1 %cmp.i, %cmp.i1
ret i1 %cmp
into:
%cmp.i = icmp slt [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp.i1 = icmp ult [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp = xor i1 %cmp.i, %cmp.i1
ret i1 %cmp
By preserving the original sign, we now get:
ret i1 false
This fixes PR16483.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185259 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Real world code sometimes has the denominator of a 'udiv' be a
'select'. LLVM can handle such cases but only when the 'select'
operands are symmetric in structure (both select operands are a constant
power of two or a left shift, etc.). This falls apart if we are dealt a
'udiv' where the code is not symetric or if the select operands lead us
to more select instructions.
Instead, we should treat the LHS and each select operand as a distinct
divide operation and try to optimize them independently. If we can
to simplify each operation, then we can replace the 'udiv' with, say, a
'lshr' that has a new select with a bunch of new operands for the
select.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We may, after other optimizations, find ourselves with IR that looks
like:
%shl = shl i32 1, %y
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %shl, 32
Instead, we should just compare the shift count:
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %y, 5
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185242 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes PR16418, which reports that a function calling
__builtin_unwind_init() asserts. The cause is that this generates a
spill/restore for VRSAVE, and we support that only on Darwin (because VRSAVE is
only really used on Darwin).
The test case checks only that we don't crash. We can add correctness checks
once someone verifies what behavior the function is supposed to have.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185235 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To support this we have to insert 'extractelement' instructions to pick the right lane.
We had this functionality before but I removed it when we moved to the multi-block design because it was too complicated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- lit tests verify that each line of input LLVM IR gets a !dbg node and a
corresponding entry of metadata that contains the line number
- unit tests verify that DebugIR works as advertised in the interface
- refactored some useful IR generation functionality from the MCJIT unit tests
so it can be reused
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On OpenBSD, the stack-smash protection transform uses "__guard_local"
and "__stack_smash_handler" instead of "__stack_chk_guard" and
"__stack_chk_fail". However, CodeGen/PowerPC/stack-protector.ll
doesn't specify a target OS, so on OpenBSD it fails.
Add -mtriple=ppc32-unknown-linux to make the test host-OS agnostic. While
there, convert to FileCheck.
Patch by Matthew Dempsky.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Based on GCC's output for TLS variables (OP_constNu, x@dtpoff,
OP_lo_user), this implements debug info support for TLS in ELF. Verified
that this output is correct/sufficient on Linux (using gold - if you're
using binutils-ld, you'll need something with the fix for
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15685 in it).
Support on non-ELF is sort of "arbitrary" at the moment - if Apple folks
want to discuss (or just go ahead & implement) how this should work in
MachO, etc, I'm open.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Under certain (evidently rare) circumstances, this code used to convert OR(a,
AND(x, y)) into OR(a, x). This was incorrect.
While there, I've added a comment to the code immediately above.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185201 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
should expand ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP nodes the same way that it does for ATOMIC_SWAP.
Since ATOMIC_LOADs on some targets (e.g. older ARM variants) get legalized to
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAPs, the missing case had been causing i64 atomic loads to crash
during isel.
<rdar://problem/14074644>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix ABI handling for function
returning bool -- use st.param.b32 to return the value
and use ld.param.b32 in caller to load the return value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185177 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch assigns paired GPRs for inline asm with
64-bit data on ARM. It's enabled for both ARM and Thumb to support modifiers
like %H, %Q, %R.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were generating intrinsics for NEON fixed-point conversions that didn't
exist (e.g. float -> i16). There are two cases to consider:
+ iN is smaller than float. In this case we can do the conversion but need an
extend or truncate as well.
+ iN is larger than float. In this case using the NEON conversion would be
incorrect so we don't perform any combining.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The mapping between SRS pseudo-instructions and SRS native instructions was incorrect, the correct mapping is:
srsfa -> srsib
srsea -> srsia
srsfd -> srsdb
srsed -> srsda
This fixes <rdar://problem/14214734>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185155 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No functionality change.
It should suffice to check the type of a debug info metadata, instead of
calling Verify. For cases where we know the type of a DI metadata, use
assert.
Also update testing cases to make them conform to the format of DI classes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
algorithm when assigning EnumValues to the synthesized registers.
The current algorithm, LessRecord, uses the StringRef compare_numeric
function. This function compares strings, while handling embedded numbers.
For example, the R600 backend registers are sorted as follows:
T1
T1_W
T1_X
T1_XYZW
T1_Y
T1_Z
T2
T2_W
T2_X
T2_XYZW
T2_Y
T2_Z
In this example, the 'scaling factor' is dEnum/dN = 6 because T0, T1, T2
have an EnumValue offset of 6 from one another. However, in other parts
of the register bank, the scaling factors are different:
dEnum/dN = 5:
KC0_128_W
KC0_128_X
KC0_128_XYZW
KC0_128_Y
KC0_128_Z
KC0_129_W
KC0_129_X
KC0_129_XYZW
KC0_129_Y
KC0_129_Z
The diff lists do not work correctly because different kinds of registers have
different 'scaling factors'. This new algorithm, LessRecordRegister, tries to
enforce a scaling factor of 1. For example, the registers are now sorted as
follows:
T1
T2
T3
...
T0_W
T1_W
T2_W
...
T0_X
T1_X
T2_X
...
KC0_128_W
KC0_129_W
KC0_130_W
...
For the Mips and R600 I see a 19% and 6% reduction in size, respectively. I
did see a few small regressions, but the differences were on the order of a
few bytes (e.g., AArch64 was 16 bytes). I suspect there will be even
greater wins for targets with larger register files.
Patch reviewed by Jakob.
rdar://14006013
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185094 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The purpose of this test was to check boundary conditions for the size
of an ALU clause. This test is very sensitive to changes to the
optimizer or scheduler, because it requires an exact number of ALU
instructions in order to remain valid. It's not good to have a test
this sensitive, because it is confusing to developers who implement
optimizations and then 'break' the test.
I'm not sure if there is a good way to test these limits using lit, but
if I can come up with replacement test that isn't as sensitive I'll add
it back to the tree.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use vectorized instruction instead of original instruction anchored in the
original loop.
Fixes PR16452 and t2075.c of PR16455.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add pseudo conditional store instructions, so that we use:
branch foo:
store
foo:
instead of:
load
branch foo:
move
foo:
store
z196 has real 32-bit and 64-bit conditional stores, but we don't use
any z196 instructions yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185065 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When we store values for reversed induction stores we must not store the
reversed value in the vectorized value map. Another instruction might use this
value.
This fixes 3 test cases of PR16455.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
