Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
b056aa798d DebugInfo: Move new hierarchy into place
Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464.  I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confident this commit is NFC as far as DWARF output is
concerned.  Let me know if I'm wrong :).

The code changes are fairly mechanical:

  - Bumped the "Debug Info Version".
  - `DIBuilder` now creates the appropriate subclass of `MDNode`.
  - Subclasses of DIDescriptor now expect to hold their "MD"
    counterparts (e.g., `DIBasicType` expects `MDBasicType`).
  - Deleted a ton of dead code in `AsmWriter.cpp` and `DebugInfo.cpp`
    for printing comments.
  - Big update to LangRef to describe the nodes in the new hierarchy.
    Feel free to make it better.

Testcase changes are enormous.  There's an accompanying clang commit on
its way.

If you have out-of-tree debug info testcases, I just broke your build.

  - `upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh` is attached to PR22564.  I used it to
    update all the IR testcases.
  - Unfortunately I failed to find way to script the updates to CHECK
    lines, so I updated all of these by hand.  This was fairly painful,
    since the old CHECKs are difficult to reason about.  That's one of
    the benefits of the new hierarchy.

This work isn't quite finished, BTW.  The `DIDescriptor` subclasses are
almost empty wrappers, but not quite: they still have loose casting
checks (see the `RETURN_FROM_RAW()` macro).  Once they're completely
gutted, I'll rename the "MD" classes to "DI" and kill the wrappers.  I
also expect to make a few schema changes now that it's easier to reason
about everything.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-03-03 17:24:31 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
37ac8d3622 IR: Move MDLocation into place
This commit moves `MDLocation`, finishing off PR21433.  There's an
accompanying clang commit for frontend testcases.  I'll attach the
testcase upgrade script I used to PR21433 to help out-of-tree
frontends/backends.

This changes the schema for `DebugLoc` and `DILocation` from:

    !{i32 3, i32 7, !7, !8}

to:

    !MDLocation(line: 3, column: 7, scope: !7, inlinedAt: !8)

Note that empty fields (line/column: 0 and inlinedAt: null) don't get
printed by the assembly writer.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226048 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-14 22:27:36 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
1ef70ff39b IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
83902832de Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString""
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash.  The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).

Original commit message follows.

--

This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
32e192aeb3 Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"
This reverts commit r218914 while I investigate some bots.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-02 22:15:31 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
0917b70630 DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218914 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-02 21:56:57 +00:00
David Blaikie
e27d5a0047 Recommit r212203: Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information.
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.

The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.

A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.

This was then reverted again in r213581 as it caused PR20367. The root
cause of this was the early exit in LiveDebugVariables meant that
spurious DBG_VALUE intrinsics that referenced dead variables were not
removed, causing an assertion/crash later on. The fix is to have
LiveDebugVariables strip all DBG_VALUE intrinsics in functions without
debug info as they're not needed anyway. Test case added to cover this
situation (that occurs when a debug-having function is inlined into a
nodebug function) in test/DebugInfo/X86/nodebug_with_debug_loc.ll

Original commit message:

If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.

While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.

Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.

Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-25 16:10:16 +00:00
David Blaikie
529165298e Revert "Recommit r212203: Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information."
This reverts commit r212649 while I investigate/reduce/etc PR20367.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-21 20:45:59 +00:00
David Blaikie
eff0c67b6a Recommit r212203: Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information.
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.

The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.

A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.

Original commit message:

If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.

While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.

Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.

Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-09 21:02:41 +00:00
Eric Christopher
3a3941576d Temporarily revert "Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information." as it appears to be breaking some LTO constructs.
This reverts commit r212203.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-03 22:24:54 +00:00
David Blaikie
f9b6d0373a Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information.
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.

While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.

Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.

Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-02 18:31:35 +00:00