//===-- Value.cpp - Implement the Value class -----------------------------===// // // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure // // This file was developed by the LLVM research group and is distributed under // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // // This file implements the Value and User classes. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "llvm/InstrTypes.h" #include "llvm/SymbolTable.h" #include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h" #include "llvm/Constant.h" #include "Support/LeakDetector.h" #include using namespace llvm; //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Value Class //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// static inline const Type *checkType(const Type *Ty) { assert(Ty && "Value defined with a null type: Error!"); return Ty; } Value::Value(const Type *ty, ValueTy vty, const std::string &name) : Name(name), Ty(checkType(ty)) { VTy = vty; } Value::~Value() { #ifndef NDEBUG // Only in -g mode... // Check to make sure that there are no uses of this value that are still // around when the value is destroyed. If there are, then we have a dangling // reference and something is wrong. This code is here to print out what is // still being referenced. The value in question should be printed as // a // if (Uses.begin() != Uses.end()) { std::cerr << "While deleting: " << *Ty << "%" << Name << "\n"; for (use_const_iterator I = Uses.begin(), E = Uses.end(); I != E; ++I) std::cerr << "Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed:" << **I << "\n"; } #endif assert(Uses.begin() == Uses.end() &&"Uses remain when a value is destroyed!"); // There should be no uses of this object anymore, remove it. LeakDetector::removeGarbageObject(this); } // uncheckedReplaceAllUsesWith - This is exactly the same as replaceAllUsesWith, // except that it doesn't have all of the asserts. The asserts fail because we // are half-way done resolving types, which causes some types to exist as two // different Type*'s at the same time. This is a sledgehammer to work around // this problem. // void Value::uncheckedReplaceAllUsesWith(Value *New) { while (!Uses.empty()) { Use &U = Uses.back(); // Must handle Constants specially, we cannot call replaceUsesOfWith on a // constant! if (Constant *C = dyn_cast(U.getUser())) { C->replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant(this, New, true); } else { U.set(New); } } } void Value::replaceAllUsesWith(Value *New) { assert(New && "Value::replaceAllUsesWith() is invalid!"); assert(New != this && "this->replaceAllUsesWith(this) is NOT valid!"); assert(New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"); uncheckedReplaceAllUsesWith(New); } //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // User Class //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// User::User(const Type *Ty, ValueTy vty, const std::string &name) : Value(Ty, vty, name) { } // replaceUsesOfWith - Replaces all references to the "From" definition with // references to the "To" definition. // void User::replaceUsesOfWith(Value *From, Value *To) { if (From == To) return; // Duh what? assert(!isa(this) && "Cannot call User::replaceUsesofWith on a constant!"); for (unsigned i = 0, E = getNumOperands(); i != E; ++i) if (getOperand(i) == From) { // Is This operand is pointing to oldval? // The side effects of this setOperand call include linking to // "To", adding "this" to the uses list of To, and // most importantly, removing "this" from the use list of "From". setOperand(i, To); // Fix it now... } }