mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-11-11 23:05:31 +00:00
3b1088a2cc
If a value is defined by a COPY, that instuction can easily and cheaply be found by getInstructionFromIndex(VNI->def). This reduces the size of VNInfo from 24 to 16 bytes, and improves llc compile time by 3%. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
271 lines
9.5 KiB
C++
271 lines
9.5 KiB
C++
//===---- LiveRangeCalc.cpp - Calculate live ranges -----------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Implementation of the LiveRangeCalc class.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "regalloc"
|
|
#include "LiveRangeCalc.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
void LiveRangeCalc::reset(const MachineFunction *MF) {
|
|
unsigned N = MF->getNumBlockIDs();
|
|
Seen.clear();
|
|
Seen.resize(N);
|
|
LiveOut.resize(N);
|
|
LiveIn.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Transfer information from the LiveIn vector to the live ranges.
|
|
void LiveRangeCalc::updateLiveIns(VNInfo *OverrideVNI, SlotIndexes *Indexes) {
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveIn.begin(),
|
|
E = LiveIn.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (!I->DomNode)
|
|
continue;
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = I->DomNode->getBlock();
|
|
|
|
VNInfo *VNI = OverrideVNI ? OverrideVNI : I->Value;
|
|
assert(VNI && "No live-in value found");
|
|
|
|
SlotIndex Start, End;
|
|
tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(MBB);
|
|
|
|
if (I->Kill.isValid())
|
|
I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
|
|
else {
|
|
I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
|
|
// The value is live-through, update LiveOut as well. Defer the Domtree
|
|
// lookup until it is needed.
|
|
assert(Seen.test(MBB->getNumber()));
|
|
LiveOut[MBB] = LiveOutPair(VNI, (MachineDomTreeNode *)0);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
LiveIn.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
void LiveRangeCalc::extend(LiveInterval *LI,
|
|
SlotIndex Kill,
|
|
SlotIndexes *Indexes,
|
|
MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
|
|
VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
|
|
assert(LI && "Missing live range");
|
|
assert(Kill.isValid() && "Invalid SlotIndex");
|
|
assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
|
|
assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
|
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *KillMBB = Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(Kill.getPrevSlot());
|
|
assert(KillMBB && "No MBB at Kill");
|
|
|
|
// Is there a def in the same MBB we can extend?
|
|
if (LI->extendInBlock(Indexes->getMBBStartIdx(KillMBB), Kill))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// Find the single reaching def, or determine if Kill is jointly dominated by
|
|
// multiple values, and we may need to create even more phi-defs to preserve
|
|
// VNInfo SSA form. Perform a search for all predecessor blocks where we
|
|
// know the dominating VNInfo.
|
|
VNInfo *VNI = findReachingDefs(LI, KillMBB, Kill, Indexes, DomTree);
|
|
|
|
// When there were multiple different values, we may need new PHIs.
|
|
if (!VNI)
|
|
updateSSA(Indexes, DomTree, Alloc);
|
|
|
|
updateLiveIns(VNI, Indexes);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This function is called by a client after using the low-level API to add
|
|
// live-out and live-in blocks. The unique value optimization is not
|
|
// available, SplitEditor::transferValues handles that case directly anyway.
|
|
void LiveRangeCalc::calculateValues(SlotIndexes *Indexes,
|
|
MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
|
|
VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
|
|
assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
|
|
assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
|
|
updateSSA(Indexes, DomTree, Alloc);
|
|
updateLiveIns(0, Indexes);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
VNInfo *LiveRangeCalc::findReachingDefs(LiveInterval *LI,
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *KillMBB,
|
|
SlotIndex Kill,
|
|
SlotIndexes *Indexes,
|
|
MachineDominatorTree *DomTree) {
|
|
// Blocks where LI should be live-in.
|
|
SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock*, 16> WorkList(1, KillMBB);
|
|
|
|
// Remember if we have seen more than one value.
|
|
bool UniqueVNI = true;
|
|
VNInfo *TheVNI = 0;
|
|
|
|
// Using Seen as a visited set, perform a BFS for all reaching defs.
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i != WorkList.size(); ++i) {
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = WorkList[i];
|
|
assert(!MBB->pred_empty() && "Value live-in to entry block?");
|
|
for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
|
|
PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
|
|
|
|
// Is this a known live-out block?
|
|
if (Seen.test(Pred->getNumber())) {
|
|
if (VNInfo *VNI = LiveOut[Pred].first) {
|
|
if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
|
|
UniqueVNI = false;
|
|
TheVNI = VNI;
|
|
}
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SlotIndex Start, End;
|
|
tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(Pred);
|
|
|
|
// First time we see Pred. Try to determine the live-out value, but set
|
|
// it as null if Pred is live-through with an unknown value.
|
|
VNInfo *VNI = LI->extendInBlock(Start, End);
|
|
setLiveOutValue(Pred, VNI);
|
|
if (VNI) {
|
|
if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
|
|
UniqueVNI = false;
|
|
TheVNI = VNI;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// No, we need a live-in value for Pred as well
|
|
if (Pred != KillMBB)
|
|
WorkList.push_back(Pred);
|
|
else
|
|
// Loopback to KillMBB, so value is really live through.
|
|
Kill = SlotIndex();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Transfer WorkList to LiveInBlocks in reverse order.
|
|
// This ordering works best with updateSSA().
|
|
LiveIn.clear();
|
|
LiveIn.reserve(WorkList.size());
|
|
while(!WorkList.empty())
|
|
addLiveInBlock(LI, DomTree->getNode(WorkList.pop_back_val()));
|
|
|
|
// The kill block may not be live-through.
|
|
assert(LiveIn.back().DomNode->getBlock() == KillMBB);
|
|
LiveIn.back().Kill = Kill;
|
|
|
|
return UniqueVNI ? TheVNI : 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This is essentially the same iterative algorithm that SSAUpdater uses,
|
|
// except we already have a dominator tree, so we don't have to recompute it.
|
|
void LiveRangeCalc::updateSSA(SlotIndexes *Indexes,
|
|
MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
|
|
VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
|
|
assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
|
|
assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
|
|
|
|
// Interate until convergence.
|
|
unsigned Changes;
|
|
do {
|
|
Changes = 0;
|
|
// Propagate live-out values down the dominator tree, inserting phi-defs
|
|
// when necessary.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveIn.begin(),
|
|
E = LiveIn.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *Node = I->DomNode;
|
|
// Skip block if the live-in value has already been determined.
|
|
if (!Node)
|
|
continue;
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = Node->getBlock();
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *IDom = Node->getIDom();
|
|
LiveOutPair IDomValue;
|
|
|
|
// We need a live-in value to a block with no immediate dominator?
|
|
// This is probably an unreachable block that has survived somehow.
|
|
bool needPHI = !IDom || !Seen.test(IDom->getBlock()->getNumber());
|
|
|
|
// IDom dominates all of our predecessors, but it may not be their
|
|
// immediate dominator. Check if any of them have live-out values that are
|
|
// properly dominated by IDom. If so, we need a phi-def here.
|
|
if (!needPHI) {
|
|
IDomValue = LiveOut[IDom->getBlock()];
|
|
|
|
// Cache the DomTree node that defined the value.
|
|
if (IDomValue.first && !IDomValue.second)
|
|
LiveOut[IDom->getBlock()].second = IDomValue.second =
|
|
DomTree->getNode(Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(IDomValue.first->def));
|
|
|
|
for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
|
|
PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
|
|
LiveOutPair &Value = LiveOut[*PI];
|
|
if (!Value.first || Value.first == IDomValue.first)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Cache the DomTree node that defined the value.
|
|
if (!Value.second)
|
|
Value.second =
|
|
DomTree->getNode(Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(Value.first->def));
|
|
|
|
// This predecessor is carrying something other than IDomValue.
|
|
// It could be because IDomValue hasn't propagated yet, or it could be
|
|
// because MBB is in the dominance frontier of that value.
|
|
if (DomTree->dominates(IDom, Value.second)) {
|
|
needPHI = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The value may be live-through even if Kill is set, as can happen when
|
|
// we are called from extendRange. In that case LiveOutSeen is true, and
|
|
// LiveOut indicates a foreign or missing value.
|
|
LiveOutPair &LOP = LiveOut[MBB];
|
|
|
|
// Create a phi-def if required.
|
|
if (needPHI) {
|
|
++Changes;
|
|
assert(Alloc && "Need VNInfo allocator to create PHI-defs");
|
|
SlotIndex Start, End;
|
|
tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(MBB);
|
|
VNInfo *VNI = I->LI->getNextValue(Start, *Alloc);
|
|
VNI->setIsPHIDef(true);
|
|
I->Value = VNI;
|
|
// This block is done, we know the final value.
|
|
I->DomNode = 0;
|
|
|
|
// Add liveness since updateLiveIns now skips this node.
|
|
if (I->Kill.isValid())
|
|
I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
|
|
else {
|
|
I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
|
|
LOP = LiveOutPair(VNI, Node);
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (IDomValue.first) {
|
|
// No phi-def here. Remember incoming value.
|
|
I->Value = IDomValue.first;
|
|
|
|
// If the IDomValue is killed in the block, don't propagate through.
|
|
if (I->Kill.isValid())
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Propagate IDomValue if it isn't killed:
|
|
// MBB is live-out and doesn't define its own value.
|
|
if (LOP.first == IDomValue.first)
|
|
continue;
|
|
++Changes;
|
|
LOP = IDomValue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} while (Changes);
|
|
}
|