llvm-6502/lib/Analysis
Chandler Carruth febf86d7e3 [LCG] Add the last (and most complex) of the edge insertion mutation
operations on the call graph. This one forms a cycle, and while not as
complex as removing an internal edge from an SCC, it involves
a reasonable amount of work to find all of the nodes newly connected in
a cycle.

Also somewhat alarming is the worst case complexity here: it might have
to walk roughly the entire SCC inverse DAG to insert a single edge. This
is carefully documented in the API (I hope).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-04 09:38:32 +00:00
..
IPA
AliasAnalysis.cpp
AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp
AliasDebugger.cpp
AliasSetTracker.cpp
Analysis.cpp
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp
BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
CaptureTracking.cpp
CFG.cpp
CFGPrinter.cpp
CGSCCPassManager.cpp
CMakeLists.txt
CodeMetrics.cpp
ConstantFolding.cpp
CostModel.cpp
Delinearization.cpp
DependenceAnalysis.cpp
DominanceFrontier.cpp
DomPrinter.cpp
InstCount.cpp
InstructionSimplify.cpp
Interval.cpp
IntervalPartition.cpp
IVUsers.cpp
LazyCallGraph.cpp [LCG] Add the last (and most complex) of the edge insertion mutation 2014-05-04 09:38:32 +00:00
LazyValueInfo.cpp
LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp
LibCallSemantics.cpp
Lint.cpp
LLVMBuild.txt
Loads.cpp
LoopInfo.cpp
LoopPass.cpp
Makefile
MemDepPrinter.cpp
MemoryBuiltins.cpp
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp
NoAliasAnalysis.cpp
PHITransAddr.cpp
PostDominators.cpp
PtrUseVisitor.cpp
README.txt
RegionInfo.cpp
RegionPass.cpp
RegionPrinter.cpp
ScalarEvolution.cpp
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp
ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp
SparsePropagation.cpp
TargetTransformInfo.cpp
Trace.cpp
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp
ValueTracking.cpp

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//