Rafael Espindola 7b677dd986 Stop inventing symbol sizes. ... MachO and COFF quite reasonably only define the size for common symbols. We used to try to figure out the "size" by computing the gap from one symbol to the next. This would not be correct in general, since a part of a section can belong to no visible symbol (padding, private globals). It was also really expensive, since we would walk every symbol to find the size of one. If a caller really wants this, it can sort all the symbols once and get all the gaps ("size") in O(n log n) instead of O(n^2). On MachO this also has the advantage of centralizing all the checks for an invalid n_sect. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2015-05-22 15:43:00 +00:00
..
AArch64	[Objdump] Pass the correct subtarget to printInst.	2015-03-28 20:44:05 +00:00
ARM
Inputs
X86	Stop inventing symbol sizes.	2015-05-22 15:43:00 +00:00
coff-file.test
coff-large-bss.test
coff-many-relocs.test
coff-non-null-terminated-file.test
coff-private-headers.test
common-symbol-elf.test
hex-relocation-addr.test
macho-bad-ordinal.test
macho-bind2.test
macho-bind.test
macho-compact-unwind-i386.test
macho-compact-unwind-x86_64.test
macho-exports-trie.test
macho-lazy-bind.test
macho-rebase.test
macho-sections.test	Add a -raw option to the -section mode of llvm-objdump.	2015-03-27 17:31:15 +00:00
macho-unwind-info-arm64.test
macho-unwind-info-no-relocs.test
macho-unwind-info-x86_64.test
macho-weak-bind.test
proc-specific-section-elf.test
win64-unwind-data.test