David Majnemer 9970214474 SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors ... The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered. This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various types: we had a size mismatch. This fixes PR21480. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00
..
address-spaces.ll
alignment.ll
basictest.ll
big-endian.ll
fca.ll
phi-and-select.ll	SROA: Don't insert instructions before a PHI	2014-09-01 21:20:14 +00:00
slice-order-independence.ll
slice-width.ll	Add a test case for SROA where the store size is bigger than slice size. The	2014-08-22 23:27:04 +00:00
vector-conversion.ll
vector-lifetime-intrinsic.ll
vector-promotion.ll	SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors	2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00
vectors-of-pointers.ll