llvm-6502/lib/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.cpp
Misha Brukman 2f2d06506c Fixed spelling and grammar.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@8478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2003-09-11 18:14:24 +00:00

336 lines
14 KiB
C++

//===- LoadValueNumbering.cpp - Load Value #'ing Implementation -*- C++ -*-===//
//
// This file implements a value numbering pass that value #'s load instructions.
// To do this, it finds lexically identical load instructions, and uses alias
// analysis to determine which loads are guaranteed to produce the same value.
//
// This pass builds off of another value numbering pass to implement value
// numbering for non-load instructions. It uses Alias Analysis so that it can
// disambiguate the load instructions. The more powerful these base analyses
// are, the more powerful the resultant analysis will be.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Type.h"
#include "llvm/iMemory.h"
#include "llvm/BasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <set>
namespace {
// FIXME: This should not be a FunctionPass.
struct LoadVN : public FunctionPass, public ValueNumbering {
/// Pass Implementation stuff. This doesn't do any analysis.
///
bool runOnFunction(Function &) { return false; }
/// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering
/// and Alias Analysis.
///
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const;
/// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
/// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal
/// values.
///
virtual void getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V1,
std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const;
private:
/// haveEqualValueNumber - Given two load instructions, determine if they
/// both produce the same value on every execution of the program, assuming
/// that their source operands always give the same value. This uses the
/// AliasAnalysis implementation to invalidate loads when stores or function
/// calls occur that could modify the value produced by the load.
///
bool haveEqualValueNumber(LoadInst *LI, LoadInst *LI2, AliasAnalysis &AA,
DominatorSet &DomSetInfo) const;
bool haveEqualValueNumber(LoadInst *LI, StoreInst *SI, AliasAnalysis &AA,
DominatorSet &DomSetInfo) const;
};
// Register this pass...
RegisterOpt<LoadVN> X("load-vn", "Load Value Numbering");
// Declare that we implement the ValueNumbering interface
RegisterAnalysisGroup<ValueNumbering, LoadVN> Y;
}
Pass *createLoadValueNumberingPass() { return new LoadVN(); }
/// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering and
/// Alias Analysis.
///
void LoadVN::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>();
AU.addRequired<ValueNumbering>();
AU.addRequired<DominatorSet>();
AU.addRequired<TargetData>();
}
// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal values.
//
void LoadVN::getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V,
std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const {
// If the alias analysis has any must alias information to share with us, we
// can definitely use it.
if (isa<PointerType>(V->getType()))
getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>().getMustAliases(V, RetVals);
if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(V)) {
// Volatile loads cannot be replaced with the value of other loads.
if (LI->isVolatile())
return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
// If we have a load instruction, find all of the load and store
// instructions that use the same source operand. We implement this
// recursively, because there could be a load of a load of a load that are
// all identical. We are guaranteed that this cannot be an infinite
// recursion because load instructions would have to pass through a PHI node
// in order for there to be a cycle. The PHI node would be handled by the
// else case here, breaking the infinite recursion.
//
std::vector<Value*> PointerSources;
getEqualNumberNodes(LI->getOperand(0), PointerSources);
PointerSources.push_back(LI->getOperand(0));
Function *F = LI->getParent()->getParent();
// Now that we know the set of equivalent source pointers for the load
// instruction, look to see if there are any load or store candidates that
// are identical.
//
std::vector<LoadInst*> CandidateLoads;
std::vector<StoreInst*> CandidateStores;
while (!PointerSources.empty()) {
Value *Source = PointerSources.back();
PointerSources.pop_back(); // Get a source pointer...
for (Value::use_iterator UI = Source->use_begin(), UE = Source->use_end();
UI != UE; ++UI)
if (LoadInst *Cand = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(*UI)) {// Is a load of source?
if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && // In the same function?
Cand != LI && !Cand->isVolatile()) // Not LI itself?
CandidateLoads.push_back(Cand); // Got one...
} else if (StoreInst *Cand = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*UI)) {
if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && !Cand->isVolatile() &&
Cand->getOperand(1) == Source) // It's a store THROUGH the ptr...
CandidateStores.push_back(Cand);
}
}
// Remove duplicates from the CandidateLoads list because alias analysis
// processing may be somewhat expensive and we don't want to do more work
// than necessary.
//
unsigned OldSize = CandidateLoads.size();
std::sort(CandidateLoads.begin(), CandidateLoads.end());
CandidateLoads.erase(std::unique(CandidateLoads.begin(),
CandidateLoads.end()),
CandidateLoads.end());
// FIXME: REMOVE THIS SORTING AND UNIQUING IF IT CAN'T HAPPEN
assert(CandidateLoads.size() == OldSize && "Shrunk the candloads list?");
// Get Alias Analysis...
AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
DominatorSet &DomSetInfo = getAnalysis<DominatorSet>();
// Loop over all of the candidate loads. If they are not invalidated by
// stores or calls between execution of them and LI, then add them to
// RetVals.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = CandidateLoads.size(); i != e; ++i)
if (haveEqualValueNumber(LI, CandidateLoads[i], AA, DomSetInfo))
RetVals.push_back(CandidateLoads[i]);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = CandidateStores.size(); i != e; ++i)
if (haveEqualValueNumber(LI, CandidateStores[i], AA, DomSetInfo))
RetVals.push_back(CandidateStores[i]->getOperand(0));
} else {
assert(&getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>() != (ValueNumbering*)this &&
"getAnalysis() returned this!");
// Not a load instruction? Just chain to the base value numbering
// implementation to satisfy the request...
return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
}
}
// CheckForInvalidatingInst - Return true if BB or any of the predecessors of BB
// (until DestBB) contain an instruction that might invalidate Ptr.
//
static bool CheckForInvalidatingInst(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *DestBB,
Value *Ptr, unsigned Size,
AliasAnalysis &AA,
std::set<BasicBlock*> &VisitedSet) {
// Found the termination point!
if (BB == DestBB || VisitedSet.count(BB)) return false;
// Avoid infinite recursion!
VisitedSet.insert(BB);
// Can this basic block modify Ptr?
if (AA.canBasicBlockModify(*BB, Ptr, Size))
return true;
// Check all of our predecessor blocks...
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), PE = pred_end(BB); PI != PE; ++PI)
if (CheckForInvalidatingInst(*PI, DestBB, Ptr, Size, AA, VisitedSet))
return true;
// None of our predecessor blocks contain an invalidating instruction, and we
// don't either!
return false;
}
/// haveEqualValueNumber - Given two load instructions, determine if they both
/// produce the same value on every execution of the program, assuming that
/// their source operands always give the same value. This uses the
/// AliasAnalysis implementation to invalidate loads when stores or function
/// calls occur that could modify the value produced by the load.
///
bool LoadVN::haveEqualValueNumber(LoadInst *L1, LoadInst *L2,
AliasAnalysis &AA,
DominatorSet &DomSetInfo) const {
// Figure out which load dominates the other one. If neither dominates the
// other we cannot eliminate them.
//
// FIXME: This could be enhanced to some cases with a shared dominator!
//
if (DomSetInfo.dominates(L2, L1))
std::swap(L1, L2); // Make L1 dominate L2
else if (!DomSetInfo.dominates(L1, L2))
return false; // Neither instruction dominates the other one...
BasicBlock *BB1 = L1->getParent(), *BB2 = L2->getParent();
Value *LoadAddress = L1->getOperand(0);
assert(L1->getType() == L2->getType() &&
"How could the same source pointer return different types?");
// Find out how many bytes of memory are loaded by the load instruction...
unsigned LoadSize = getAnalysis<TargetData>().getTypeSize(L1->getType());
// L1 now dominates L2. Check to see if the intervening instructions between
// the two loads include a store or call...
//
if (BB1 == BB2) { // In same basic block?
// In this degenerate case, no checking of global basic blocks has to occur
// just check the instructions BETWEEN L1 & L2...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(*L1, *L2, LoadAddress, LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// No instructions invalidate the loads, they produce the same value!
return true;
} else {
// Make sure that there are no store instructions between L1 and the end of
// its basic block...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(*L1, *BB1->getTerminator(), LoadAddress,
LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// Make sure that there are no store instructions between the start of BB2
// and the second load instruction...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(BB2->front(), *L2, LoadAddress, LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// Do a depth first traversal of the inverse CFG starting at L2's block,
// looking for L1's block. The inverse CFG is made up of the predecessor
// nodes of a block... so all of the edges in the graph are "backward".
//
std::set<BasicBlock*> VisitedSet;
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB2), PE = pred_end(BB2); PI != PE; ++PI)
if (CheckForInvalidatingInst(*PI, BB1, LoadAddress, LoadSize, AA,
VisitedSet))
return false;
// If we passed all of these checks then we are sure that the two loads
// produce the same value.
return true;
}
}
/// haveEqualValueNumber - Given a load instruction and a store instruction,
/// determine if the stored value reaches the loaded value unambiguously on
/// every execution of the program. This uses the AliasAnalysis implementation
/// to invalidate the stored value when stores or function calls occur that
/// could modify the value produced by the load.
///
bool LoadVN::haveEqualValueNumber(LoadInst *Load, StoreInst *Store,
AliasAnalysis &AA,
DominatorSet &DomSetInfo) const {
// If the store does not dominate the load, we cannot do anything...
if (!DomSetInfo.dominates(Store, Load))
return false;
BasicBlock *BB1 = Store->getParent(), *BB2 = Load->getParent();
Value *LoadAddress = Load->getOperand(0);
assert(LoadAddress->getType() == Store->getOperand(1)->getType() &&
"How could the same source pointer return different types?");
// Find out how many bytes of memory are loaded by the load instruction...
unsigned LoadSize = getAnalysis<TargetData>().getTypeSize(Load->getType());
// Compute a basic block iterator pointing to the instruction after the store.
BasicBlock::iterator StoreIt = Store; ++StoreIt;
// Check to see if the intervening instructions between the two store and load
// include a store or call...
//
if (BB1 == BB2) { // In same basic block?
// In this degenerate case, no checking of global basic blocks has to occur
// just check the instructions BETWEEN Store & Load...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(*StoreIt, *Load, LoadAddress, LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// No instructions invalidate the stored value, they produce the same value!
return true;
} else {
// Make sure that there are no store instructions between the Store and the
// end of its basic block...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(*StoreIt, *BB1->getTerminator(),
LoadAddress, LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// Make sure that there are no store instructions between the start of BB2
// and the second load instruction...
//
if (AA.canInstructionRangeModify(BB2->front(), *Load, LoadAddress,LoadSize))
return false; // Cannot eliminate load
// Do a depth first traversal of the inverse CFG starting at L2's block,
// looking for L1's block. The inverse CFG is made up of the predecessor
// nodes of a block... so all of the edges in the graph are "backward".
//
std::set<BasicBlock*> VisitedSet;
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB2), PE = pred_end(BB2); PI != PE; ++PI)
if (CheckForInvalidatingInst(*PI, BB1, LoadAddress, LoadSize, AA,
VisitedSet))
return false;
// If we passed all of these checks then we are sure that the two loads
// produce the same value.
return true;
}
}