llvm-6502/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
Rafael Espindola c9ae8cc24c Change the implementation of dominates(inst, inst) to one based on what the
verifier does. This correctly handles invoke.
Thanks to Duncan, Andrew and Chris for the comments.
Thanks to Joerg for the early testing.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151469 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-02-26 02:19:19 +00:00

177 lines
5.8 KiB
C++

//===- Dominators.cpp - Dominator Calculation -----------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding
// forward dominators. Postdominators are available in libanalysis, but are not
// included in libvmcore, because it's not needed. Forward dominators are
// needed to support the Verifier pass.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h"
#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include <algorithm>
using namespace llvm;
// Always verify dominfo if expensive checking is enabled.
#ifdef XDEBUG
static bool VerifyDomInfo = true;
#else
static bool VerifyDomInfo = false;
#endif
static cl::opt<bool,true>
VerifyDomInfoX("verify-dom-info", cl::location(VerifyDomInfo),
cl::desc("Verify dominator info (time consuming)"));
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// DominatorTree Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Provide public access to DominatorTree information. Implementation details
// can be found in DominatorInternals.h.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock>);
TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock>);
char DominatorTree::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS(DominatorTree, "domtree",
"Dominator Tree Construction", true, true)
bool DominatorTree::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
DT->recalculate(F);
return false;
}
void DominatorTree::verifyAnalysis() const {
if (!VerifyDomInfo) return;
Function &F = *getRoot()->getParent();
DominatorTree OtherDT;
OtherDT.getBase().recalculate(F);
if (compare(OtherDT)) {
errs() << "DominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n";
print(errs());
errs() << "\nActual:\n";
OtherDT.print(errs());
abort();
}
}
void DominatorTree::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const {
DT->print(OS);
}
// dominates - Return true if Def dominates a use in User. This performs
// the special checks necessary if Def and User are in the same basic block.
// Note that Def doesn't dominate a use in Def itself!
bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
const Instruction *User) const {
const BasicBlock *UseBB = User->getParent();
const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
"We only handle reachable blocks");
// An instruction doesn't dominate a use in itself.
if (Def == User)
return false;
// The value defined by an invoke dominates an instruction only if
// it dominates every instruction in UseBB.
// A PHI is dominated only if the instruction dominates every possible use
// in the UseBB.
if (isa<InvokeInst>(Def) || isa<PHINode>(User))
return dominates(Def, UseBB);
if (DefBB != UseBB)
return dominates(DefBB, UseBB);
// Loop through the basic block until we find Def or User.
BasicBlock::const_iterator I = DefBB->begin();
for (; &*I != Def && &*I != User; ++I)
/*empty*/;
return &*I == Def;
}
// true if Def would dominate a use in any instruction in UseBB.
// note that dominates(Def, Def->getParent()) is false.
bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
const BasicBlock *UseBB) const {
const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
"We only handle reachable blocks");
if (DefBB == UseBB)
return false;
const InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Def);
if (!II)
return dominates(DefBB, UseBB);
// Invoke results are only usable in the normal destination, not in the
// exceptional destination.
BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest();
if (!dominates(NormalDest, UseBB))
return false;
// Simple case: if the normal destination has a single predecessor, the
// fact that it dominates the use block implies that we also do.
if (NormalDest->getSinglePredecessor())
return true;
// The normal edge from the invoke is critical. Conceptually, what we would
// like to do is split it and check if the new block dominates the use.
// With X being the new block, the graph would look like:
//
// DefBB
// /\ . .
// / \ . .
// / \ . .
// / \ | |
// A X B C
// | \ | /
// . \|/
// . NormalDest
// .
//
// Given the definition of dominance, NormalDest is dominated by X iff X
// dominates all of NormalDest's predecessors (X, B, C in the example). X
// trivially dominates itself, so we only have to find if it dominates the
// other predecessors. Since the only way out of X is via NormalDest, X can
// only properly dominate a node if NormalDest dominates that node too.
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(NormalDest),
E = pred_end(NormalDest); PI != E; ++PI) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *PI;
if (BB == DefBB)
continue;
if (!DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB))
continue;
if (!dominates(NormalDest, BB))
return false;
}
return true;
}