llvm-6502/test/CodeGen/Generic/MachineBranchProb.ll
Hans Wennborg 395f4f4b2a Switch lowering: extract jump tables and bit tests before building binary tree (PR22262)
This is a re-commit of r235101, which also fixes the problems with the previous patch:

- Switches with only a default case and non-fallthrough were handled incorrectly

- The previous patch tickled a bug in PowerPC Early-Return Creation which is fixed here.

> This is a major rewrite of the SelectionDAG switch lowering. The previous code
> would lower switches as a binary tre, discovering clusters of cases
> suitable for lowering by jump tables or bit tests as it went along. To increase
> the likelihood of finding jump tables, the binary tree pivot was selected to
> maximize case density on both sides of the pivot.
>
> By not selecting the pivot in the middle, the binary trees would not always
> be balanced, leading to performance problems in the generated code.
>
> This patch rewrites the lowering to search for clusters of cases
> suitable for jump tables or bit tests first, and then builds the binary
> tree around those clusters. This way, the binary tree will always be balanced.
>
> This has the added benefit of decoupling the different aspects of the lowering:
> tree building and jump table or bit tests finding are now easier to tweak
> separately.
>
> For example, this will enable us to balance the tree based on profile info
> in the future.
>
> The algorithm for finding jump tables is quadratic, whereas the previous algorithm
> was O(n log n) for common cases, and quadratic only in the worst-case. This
> doesn't seem to be major problem in practice, e.g. compiling a file consisting
> of a 10k-case switch was only 30% slower, and such large switches should be rare
> in practice. Compiling e.g. gcc.c showed no compile-time difference.  If this
> does turn out to be a problem, we could limit the search space of the algorithm.
>
> This commit also disables all optimizations during switch lowering in -O0.
>
> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8649

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-04-22 23:14:56 +00:00

36 lines
1.0 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: llc < %s -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; ARM & AArch64 run an extra SimplifyCFG which disrupts this test.
; XFAIL: arm,aarch64
; Make sure we have the correct weight attached to each successor.
define i32 @test2(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable readnone ssp {
; CHECK: Machine code for function test2:
entry:
%conv = sext i32 %x to i64
switch i64 %conv, label %return [
i64 0, label %sw.bb
i64 1, label %sw.bb
i64 4, label %sw.bb
i64 5, label %sw.bb1
], !prof !0
; CHECK: BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
; CHECK: Successors according to CFG: BB#2(64) BB#4(14)
; CHECK: BB#4: derived from LLVM BB %entry
; CHECK: Successors according to CFG: BB#1(4) BB#5(10)
; CHECK: BB#5: derived from LLVM BB %entry
; CHECK: Successors according to CFG: BB#1(10) BB#3(7)
sw.bb:
br label %return
sw.bb1:
br label %return
return:
%retval.0 = phi i32 [ 5, %sw.bb1 ], [ 1, %sw.bb ], [ 0, %entry ]
ret i32 %retval.0
}
!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 7, i32 6, i32 4, i32 4, i32 64}