Kostya Serebryany 42a9da35b8 Don't speculate loads under ThreadSanitizer
Summary:
Don't speculate loads under ThreadSanitizer.
This fixes https://code.google.com/p/thread-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=40
Also discussed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-November/067929.html

Reviewers: chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

CC: llvm-commits, dvyukov

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2227

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-11-21 07:29:28 +00:00
..
2013-11-12 22:47:20 +00:00
2013-11-12 22:47:20 +00:00
2013-10-22 01:40:25 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//