mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-11-07 12:07:17 +00:00
2f46bb8178
my earlier patch to this file. The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad because register pressure later forced both base and IV into memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general; the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However, there were side effects.... It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is). I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite. It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers). In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither of which was handled before. And when inserting new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such code at the original location rather than in the PHI's immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside the loop (a case that couldn't happen before) (RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making multiple copies of it in this case. Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop. This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing into GEP's outside the loop. Also, when we build an expression that involves a (possibly non-affine) IV from a different loop as well as an IV from the one we're interested in (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop), don't recurse into that. We can't do much with it and will get in trouble if we try to create new non-affine IVs or something. More testcases are coming. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@62212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 2005-08-15-AddRecIV.ll | ||
| 2005-08-17-OutOfLoopVariant.ll | ||
| 2005-09-12-UsesOutOutsideOfLoop.ll | ||
| 2007-04-23-UseIterator.ll | ||
| 2008-08-06-CmpStride.ll | ||
| 2008-08-13-CmpStride.ll | ||
| 2008-08-14-ShadowIV.ll | ||
| 2008-09-09-Overflow.ll | ||
| 2009-01-13-nonconstant-stride-outside-loop.ll | ||
| change-compare-stride-trickiness-0.ll | ||
| change-compare-stride-trickiness-1.ll | ||
| dead-phi.ll | ||
| dg.exp | ||
| different-type-ivs.ll | ||
| dont_insert_redundant_ops.ll | ||
| dont_reduce_bytes.ll | ||
| dont-hoist-simple-loop-constants.ll | ||
| exit_compare_live_range.ll | ||
| invariant_value_first_arg.ll | ||
| invariant_value_first.ll | ||
| nested-reduce.ll | ||
| ops_after_indvar.ll | ||
| phi_node_update_multiple_preds.ll | ||
| pr2570.ll | ||
| related_indvars.ll | ||
| remove_indvar.ll | ||
| share_code_in_preheader.ll | ||
| share_ivs.ll | ||
| use_postinc_value_outside_loop.ll | ||
| var_stride_used_by_compare.ll | ||
| variable_stride.ll | ||