Chris Lattner 4d3a16f81b Add a minor optimization: if we haven't changed the operands of an
add, there is no need to scan the world to find the same add again.
This invalidates the previous testcase, which wasn't wonderful anyway,
because it needed a run of instcombine to permute the use-lists in 
just the right way to before GVN was run (so it was really fragile).
Not a big loss.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@90973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-12-09 17:27:45 +00:00
..
2009-12-04 04:15:36 +00:00
2009-11-16 03:51:42 +00:00
2009-12-03 13:23:03 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//