llvm-6502/test/CodeGen/X86/switch-bt.ll
Daniel Jasper 529ff2f257 Prevent binary-tree deterioration in sparse switch statements.
This addresses part of llvm.org/PR22262. Specifically, it prevents
considering the densities of sub-ranges that have fewer than
TLI.getMinimumJumpTableEntries() elements. Those densities won't help
jump tables.

This is not a complete solution but works around the most pressing
issue.

Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7070

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226600 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-20 19:43:33 +00:00

160 lines
3.7 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -asm-verbose=false < %s | FileCheck %s
; This switch should use bit tests, and the third bit test case is just
; testing for one possible value, so it doesn't need a bt.
; CHECK: movabsq $2305843009482129440, %r
; CHECK-NEXT: btq %rax, %r
; CHECK-NEXT: jae
; CHECK: movl $671088640, %e
; CHECK-NEXT: btq %rax, %r
; CHECK-NEXT: jae
; CHECK: testq %rax, %r
; CHECK-NEXT: j
define void @test(i8* %l) nounwind {
entry:
%l.addr = alloca i8*, align 8 ; <i8**> [#uses=2]
store i8* %l, i8** %l.addr
%tmp = load i8** %l.addr ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%tmp1 = load i8* %tmp ; <i8> [#uses=1]
%conv = sext i8 %tmp1 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
switch i32 %conv, label %sw.default [
i32 62, label %sw.bb
i32 60, label %sw.bb
i32 38, label %sw.bb2
i32 94, label %sw.bb2
i32 61, label %sw.bb2
i32 33, label %sw.bb4
]
sw.bb: ; preds = %entry, %entry
call void @foo(i32 0)
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb2: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry
call void @foo(i32 1)
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb4: ; preds = %entry
call void @foo(i32 3)
br label %sw.epilog
sw.default: ; preds = %entry
call void @foo(i32 97)
br label %sw.epilog
sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb4, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb
ret void
}
declare void @foo(i32)
; Don't zero extend the test operands to pointer type if it can be avoided.
; rdar://8781238
define void @test2(i32 %x) nounwind ssp {
; CHECK-LABEL: test2:
; CHECK: cmpl $6
; CHECK: ja
; CHECK-NEXT: movl $91
; CHECK-NOT: movl
; CHECK-NEXT: btl
; CHECK-NEXT: jae
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
i32 6, label %if.then
i32 4, label %if.then
i32 3, label %if.then
i32 1, label %if.then
i32 0, label %if.then
]
if.then: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %entry, %entry
tail call void @bar() nounwind
ret void
if.end: ; preds = %entry
ret void
}
declare void @bar()
define void @test3(i32 %x) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: test3:
; CHECK: cmpl $5
; CHECK: ja
; CHECK: cmpl $4
; CHECK: je
switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
i32 0, label %if.then
i32 1, label %if.then
i32 2, label %if.then
i32 3, label %if.then
i32 5, label %if.then
]
if.then:
tail call void @bar() nounwind
ret void
if.end:
ret void
}
; Ensure that optimizing for jump tables doesn't needlessly deteriorate the
; created binary tree search. See PR22262.
define void @test4(i32 %x, i32* %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test4:
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %sw.default [
i32 10, label %sw.bb
i32 20, label %sw.bb1
i32 30, label %sw.bb2
i32 40, label %sw.bb3
i32 50, label %sw.bb4
i32 60, label %sw.bb5
]
sw.bb:
store i32 1, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb1:
store i32 2, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb2:
store i32 3, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb3:
store i32 4, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb4:
store i32 5, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.bb5:
store i32 6, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.default:
store i32 7, i32* %y
br label %sw.epilog
sw.epilog:
ret void
; The balanced binary switch here would start with a comparison against 39, but
; it is currently starting with 29 because of the density-sum heuristic.
; CHECK: cmpl $29
; CHECK: jg
; CHECK: cmpl $10
; CHECK: jne
; CHECK: cmpl $49
; CHECK: jg
; CHECK: cmpl $30
; CHECK: jne
; CHECK: cmpl $20
; CHECK: jne
; CHECK: cmpl $50
; CHECK: jne
; CHECK: cmpl $40
; CHECK: jne
; CHECK: cmpl $60
; CHECK: jne
}