Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 04d2186546 LTO: Ignore disabled diagnostic remarks ... r206400 and r209442 added remarks that are disabled by default. However, if a diagnostic handler is registered, the remarks are sent unfiltered to the handler. This is the right behaviour for clang, since it has its own filters. However, the diagnostic handler exposed in the LTO API receives only the severity and message. It doesn't have the information to filter by pass name. For LTO, disabled remarks should be filtered by the producer. I've changed `LLVMContext::setDiagnosticHandler()` to take a `bool` argument indicating whether to respect the built-in filters. This defaults to `false`, so other consumers don't have a behaviour change, but `LTOCodeGenerator::setDiagnosticHandler()` sets it to `true`. To make this behaviour testable, I added a `-use-diagnostic-handler` command-line option to `llvm-lto`. This fixes PR21108. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2014-10-01 18:36:03 +00:00
..
CMakeLists.txt
LLVMBuild.txt	Attempt at fixing the windows dll build.	2014-07-30 23:39:30 +00:00
LTOCodeGenerator.cpp	LTO: Ignore disabled diagnostic remarks	2014-10-01 18:36:03 +00:00
LTOModule.cpp	LTO: introduce object file-based on-disk module format.	2014-09-18 21:28:49 +00:00
Makefile