llvm-6502/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp
Robin Morisset 1ad925ccf8 Refactor AtomicExpandPass and add a generic isAtomic() method to Instruction
Summary:
Split shouldExpandAtomicInIR() into different versions for Stores/Loads/RMWs/CmpXchgs.
Makes runOnFunction cleaner (no more redundant checking/casting), and will help moving
the X86 backend to this pass.

This requires a way of easily detecting which instructions are atomic.
I followed the pattern of mayReadFromMemory, mayWriteOrReadMemory, etc.. in making
isAtomic() a method of Instruction implemented by a switch on the opcodes.

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: jfb

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5035

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217080 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-09-03 21:29:59 +00:00

381 lines
14 KiB
C++

//===-- AtomicExpandPass.cpp - Expand atomic instructions -------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file contains a pass (at IR level) to replace atomic instructions with
// appropriate (intrinsic-based) ldrex/strex loops.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "atomic-expand"
namespace {
class AtomicExpand: public FunctionPass {
const TargetMachine *TM;
public:
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
explicit AtomicExpand(const TargetMachine *TM = nullptr)
: FunctionPass(ID), TM(TM) {
initializeAtomicExpandPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
private:
bool expandAtomicLoad(LoadInst *LI);
bool expandAtomicStore(StoreInst *SI);
bool expandAtomicRMW(AtomicRMWInst *AI);
bool expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI);
};
}
char AtomicExpand::ID = 0;
char &llvm::AtomicExpandID = AtomicExpand::ID;
INITIALIZE_TM_PASS(AtomicExpand, "atomic-expand",
"Expand Atomic calls in terms of either load-linked & store-conditional or cmpxchg",
false, false)
FunctionPass *llvm::createAtomicExpandPass(const TargetMachine *TM) {
return new AtomicExpand(TM);
}
bool AtomicExpand::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
if (!TM || !TM->getSubtargetImpl()->enableAtomicExpand())
return false;
auto TargetLowering = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering();
SmallVector<Instruction *, 1> AtomicInsts;
// Changing control-flow while iterating through it is a bad idea, so gather a
// list of all atomic instructions before we start.
for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I) {
if (I->isAtomic())
AtomicInsts.push_back(&*I);
}
bool MadeChange = false;
for (auto I : AtomicInsts) {
auto LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I);
auto SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I);
auto RMWI = dyn_cast<AtomicRMWInst>(I);
auto CASI = dyn_cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(I);
assert((LI || SI || RMWI || CASI || isa<FenceInst>(I)) &&
"Unknown atomic instruction");
if (LI && TargetLowering->shouldExpandAtomicLoadInIR(LI)) {
MadeChange |= expandAtomicLoad(LI);
} else if (SI && TargetLowering->shouldExpandAtomicStoreInIR(SI)) {
MadeChange |= expandAtomicStore(SI);
} else if (RMWI && TargetLowering->shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR(RMWI)) {
MadeChange |= expandAtomicRMW(RMWI);
} else if (CASI) {
MadeChange |= expandAtomicCmpXchg(CASI);
}
}
return MadeChange;
}
bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicLoad(LoadInst *LI) {
auto TLI = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering();
// If getInsertFencesForAtomic() returns true, then the target does not want
// to deal with memory orders, and emitLeading/TrailingFence should take care
// of everything. Otherwise, emitLeading/TrailingFence are no-op and we
// should preserve the ordering.
AtomicOrdering MemOpOrder =
TLI->getInsertFencesForAtomic() ? Monotonic : LI->getOrdering();
IRBuilder<> Builder(LI);
// Note that although no fence is required before atomic load on ARM, it is
// required before SequentiallyConsistent loads for the recommended Power
// mapping (see http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp/cpp0xmappings.html).
// So we let the target choose what to emit.
TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, LI->getOrdering(),
/*IsStore=*/false, /*IsLoad=*/true);
// The only 64-bit load guaranteed to be single-copy atomic by ARM is
// an ldrexd (A3.5.3).
Value *Val =
TLI->emitLoadLinked(Builder, LI->getPointerOperand(), MemOpOrder);
TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, LI->getOrdering(),
/*IsStore=*/false, /*IsLoad=*/true);
LI->replaceAllUsesWith(Val);
LI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicStore(StoreInst *SI) {
// The only atomic 64-bit store on ARM is an strexd that succeeds, which means
// we need a loop and the entire instruction is essentially an "atomicrmw
// xchg" that ignores the value loaded.
IRBuilder<> Builder(SI);
AtomicRMWInst *AI =
Builder.CreateAtomicRMW(AtomicRMWInst::Xchg, SI->getPointerOperand(),
SI->getValueOperand(), SI->getOrdering());
SI->eraseFromParent();
// Now we have an appropriate swap instruction, lower it as usual.
return expandAtomicRMW(AI);
}
bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicRMW(AtomicRMWInst *AI) {
auto TLI = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering();
AtomicOrdering Order = AI->getOrdering();
Value *Addr = AI->getPointerOperand();
BasicBlock *BB = AI->getParent();
Function *F = BB->getParent();
LLVMContext &Ctx = F->getContext();
// If getInsertFencesForAtomic() returns true, then the target does not want
// to deal with memory orders, and emitLeading/TrailingFence should take care
// of everything. Otherwise, emitLeading/TrailingFence are no-op and we
// should preserve the ordering.
AtomicOrdering MemOpOrder =
TLI->getInsertFencesForAtomic() ? Monotonic : Order;
// Given: atomicrmw some_op iN* %addr, iN %incr ordering
//
// The standard expansion we produce is:
// [...]
// fence?
// atomicrmw.start:
// %loaded = @load.linked(%addr)
// %new = some_op iN %loaded, %incr
// %stored = @store_conditional(%new, %addr)
// %try_again = icmp i32 ne %stored, 0
// br i1 %try_again, label %loop, label %atomicrmw.end
// atomicrmw.end:
// fence?
// [...]
BasicBlock *ExitBB = BB->splitBasicBlock(AI, "atomicrmw.end");
BasicBlock *LoopBB = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "atomicrmw.start", F, ExitBB);
// This grabs the DebugLoc from AI.
IRBuilder<> Builder(AI);
// The split call above "helpfully" added a branch at the end of BB (to the
// wrong place), but we might want a fence too. It's easiest to just remove
// the branch entirely.
std::prev(BB->end())->eraseFromParent();
Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB);
TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, Order, /*IsStore=*/true, /*IsLoad=*/true);
Builder.CreateBr(LoopBB);
// Start the main loop block now that we've taken care of the preliminaries.
Builder.SetInsertPoint(LoopBB);
Value *Loaded = TLI->emitLoadLinked(Builder, Addr, MemOpOrder);
Value *NewVal;
switch (AI->getOperation()) {
case AtomicRMWInst::Xchg:
NewVal = AI->getValOperand();
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Add:
NewVal = Builder.CreateAdd(Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Sub:
NewVal = Builder.CreateSub(Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::And:
NewVal = Builder.CreateAnd(Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Nand:
NewVal = Builder.CreateNot(Builder.CreateAnd(Loaded, AI->getValOperand()),
"new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Or:
NewVal = Builder.CreateOr(Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Xor:
NewVal = Builder.CreateXor(Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Max:
NewVal = Builder.CreateICmpSGT(Loaded, AI->getValOperand());
NewVal = Builder.CreateSelect(NewVal, Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::Min:
NewVal = Builder.CreateICmpSLE(Loaded, AI->getValOperand());
NewVal = Builder.CreateSelect(NewVal, Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::UMax:
NewVal = Builder.CreateICmpUGT(Loaded, AI->getValOperand());
NewVal = Builder.CreateSelect(NewVal, Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
case AtomicRMWInst::UMin:
NewVal = Builder.CreateICmpULE(Loaded, AI->getValOperand());
NewVal = Builder.CreateSelect(NewVal, Loaded, AI->getValOperand(), "new");
break;
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unknown atomic op");
}
Value *StoreSuccess =
TLI->emitStoreConditional(Builder, NewVal, Addr, MemOpOrder);
Value *TryAgain = Builder.CreateICmpNE(
StoreSuccess, ConstantInt::get(IntegerType::get(Ctx, 32), 0), "tryagain");
Builder.CreateCondBr(TryAgain, LoopBB, ExitBB);
Builder.SetInsertPoint(ExitBB, ExitBB->begin());
TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, Order, /*IsStore=*/true, /*IsLoad=*/true);
AI->replaceAllUsesWith(Loaded);
AI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
bool AtomicExpand::expandAtomicCmpXchg(AtomicCmpXchgInst *CI) {
auto TLI = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering();
AtomicOrdering SuccessOrder = CI->getSuccessOrdering();
AtomicOrdering FailureOrder = CI->getFailureOrdering();
Value *Addr = CI->getPointerOperand();
BasicBlock *BB = CI->getParent();
Function *F = BB->getParent();
LLVMContext &Ctx = F->getContext();
// If getInsertFencesForAtomic() returns true, then the target does not want
// to deal with memory orders, and emitLeading/TrailingFence should take care
// of everything. Otherwise, emitLeading/TrailingFence are no-op and we
// should preserve the ordering.
AtomicOrdering MemOpOrder =
TLI->getInsertFencesForAtomic() ? Monotonic : SuccessOrder;
// Given: cmpxchg some_op iN* %addr, iN %desired, iN %new success_ord fail_ord
//
// The full expansion we produce is:
// [...]
// fence?
// cmpxchg.start:
// %loaded = @load.linked(%addr)
// %should_store = icmp eq %loaded, %desired
// br i1 %should_store, label %cmpxchg.trystore,
// label %cmpxchg.failure
// cmpxchg.trystore:
// %stored = @store_conditional(%new, %addr)
// %success = icmp eq i32 %stored, 0
// br i1 %success, label %cmpxchg.success, label %loop/%cmpxchg.failure
// cmpxchg.success:
// fence?
// br label %cmpxchg.end
// cmpxchg.failure:
// fence?
// br label %cmpxchg.end
// cmpxchg.end:
// %success = phi i1 [true, %cmpxchg.success], [false, %cmpxchg.failure]
// %restmp = insertvalue { iN, i1 } undef, iN %loaded, 0
// %res = insertvalue { iN, i1 } %restmp, i1 %success, 1
// [...]
BasicBlock *ExitBB = BB->splitBasicBlock(CI, "cmpxchg.end");
auto FailureBB = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "cmpxchg.failure", F, ExitBB);
auto SuccessBB = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "cmpxchg.success", F, FailureBB);
auto TryStoreBB = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "cmpxchg.trystore", F, SuccessBB);
auto LoopBB = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "cmpxchg.start", F, TryStoreBB);
// This grabs the DebugLoc from CI
IRBuilder<> Builder(CI);
// The split call above "helpfully" added a branch at the end of BB (to the
// wrong place), but we might want a fence too. It's easiest to just remove
// the branch entirely.
std::prev(BB->end())->eraseFromParent();
Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB);
TLI->emitLeadingFence(Builder, SuccessOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
/*IsLoad=*/true);
Builder.CreateBr(LoopBB);
// Start the main loop block now that we've taken care of the preliminaries.
Builder.SetInsertPoint(LoopBB);
Value *Loaded = TLI->emitLoadLinked(Builder, Addr, MemOpOrder);
Value *ShouldStore =
Builder.CreateICmpEQ(Loaded, CI->getCompareOperand(), "should_store");
// If the the cmpxchg doesn't actually need any ordering when it fails, we can
// jump straight past that fence instruction (if it exists).
Builder.CreateCondBr(ShouldStore, TryStoreBB, FailureBB);
Builder.SetInsertPoint(TryStoreBB);
Value *StoreSuccess = TLI->emitStoreConditional(
Builder, CI->getNewValOperand(), Addr, MemOpOrder);
StoreSuccess = Builder.CreateICmpEQ(
StoreSuccess, ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Ctx), 0), "success");
Builder.CreateCondBr(StoreSuccess, SuccessBB,
CI->isWeak() ? FailureBB : LoopBB);
// Make sure later instructions don't get reordered with a fence if necessary.
Builder.SetInsertPoint(SuccessBB);
TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, SuccessOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
/*IsLoad=*/true);
Builder.CreateBr(ExitBB);
Builder.SetInsertPoint(FailureBB);
TLI->emitTrailingFence(Builder, FailureOrder, /*IsStore=*/true,
/*IsLoad=*/true);
Builder.CreateBr(ExitBB);
// Finally, we have control-flow based knowledge of whether the cmpxchg
// succeeded or not. We expose this to later passes by converting any
// subsequent "icmp eq/ne %loaded, %oldval" into a use of an appropriate PHI.
// Setup the builder so we can create any PHIs we need.
Builder.SetInsertPoint(ExitBB, ExitBB->begin());
PHINode *Success = Builder.CreatePHI(Type::getInt1Ty(Ctx), 2);
Success->addIncoming(ConstantInt::getTrue(Ctx), SuccessBB);
Success->addIncoming(ConstantInt::getFalse(Ctx), FailureBB);
// Look for any users of the cmpxchg that are just comparing the loaded value
// against the desired one, and replace them with the CFG-derived version.
SmallVector<ExtractValueInst *, 2> PrunedInsts;
for (auto User : CI->users()) {
ExtractValueInst *EV = dyn_cast<ExtractValueInst>(User);
if (!EV)
continue;
assert(EV->getNumIndices() == 1 && EV->getIndices()[0] <= 1 &&
"weird extraction from { iN, i1 }");
if (EV->getIndices()[0] == 0)
EV->replaceAllUsesWith(Loaded);
else
EV->replaceAllUsesWith(Success);
PrunedInsts.push_back(EV);
}
// We can remove the instructions now we're no longer iterating through them.
for (auto EV : PrunedInsts)
EV->eraseFromParent();
if (!CI->use_empty()) {
// Some use of the full struct return that we don't understand has happened,
// so we've got to reconstruct it properly.
Value *Res;
Res = Builder.CreateInsertValue(UndefValue::get(CI->getType()), Loaded, 0);
Res = Builder.CreateInsertValue(Res, Success, 1);
CI->replaceAllUsesWith(Res);
}
CI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}