mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-01-15 07:34:33 +00:00
8b8fa7b2f4
Additionally, all such cases are handled with no dynamic check. All `classof()` of the form class Foo { [...] static bool classof(const Bar *) { return true; } [...] } where Foo is an ancestor of Bar are no longer necessary. Don't write them! Note: The exact test is `is_base_of<Foo, Bar>`, which is non-strict, so that Foo is considered an ancestor of itself. This leads to the following rule of thumb for LLVM-style RTTI: The argument type of `classof()` should be a strict ancestor. For more information about implementing LLVM-style RTTI, see docs/HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI.rst git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8