llvm-6502/test/Transforms/InstSimplify
Duncan Sands 7cf85e74e3 Fix a README item by having InstructionSimplify do a mild form of value
numbering, in which it considers (for example) "%a = add i32 %x, %y" and
"%b = add i32 %x, %y" to be equal because the operands are equal and the
result of the instructions only depends on the values of the operands.
This has almost no effect (it removes 4 instructions from gcc-as-one-file),
and perhaps slows down compilation: I measured a 0.4% slowdown on the large
gcc-as-one-file testcase, but it wasn't statistically significant.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-01-01 16:12:09 +00:00
..
2010-12-20-Distribute.ll When determining whether the new instruction was already present in 2010-12-22 17:15:25 +00:00
2010-12-20-I1Arithmetic.ll While I don't think any later transforms can fire, it seems cleaner to 2010-12-21 15:03:43 +00:00
2010-12-20-Reassociate.ll
2010-12-31-ValueNumber.ll Fix a README item by having InstructionSimplify do a mild form of value 2011-01-01 16:12:09 +00:00
dg.exp