llvm-6502/test/CodeGen/X86/peep-test-2.ll
Dan Gohman 3112581441 Arithmetic instructions don't set EFLAGS bits OF and CF bits
the same say the "test" instruction does in overflow cases,
so eliminating the test is only safe when those bits aren't
needed, as is the case for COND_E and COND_NE, or if it
can be proven that no overflow will occur. For now, just
restrict the optimization to COND_E and COND_NE and don't
do any overflow analysis.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@66318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-03-07 01:58:32 +00:00

18 lines
667 B
LLVM

; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86 | grep testl
; It's tempting to eliminate the testl instruction here and just use the
; EFLAGS value from the incl, however it can't be known whether the add
; will overflow, and if it does the incl would set OF, and the
; subsequent setg would return true.
target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:128:128"
target triple = "i386-apple-darwin9.6"
define i32 @f(i32 %j) nounwind readnone {
entry:
%0 = add i32 %j, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%2 = zext i1 %1 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %2
}