mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-12-24 06:30:19 +00:00
ae707bd559
Fixes clang selfhost. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139120 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2576 lines
98 KiB
C++
2576 lines
98 KiB
C++
//===- InstructionSimplify.cpp - Fold instruction operands ----------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements routines for folding instructions into simpler forms
|
|
// that do not require creating new instructions. This does constant folding
|
|
// ("add i32 1, 1" -> "2") but can also handle non-constant operands, either
|
|
// returning a constant ("and i32 %x, 0" -> "0") or an already existing value
|
|
// ("and i32 %x, %x" -> "%x"). All operands are assumed to have already been
|
|
// simplified: This is usually true and assuming it simplifies the logic (if
|
|
// they have not been simplified then results are correct but maybe suboptimal).
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "instsimplify"
|
|
#include "llvm/Operator.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ConstantRange.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/PatternMatch.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
|
|
|
|
enum { RecursionLimit = 3 };
|
|
|
|
STATISTIC(NumExpand, "Number of expansions");
|
|
STATISTIC(NumFactor , "Number of factorizations");
|
|
STATISTIC(NumReassoc, "Number of reassociations");
|
|
|
|
static Value *SimplifyAndInst(Value *, Value *, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned);
|
|
static Value *SimplifyBinOp(unsigned, Value *, Value *, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned);
|
|
static Value *SimplifyCmpInst(unsigned, Value *, Value *, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned);
|
|
static Value *SimplifyOrInst(Value *, Value *, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned);
|
|
static Value *SimplifyXorInst(Value *, Value *, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned);
|
|
|
|
/// getFalse - For a boolean type, or a vector of boolean type, return false, or
|
|
/// a vector with every element false, as appropriate for the type.
|
|
static Constant *getFalse(Type *Ty) {
|
|
assert((Ty->isIntegerTy(1) ||
|
|
(Ty->isVectorTy() &&
|
|
cast<VectorType>(Ty)->getElementType()->isIntegerTy(1))) &&
|
|
"Expected i1 type or a vector of i1!");
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Ty);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getTrue - For a boolean type, or a vector of boolean type, return true, or
|
|
/// a vector with every element true, as appropriate for the type.
|
|
static Constant *getTrue(Type *Ty) {
|
|
assert((Ty->isIntegerTy(1) ||
|
|
(Ty->isVectorTy() &&
|
|
cast<VectorType>(Ty)->getElementType()->isIntegerTy(1))) &&
|
|
"Expected i1 type or a vector of i1!");
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Ty);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ValueDominatesPHI - Does the given value dominate the specified phi node?
|
|
static bool ValueDominatesPHI(Value *V, PHINode *P, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V);
|
|
if (!I)
|
|
// Arguments and constants dominate all instructions.
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
// If we have a DominatorTree then do a precise test.
|
|
if (DT)
|
|
return DT->dominates(I, P);
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, if the instruction is in the entry block, and is not an invoke,
|
|
// then it obviously dominates all phi nodes.
|
|
if (I->getParent() == &I->getParent()->getParent()->getEntryBlock() &&
|
|
!isa<InvokeInst>(I))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ExpandBinOp - Simplify "A op (B op' C)" by distributing op over op', turning
|
|
/// it into "(A op B) op' (A op C)". Here "op" is given by Opcode and "op'" is
|
|
/// given by OpcodeToExpand, while "A" corresponds to LHS and "B op' C" to RHS.
|
|
/// Also performs the transform "(A op' B) op C" -> "(A op C) op' (B op C)".
|
|
/// Returns the simplified value, or null if no simplification was performed.
|
|
static Value *ExpandBinOp(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
unsigned OpcToExpand, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
Instruction::BinaryOps OpcodeToExpand = (Instruction::BinaryOps)OpcToExpand;
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// Check whether the expression has the form "(A op' B) op C".
|
|
if (BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS))
|
|
if (Op0->getOpcode() == OpcodeToExpand) {
|
|
// It does! Try turning it into "(A op C) op' (B op C)".
|
|
Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0), *B = Op0->getOperand(1), *C = RHS;
|
|
// Do "A op C" and "B op C" both simplify?
|
|
if (Value *L = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
if (Value *R = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, B, C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// They do! Return "L op' R" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If "L op' R" equals "A op' B" then "L op' R" is just the LHS.
|
|
if ((L == A && R == B) || (Instruction::isCommutative(OpcodeToExpand)
|
|
&& L == B && R == A)) {
|
|
++NumExpand;
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
}
|
|
// Otherwise return "L op' R" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(OpcodeToExpand, L, R, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumExpand;
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check whether the expression has the form "A op (B op' C)".
|
|
if (BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(RHS))
|
|
if (Op1->getOpcode() == OpcodeToExpand) {
|
|
// It does! Try turning it into "(A op B) op' (A op C)".
|
|
Value *A = LHS, *B = Op1->getOperand(0), *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
|
|
// Do "A op B" and "A op C" both simplify?
|
|
if (Value *L = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
if (Value *R = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// They do! Return "L op' R" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If "L op' R" equals "B op' C" then "L op' R" is just the RHS.
|
|
if ((L == B && R == C) || (Instruction::isCommutative(OpcodeToExpand)
|
|
&& L == C && R == B)) {
|
|
++NumExpand;
|
|
return RHS;
|
|
}
|
|
// Otherwise return "L op' R" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(OpcodeToExpand, L, R, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumExpand;
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// FactorizeBinOp - Simplify "LHS Opcode RHS" by factorizing out a common term
|
|
/// using the operation OpCodeToExtract. For example, when Opcode is Add and
|
|
/// OpCodeToExtract is Mul then this tries to turn "(A*B)+(A*C)" into "A*(B+C)".
|
|
/// Returns the simplified value, or null if no simplification was performed.
|
|
static Value *FactorizeBinOp(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
unsigned OpcToExtract, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
Instruction::BinaryOps OpcodeToExtract = (Instruction::BinaryOps)OpcToExtract;
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS);
|
|
BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(RHS);
|
|
|
|
if (!Op0 || Op0->getOpcode() != OpcodeToExtract ||
|
|
!Op1 || Op1->getOpcode() != OpcodeToExtract)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// The expression has the form "(A op' B) op (C op' D)".
|
|
Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0), *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
|
|
Value *C = Op1->getOperand(0), *D = Op1->getOperand(1);
|
|
|
|
// Use left distributivity, i.e. "X op' (Y op Z) = (X op' Y) op (X op' Z)".
|
|
// Does the instruction have the form "(A op' B) op (A op' D)" or, in the
|
|
// commutative case, "(A op' B) op (C op' A)"?
|
|
if (A == C || (Instruction::isCommutative(OpcodeToExtract) && A == D)) {
|
|
Value *DD = A == C ? D : C;
|
|
// Form "A op' (B op DD)" if it simplifies completely.
|
|
// Does "B op DD" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, B, DD, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "A op' V" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals B then "A op' V" is just the LHS. If V equals DD then
|
|
// "A op' V" is just the RHS.
|
|
if (V == B || V == DD) {
|
|
++NumFactor;
|
|
return V == B ? LHS : RHS;
|
|
}
|
|
// Otherwise return "A op' V" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(OpcodeToExtract, A, V, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumFactor;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Use right distributivity, i.e. "(X op Y) op' Z = (X op' Z) op (Y op' Z)".
|
|
// Does the instruction have the form "(A op' B) op (C op' B)" or, in the
|
|
// commutative case, "(A op' B) op (B op' D)"?
|
|
if (B == D || (Instruction::isCommutative(OpcodeToExtract) && B == C)) {
|
|
Value *CC = B == D ? C : D;
|
|
// Form "(A op CC) op' B" if it simplifies completely..
|
|
// Does "A op CC" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, CC, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "V op' B" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals A then "V op' B" is just the LHS. If V equals CC then
|
|
// "V op' B" is just the RHS.
|
|
if (V == A || V == CC) {
|
|
++NumFactor;
|
|
return V == A ? LHS : RHS;
|
|
}
|
|
// Otherwise return "V op' B" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(OpcodeToExtract, V, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumFactor;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyAssociativeBinOp - Generic simplifications for associative binary
|
|
/// operations. Returns the simpler value, or null if none was found.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(unsigned Opc, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = (Instruction::BinaryOps)Opc;
|
|
assert(Instruction::isAssociative(Opcode) && "Not an associative operation!");
|
|
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS);
|
|
BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(RHS);
|
|
|
|
// Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "A op (B op C)" if it simplifies completely.
|
|
if (Op0 && Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
|
|
Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0);
|
|
Value *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
|
|
Value *C = RHS;
|
|
|
|
// Does "B op C" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, B, C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "A op V" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals B then "A op V" is just the LHS.
|
|
if (V == B) return LHS;
|
|
// Otherwise return "A op V" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, V, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "(A op B) op C" if it simplifies completely.
|
|
if (Op1 && Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
|
|
Value *A = LHS;
|
|
Value *B = Op1->getOperand(0);
|
|
Value *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
|
|
|
|
// Does "A op B" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "V op C" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals B then "V op C" is just the RHS.
|
|
if (V == B) return RHS;
|
|
// Otherwise return "V op C" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, V, C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The remaining transforms require commutativity as well as associativity.
|
|
if (!Instruction::isCommutative(Opcode))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "(C op A) op B" if it simplifies completely.
|
|
if (Op0 && Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
|
|
Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0);
|
|
Value *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
|
|
Value *C = RHS;
|
|
|
|
// Does "C op A" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, C, A, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "V op B" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals A then "V op B" is just the LHS.
|
|
if (V == A) return LHS;
|
|
// Otherwise return "V op B" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, V, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "B op (C op A)" if it simplifies completely.
|
|
if (Op1 && Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
|
|
Value *A = LHS;
|
|
Value *B = Op1->getOperand(0);
|
|
Value *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
|
|
|
|
// Does "C op A" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, C, A, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Return "B op V" if it simplifies or is already available.
|
|
// If V equals C then "B op V" is just the RHS.
|
|
if (V == C) return RHS;
|
|
// Otherwise return "B op V" if it simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, B, V, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ThreadBinOpOverSelect - In the case of a binary operation with a select
|
|
/// instruction as an operand, try to simplify the binop by seeing whether
|
|
/// evaluating it on both branches of the select results in the same value.
|
|
/// Returns the common value if so, otherwise returns null.
|
|
static Value *ThreadBinOpOverSelect(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
SelectInst *SI;
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(LHS)) {
|
|
SI = cast<SelectInst>(LHS);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert(isa<SelectInst>(RHS) && "No select instruction operand!");
|
|
SI = cast<SelectInst>(RHS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Evaluate the BinOp on the true and false branches of the select.
|
|
Value *TV;
|
|
Value *FV;
|
|
if (SI == LHS) {
|
|
TV = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, SI->getTrueValue(), RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
FV = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, SI->getFalseValue(), RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
} else {
|
|
TV = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, LHS, SI->getTrueValue(), TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
FV = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, LHS, SI->getFalseValue(), TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If they simplified to the same value, then return the common value.
|
|
// If they both failed to simplify then return null.
|
|
if (TV == FV)
|
|
return TV;
|
|
|
|
// If one branch simplified to undef, return the other one.
|
|
if (TV && isa<UndefValue>(TV))
|
|
return FV;
|
|
if (FV && isa<UndefValue>(FV))
|
|
return TV;
|
|
|
|
// If applying the operation did not change the true and false select values,
|
|
// then the result of the binop is the select itself.
|
|
if (TV == SI->getTrueValue() && FV == SI->getFalseValue())
|
|
return SI;
|
|
|
|
// If one branch simplified and the other did not, and the simplified
|
|
// value is equal to the unsimplified one, return the simplified value.
|
|
// For example, select (cond, X, X & Z) & Z -> X & Z.
|
|
if ((FV && !TV) || (TV && !FV)) {
|
|
// Check that the simplified value has the form "X op Y" where "op" is the
|
|
// same as the original operation.
|
|
Instruction *Simplified = dyn_cast<Instruction>(FV ? FV : TV);
|
|
if (Simplified && Simplified->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
|
|
// The value that didn't simplify is "UnsimplifiedLHS op UnsimplifiedRHS".
|
|
// We already know that "op" is the same as for the simplified value. See
|
|
// if the operands match too. If so, return the simplified value.
|
|
Value *UnsimplifiedBranch = FV ? SI->getTrueValue() : SI->getFalseValue();
|
|
Value *UnsimplifiedLHS = SI == LHS ? UnsimplifiedBranch : LHS;
|
|
Value *UnsimplifiedRHS = SI == LHS ? RHS : UnsimplifiedBranch;
|
|
if (Simplified->getOperand(0) == UnsimplifiedLHS &&
|
|
Simplified->getOperand(1) == UnsimplifiedRHS)
|
|
return Simplified;
|
|
if (Simplified->isCommutative() &&
|
|
Simplified->getOperand(1) == UnsimplifiedLHS &&
|
|
Simplified->getOperand(0) == UnsimplifiedRHS)
|
|
return Simplified;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ThreadCmpOverSelect - In the case of a comparison with a select instruction,
|
|
/// try to simplify the comparison by seeing whether both branches of the select
|
|
/// result in the same value. Returns the common value if so, otherwise returns
|
|
/// null.
|
|
static Value *ThreadCmpOverSelect(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *LHS,
|
|
Value *RHS, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the select is on the LHS.
|
|
if (!isa<SelectInst>(LHS)) {
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
Pred = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
}
|
|
assert(isa<SelectInst>(LHS) && "Not comparing with a select instruction!");
|
|
SelectInst *SI = cast<SelectInst>(LHS);
|
|
|
|
// Now that we have "cmp select(Cond, TV, FV), RHS", analyse it.
|
|
// Does "cmp TV, RHS" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *TCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, SI->getTrueValue(), RHS, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! Does "cmp FV, RHS" simplify?
|
|
if (Value *FCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, SI->getFalseValue(), RHS, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse)) {
|
|
// It does! If they simplified to the same value, then use it as the
|
|
// result of the original comparison.
|
|
if (TCmp == FCmp)
|
|
return TCmp;
|
|
Value *Cond = SI->getCondition();
|
|
// If the false value simplified to false, then the result of the compare
|
|
// is equal to "Cond && TCmp". This also catches the case when the false
|
|
// value simplified to false and the true value to true, returning "Cond".
|
|
if (match(FCmp, m_Zero()))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAndInst(Cond, TCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// If the true value simplified to true, then the result of the compare
|
|
// is equal to "Cond || FCmp".
|
|
if (match(TCmp, m_One()))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyOrInst(Cond, FCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// Finally, if the false value simplified to true and the true value to
|
|
// false, then the result of the compare is equal to "!Cond".
|
|
if (match(FCmp, m_One()) && match(TCmp, m_Zero()))
|
|
if (Value *V =
|
|
SimplifyXorInst(Cond, Constant::getAllOnesValue(Cond->getType()),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ThreadBinOpOverPHI - In the case of a binary operation with an operand that
|
|
/// is a PHI instruction, try to simplify the binop by seeing whether evaluating
|
|
/// it on the incoming phi values yields the same result for every value. If so
|
|
/// returns the common value, otherwise returns null.
|
|
static Value *ThreadBinOpOverPHI(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
PHINode *PI;
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(LHS)) {
|
|
PI = cast<PHINode>(LHS);
|
|
// Bail out if RHS and the phi may be mutually interdependent due to a loop.
|
|
if (!ValueDominatesPHI(RHS, PI, DT))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert(isa<PHINode>(RHS) && "No PHI instruction operand!");
|
|
PI = cast<PHINode>(RHS);
|
|
// Bail out if LHS and the phi may be mutually interdependent due to a loop.
|
|
if (!ValueDominatesPHI(LHS, PI, DT))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Evaluate the BinOp on the incoming phi values.
|
|
Value *CommonValue = 0;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PI->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Value *Incoming = PI->getIncomingValue(i);
|
|
// If the incoming value is the phi node itself, it can safely be skipped.
|
|
if (Incoming == PI) continue;
|
|
Value *V = PI == LHS ?
|
|
SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, Incoming, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse) :
|
|
SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, LHS, Incoming, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
// If the operation failed to simplify, or simplified to a different value
|
|
// to previously, then give up.
|
|
if (!V || (CommonValue && V != CommonValue))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
CommonValue = V;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return CommonValue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ThreadCmpOverPHI - In the case of a comparison with a PHI instruction, try
|
|
/// try to simplify the comparison by seeing whether comparing with all of the
|
|
/// incoming phi values yields the same result every time. If so returns the
|
|
/// common result, otherwise returns null.
|
|
static Value *ThreadCmpOverPHI(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
// Recursion is always used, so bail out at once if we already hit the limit.
|
|
if (!MaxRecurse--)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the phi is on the LHS.
|
|
if (!isa<PHINode>(LHS)) {
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
Pred = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
}
|
|
assert(isa<PHINode>(LHS) && "Not comparing with a phi instruction!");
|
|
PHINode *PI = cast<PHINode>(LHS);
|
|
|
|
// Bail out if RHS and the phi may be mutually interdependent due to a loop.
|
|
if (!ValueDominatesPHI(RHS, PI, DT))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// Evaluate the BinOp on the incoming phi values.
|
|
Value *CommonValue = 0;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PI->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Value *Incoming = PI->getIncomingValue(i);
|
|
// If the incoming value is the phi node itself, it can safely be skipped.
|
|
if (Incoming == PI) continue;
|
|
Value *V = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, Incoming, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
// If the operation failed to simplify, or simplified to a different value
|
|
// to previously, then give up.
|
|
if (!V || (CommonValue && V != CommonValue))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
CommonValue = V;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return CommonValue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyAddInst - Given operands for an Add, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyAddInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::Add, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize the constant to the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X + undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// X + 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X + (Y - X) -> Y
|
|
// (Y - X) + X -> Y
|
|
// Eg: X + -X -> 0
|
|
Value *Y = 0;
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Sub(m_Value(Y), m_Specific(Op0))) ||
|
|
match(Op0, m_Sub(m_Value(Y), m_Specific(Op1))))
|
|
return Y;
|
|
|
|
// X + ~X -> -1 since ~X = -X-1
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Not(m_Specific(Op1))) ||
|
|
match(Op1, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0))))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
/// i1 add -> xor.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && Op0->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyXorInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Try some generic simplifications for associative operations.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Instruction::Add, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Mul distributes over Add. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = FactorizeBinOp(Instruction::Add, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Mul,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Threading Add over selects and phi nodes is pointless, so don't bother.
|
|
// Threading over the select in "A + select(cond, B, C)" means evaluating
|
|
// "A+B" and "A+C" and seeing if they are equal; but they are equal if and
|
|
// only if B and C are equal. If B and C are equal then (since we assume
|
|
// that operands have already been simplified) "select(cond, B, C)" should
|
|
// have been simplified to the common value of B and C already. Analysing
|
|
// "A+B" and "A+C" thus gains nothing, but costs compile time. Similarly
|
|
// for threading over phi nodes.
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyAddInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyAddInst(Op0, Op1, isNSW, isNUW, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifySubInst - Given operands for a Sub, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifySubInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0))
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::Sub, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X - undef -> undef
|
|
// undef - X -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()) || match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return UndefValue::get(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X - 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X - X -> 0
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (X*2) - X -> X
|
|
// (X<<1) - X -> X
|
|
Value *X = 0;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Mul(m_Specific(Op1), m_ConstantInt<2>())) ||
|
|
match(Op0, m_Shl(m_Specific(Op1), m_One())))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// (X + Y) - Z -> X + (Y - Z) or Y + (X - Z) if everything simplifies.
|
|
// For example, (X + Y) - Y -> X; (Y + X) - Y -> X
|
|
Value *Y = 0, *Z = Op1;
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y)))) { // (X + Y) - Z
|
|
// See if "V === Y - Z" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, Y, Z, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
// It does! Now see if "X + V" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Add, X, V, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1)) {
|
|
// It does, we successfully reassociated!
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
// See if "V === X - Z" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, X, Z, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
// It does! Now see if "Y + V" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Add, Y, V, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1)) {
|
|
// It does, we successfully reassociated!
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X - (Y + Z) -> (X - Y) - Z or (X - Z) - Y if everything simplifies.
|
|
// For example, X - (X + 1) -> -1
|
|
X = Op0;
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && match(Op1, m_Add(m_Value(Y), m_Value(Z)))) { // X - (Y + Z)
|
|
// See if "V === X - Y" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, X, Y, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
// It does! Now see if "V - Z" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, V, Z, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1)) {
|
|
// It does, we successfully reassociated!
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
// See if "V === X - Z" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, X, Z, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
// It does! Now see if "V - Y" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, V, Y, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1)) {
|
|
// It does, we successfully reassociated!
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Z - (X - Y) -> (Z - X) + Y if everything simplifies.
|
|
// For example, X - (X - Y) -> Y.
|
|
Z = Op0;
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && match(Op1, m_Sub(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y)))) // Z - (X - Y)
|
|
// See if "V === Z - X" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Sub, Z, X, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
// It does! Now see if "V + Y" simplifies.
|
|
if (Value *W = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Add, V, Y, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1)) {
|
|
// It does, we successfully reassociated!
|
|
++NumReassoc;
|
|
return W;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mul distributes over Sub. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = FactorizeBinOp(Instruction::Sub, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Mul,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// i1 sub -> xor.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && Op0->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyXorInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Threading Sub over selects and phi nodes is pointless, so don't bother.
|
|
// Threading over the select in "A - select(cond, B, C)" means evaluating
|
|
// "A-B" and "A-C" and seeing if they are equal; but they are equal if and
|
|
// only if B and C are equal. If B and C are equal then (since we assume
|
|
// that operands have already been simplified) "select(cond, B, C)" should
|
|
// have been simplified to the common value of B and C already. Analysing
|
|
// "A-B" and "A-C" thus gains nothing, but costs compile time. Similarly
|
|
// for threading over phi nodes.
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifySubInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifySubInst(Op0, Op1, isNSW, isNUW, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyMulInst - Given operands for a Mul, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyMulInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::Mul, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize the constant to the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X * undef -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X * 0 -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// X * 1 -> X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_One()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// (X / Y) * Y -> X if the division is exact.
|
|
Value *X = 0, *Y = 0;
|
|
if ((match(Op0, m_IDiv(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))) && Y == Op1) || // (X / Y) * Y
|
|
(match(Op1, m_IDiv(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))) && Y == Op0)) { // Y * (X / Y)
|
|
BinaryOperator *Div = cast<BinaryOperator>(Y == Op1 ? Op0 : Op1);
|
|
if (Div->isExact())
|
|
return X;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// i1 mul -> and.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && Op0->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAndInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Try some generic simplifications for associative operations.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Instruction::Mul, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Mul distributes over Add. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExpandBinOp(Instruction::Mul, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Add,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Instruction::Mul, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Instruction::Mul, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyMulInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyMulInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyDiv - Given operands for an SDiv or UDiv, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyDiv(Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode, Value *Op0, Value *Op1,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *C0 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { C0, C1 };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Opcode, C0->getType(), Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool isSigned = Opcode == Instruction::SDiv;
|
|
|
|
// X / undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// undef / X -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// 0 / X -> 0, we don't need to preserve faults!
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X / 1 -> X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_One()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
if (Op0->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
|
|
// It can't be division by zero, hence it must be division by one.
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X / X -> 1
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(Op0->getType(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// (X * Y) / Y -> X if the multiplication does not overflow.
|
|
Value *X = 0, *Y = 0;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Mul(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))) && (X == Op1 || Y == Op1)) {
|
|
if (Y != Op1) std::swap(X, Y); // Ensure expression is (X * Y) / Y, Y = Op1
|
|
BinaryOperator *Mul = cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0);
|
|
// If the Mul knows it does not overflow, then we are good to go.
|
|
if ((isSigned && Mul->hasNoSignedWrap()) ||
|
|
(!isSigned && Mul->hasNoUnsignedWrap()))
|
|
return X;
|
|
// If X has the form X = A / Y then X * Y cannot overflow.
|
|
if (BinaryOperator *Div = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(X))
|
|
if (Div->getOpcode() == Opcode && Div->getOperand(1) == Y)
|
|
return X;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// (X rem Y) / Y -> 0
|
|
if ((isSigned && match(Op0, m_SRem(m_Value(), m_Specific(Op1)))) ||
|
|
(!isSigned && match(Op0, m_URem(m_Value(), m_Specific(Op1)))))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifySDivInst - Given operands for an SDiv, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifySDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyDiv(Instruction::SDiv, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifySDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifySDivInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyUDivInst - Given operands for a UDiv, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyUDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyDiv(Instruction::UDiv, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyUDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyUDivInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Value *SimplifyFDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned) {
|
|
// undef / X -> undef (the undef could be a snan).
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X / undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyFDivInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyFDivInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyRem - Given operands for an SRem or URem, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyRem(Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode, Value *Op0, Value *Op1,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *C0 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { C0, C1 };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Opcode, C0->getType(), Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X % undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// undef % X -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// 0 % X -> 0, we don't need to preserve faults!
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X % 0 -> undef, we don't need to preserve faults!
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return UndefValue::get(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X % 1 -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_One()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
if (Op0->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
|
|
// It can't be remainder by zero, hence it must be remainder by one.
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X % X -> 0
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifySRemInst - Given operands for an SRem, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifySRemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyRem(Instruction::SRem, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifySRemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifySRemInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyURemInst - Given operands for a URem, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyURemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyRem(Instruction::URem, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyURemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyURemInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Value *SimplifyFRemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *, unsigned) {
|
|
// undef % X -> undef (the undef could be a snan).
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X % undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyFRemInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyFRemInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyShift - Given operands for an Shl, LShr or AShr, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyShift(unsigned Opcode, Value *Op0, Value *Op1,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *C0 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { C0, C1 };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Opcode, C0->getType(), Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 0 shift by X -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X shift by 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X shift by undef -> undef because it may shift by the bitwidth.
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// Shifting by the bitwidth or more is undefined.
|
|
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1))
|
|
if (CI->getValue().getLimitedValue() >=
|
|
Op0->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits())
|
|
return UndefValue::get(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Opcode, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyShlInst - Given operands for an Shl, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyShlInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyShift(Instruction::Shl, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// undef << X -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (X >> A) << A -> X
|
|
Value *X;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Shr(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op1))) &&
|
|
cast<PossiblyExactOperator>(Op0)->isExact())
|
|
return X;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyShlInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isNSW, bool isNUW,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyShlInst(Op0, Op1, isNSW, isNUW, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyLShrInst - Given operands for an LShr, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyLShrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isExact,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyShift(Instruction::LShr, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// undef >>l X -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (X << A) >> A -> X
|
|
Value *X;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Shl(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op1))) &&
|
|
cast<OverflowingBinaryOperator>(Op0)->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
|
|
return X;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyLShrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isExact,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyLShrInst(Op0, Op1, isExact, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyAShrInst - Given operands for an AShr, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyAShrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isExact,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyShift(Instruction::AShr, Op0, Op1, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// all ones >>a X -> all ones
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_AllOnes()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// undef >>a X -> all ones
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (X << A) >> A -> X
|
|
Value *X;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Shl(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op1))) &&
|
|
cast<OverflowingBinaryOperator>(Op0)->hasNoSignedWrap())
|
|
return X;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyAShrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, bool isExact,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyAShrInst(Op0, Op1, isExact, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyAndInst - Given operands for an And, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyAndInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::And, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize the constant to the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X & undef -> 0
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X & X = X
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X & 0 = 0
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// X & -1 = X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_AllOnes()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// A & ~A = ~A & A = 0
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Not(m_Specific(Op1))) ||
|
|
match(Op1, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0))))
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (A | ?) & A = A
|
|
Value *A = 0, *B = 0;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Or(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == Op1 || B == Op1))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// A & (A | ?) = A
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Or(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == Op0 || B == Op0))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// Try some generic simplifications for associative operations.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// And distributes over Or. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExpandBinOp(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Or,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// And distributes over Xor. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExpandBinOp(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Xor,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Or distributes over And. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = FactorizeBinOp(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, Instruction::Or,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Instruction::And, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyAndInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyAndInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyOrInst - Given operands for an Or, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyOrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::Or, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize the constant to the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// X | undef -> -1
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// X | X = X
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X | 0 = X
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// X | -1 = -1
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_AllOnes()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// A | ~A = ~A | A = -1
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Not(m_Specific(Op1))) ||
|
|
match(Op1, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0))))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// (A & ?) | A = A
|
|
Value *A = 0, *B = 0;
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == Op1 || B == Op1))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// A | (A & ?) = A
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == Op0 || B == Op0))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// ~(A & ?) | A = -1
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Not(m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) &&
|
|
(A == Op1 || B == Op1))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op1->getType());
|
|
|
|
// A | ~(A & ?) = -1
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Not(m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) &&
|
|
(A == Op0 || B == Op0))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// Try some generic simplifications for associative operations.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Instruction::Or, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Or distributes over And. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExpandBinOp(Instruction::Or, Op0, Op1, Instruction::And,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// And distributes over Or. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = FactorizeBinOp(Instruction::Or, Op0, Op1, Instruction::And,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(Op0) || isa<SelectInst>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Instruction::Or, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Op0) || isa<PHINode>(Op1))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Instruction::Or, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyOrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyOrInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyXorInst - Given operands for a Xor, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyXorInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT, unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op0)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
|
|
Constant *Ops[] = { CLHS, CRHS };
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Instruction::Xor, CLHS->getType(),
|
|
Ops, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize the constant to the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A ^ undef -> undef
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Op1;
|
|
|
|
// A ^ 0 = A
|
|
if (match(Op1, m_Zero()))
|
|
return Op0;
|
|
|
|
// A ^ A = 0
|
|
if (Op0 == Op1)
|
|
return Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// A ^ ~A = ~A ^ A = -1
|
|
if (match(Op0, m_Not(m_Specific(Op1))) ||
|
|
match(Op1, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0))))
|
|
return Constant::getAllOnesValue(Op0->getType());
|
|
|
|
// Try some generic simplifications for associative operations.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Instruction::Xor, Op0, Op1, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// And distributes over Xor. Try some generic simplifications based on this.
|
|
if (Value *V = FactorizeBinOp(Instruction::Xor, Op0, Op1, Instruction::And,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Threading Xor over selects and phi nodes is pointless, so don't bother.
|
|
// Threading over the select in "A ^ select(cond, B, C)" means evaluating
|
|
// "A^B" and "A^C" and seeing if they are equal; but they are equal if and
|
|
// only if B and C are equal. If B and C are equal then (since we assume
|
|
// that operands have already been simplified) "select(cond, B, C)" should
|
|
// have been simplified to the common value of B and C already. Analysing
|
|
// "A^B" and "A^C" thus gains nothing, but costs compile time. Similarly
|
|
// for threading over phi nodes.
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyXorInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyXorInst(Op0, Op1, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Type *GetCompareTy(Value *Op) {
|
|
return CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Op->getType());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ExtractEquivalentCondition - Rummage around inside V looking for something
|
|
/// equivalent to the comparison "LHS Pred RHS". Return such a value if found,
|
|
/// otherwise return null. Helper function for analyzing max/min idioms.
|
|
static Value *ExtractEquivalentCondition(Value *V, CmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
|
Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
|
|
SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(V);
|
|
if (!SI)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
CmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(SI->getCondition());
|
|
if (!Cmp)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
Value *CmpLHS = Cmp->getOperand(0), *CmpRHS = Cmp->getOperand(1);
|
|
if (Pred == Cmp->getPredicate() && LHS == CmpLHS && RHS == CmpRHS)
|
|
return Cmp;
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Cmp->getPredicate()) &&
|
|
LHS == CmpRHS && RHS == CmpLHS)
|
|
return Cmp;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyICmpInst - Given operands for an ICmpInst, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = (CmpInst::Predicate)Predicate;
|
|
assert(CmpInst::isIntPredicate(Pred) && "Not an integer compare!");
|
|
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(RHS))
|
|
return ConstantFoldCompareInstOperands(Pred, CLHS, CRHS, TD);
|
|
|
|
// If we have a constant, make sure it is on the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
Pred = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Type *ITy = GetCompareTy(LHS); // The return type.
|
|
Type *OpTy = LHS->getType(); // The operand type.
|
|
|
|
// icmp X, X -> true/false
|
|
// X icmp undef -> true/false. For example, icmp ugt %X, undef -> false
|
|
// because X could be 0.
|
|
if (LHS == RHS || isa<UndefValue>(RHS))
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(ITy, CmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred));
|
|
|
|
// Special case logic when the operands have i1 type.
|
|
if (OpTy->isIntegerTy(1) || (OpTy->isVectorTy() &&
|
|
cast<VectorType>(OpTy)->getElementType()->isIntegerTy(1))) {
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default: break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
// X == 1 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_One()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
// X != 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_Zero()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
// X >u 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_Zero()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
// X >=u 1 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_One()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
// X <s 0 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_Zero()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
// X <=s -1 -> X
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_One()))
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// icmp <alloca*>, <global/alloca*/null> - Different stack variables have
|
|
// different addresses, and what's more the address of a stack variable is
|
|
// never null or equal to the address of a global. Note that generalizing
|
|
// to the case where LHS is a global variable address or null is pointless,
|
|
// since if both LHS and RHS are constants then we already constant folded
|
|
// the compare, and if only one of them is then we moved it to RHS already.
|
|
if (isa<AllocaInst>(LHS) && (isa<GlobalValue>(RHS) || isa<AllocaInst>(RHS) ||
|
|
isa<ConstantPointerNull>(RHS)))
|
|
// We already know that LHS != RHS.
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(ITy, CmpInst::isFalseWhenEqual(Pred));
|
|
|
|
// If we are comparing with zero then try hard since this is a common case.
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_Zero())) {
|
|
bool LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative;
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
assert(false && "Unknown ICmp predicate!");
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
if (isKnownNonZero(LHS, TD))
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
if (isKnownNonZero(LHS, TD))
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNegative)
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNonNegative)
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNegative)
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNonNegative && isKnownNonZero(LHS, TD))
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNegative)
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNonNegative)
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNegative)
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
if (LHSKnownNonNegative && isKnownNonZero(LHS, TD))
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// See if we are doing a comparison with a constant integer.
|
|
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS)) {
|
|
// Rule out tautological comparisons (eg., ult 0 or uge 0).
|
|
ConstantRange RHS_CR = ICmpInst::makeConstantRange(Pred, CI->getValue());
|
|
if (RHS_CR.isEmptySet())
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext());
|
|
if (RHS_CR.isFullSet())
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
// Many binary operators with constant RHS have easy to compute constant
|
|
// range. Use them to check whether the comparison is a tautology.
|
|
uint32_t Width = CI->getBitWidth();
|
|
APInt Lower = APInt(Width, 0);
|
|
APInt Upper = APInt(Width, 0);
|
|
ConstantInt *CI2;
|
|
if (match(LHS, m_URem(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'urem x, CI2' produces [0, CI2).
|
|
Upper = CI2->getValue();
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_SRem(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'srem x, CI2' produces (-|CI2|, |CI2|).
|
|
Upper = CI2->getValue().abs();
|
|
Lower = (-Upper) + 1;
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_UDiv(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'udiv x, CI2' produces [0, UINT_MAX / CI2].
|
|
APInt NegOne = APInt::getAllOnesValue(Width);
|
|
if (!CI2->isZero())
|
|
Upper = NegOne.udiv(CI2->getValue()) + 1;
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_SDiv(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'sdiv x, CI2' produces [INT_MIN / CI2, INT_MAX / CI2].
|
|
APInt IntMin = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width);
|
|
APInt IntMax = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width);
|
|
APInt Val = CI2->getValue().abs();
|
|
if (!Val.isMinValue()) {
|
|
Lower = IntMin.sdiv(Val);
|
|
Upper = IntMax.sdiv(Val) + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_LShr(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'lshr x, CI2' produces [0, UINT_MAX >> CI2].
|
|
APInt NegOne = APInt::getAllOnesValue(Width);
|
|
if (CI2->getValue().ult(Width))
|
|
Upper = NegOne.lshr(CI2->getValue()) + 1;
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_AShr(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'ashr x, CI2' produces [INT_MIN >> CI2, INT_MAX >> CI2].
|
|
APInt IntMin = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width);
|
|
APInt IntMax = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width);
|
|
if (CI2->getValue().ult(Width)) {
|
|
Lower = IntMin.ashr(CI2->getValue());
|
|
Upper = IntMax.ashr(CI2->getValue()) + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_Or(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'or x, CI2' produces [CI2, UINT_MAX].
|
|
Lower = CI2->getValue();
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_And(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) {
|
|
// 'and x, CI2' produces [0, CI2].
|
|
Upper = CI2->getValue() + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
if (Lower != Upper) {
|
|
ConstantRange LHS_CR = ConstantRange(Lower, Upper);
|
|
if (RHS_CR.contains(LHS_CR))
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(RHS->getContext());
|
|
if (RHS_CR.inverse().contains(LHS_CR))
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(RHS->getContext());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Compare of cast, for example (zext X) != 0 -> X != 0
|
|
if (isa<CastInst>(LHS) && (isa<Constant>(RHS) || isa<CastInst>(RHS))) {
|
|
Instruction *LI = cast<CastInst>(LHS);
|
|
Value *SrcOp = LI->getOperand(0);
|
|
Type *SrcTy = SrcOp->getType();
|
|
Type *DstTy = LI->getType();
|
|
|
|
// Turn icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/constant) into a compare of the input
|
|
// if the integer type is the same size as the pointer type.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && TD && isa<PtrToIntInst>(LI) &&
|
|
TD->getPointerSizeInBits() == DstTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits()) {
|
|
if (Constant *RHSC = dyn_cast<Constant>(RHS)) {
|
|
// Transfer the cast to the constant.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, SrcOp,
|
|
ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(RHSC, SrcTy),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
} else if (PtrToIntInst *RI = dyn_cast<PtrToIntInst>(RHS)) {
|
|
if (RI->getOperand(0)->getType() == SrcTy)
|
|
// Compare without the cast.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, SrcOp, RI->getOperand(0),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isa<ZExtInst>(LHS)) {
|
|
// Turn icmp (zext X), (zext Y) into a compare of X and Y if they have the
|
|
// same type.
|
|
if (ZExtInst *RI = dyn_cast<ZExtInst>(RHS)) {
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && SrcTy == RI->getOperand(0)->getType())
|
|
// Compare X and Y. Note that signed predicates become unsigned.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(ICmpInst::getUnsignedPredicate(Pred),
|
|
SrcOp, RI->getOperand(0), TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
// Turn icmp (zext X), Cst into a compare of X and Cst if Cst is extended
|
|
// too. If not, then try to deduce the result of the comparison.
|
|
else if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS)) {
|
|
// Compute the constant that would happen if we truncated to SrcTy then
|
|
// reextended to DstTy.
|
|
Constant *Trunc = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(CI, SrcTy);
|
|
Constant *RExt = ConstantExpr::getCast(CastInst::ZExt, Trunc, DstTy);
|
|
|
|
// If the re-extended constant didn't change then this is effectively
|
|
// also a case of comparing two zero-extended values.
|
|
if (RExt == CI && MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(ICmpInst::getUnsignedPredicate(Pred),
|
|
SrcOp, Trunc, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise the upper bits of LHS are zero while RHS has a non-zero bit
|
|
// there. Use this to work out the result of the comparison.
|
|
if (RExt != CI) {
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
assert(false && "Unknown ICmp predicate!");
|
|
// LHS <u RHS.
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
// LHS is non-negative. If RHS is negative then LHS >s LHS. If RHS
|
|
// is non-negative then LHS <s RHS.
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
return CI->getValue().isNegative() ?
|
|
ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext()) :
|
|
ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
return CI->getValue().isNegative() ?
|
|
ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext()) :
|
|
ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isa<SExtInst>(LHS)) {
|
|
// Turn icmp (sext X), (sext Y) into a compare of X and Y if they have the
|
|
// same type.
|
|
if (SExtInst *RI = dyn_cast<SExtInst>(RHS)) {
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && SrcTy == RI->getOperand(0)->getType())
|
|
// Compare X and Y. Note that the predicate does not change.
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, SrcOp, RI->getOperand(0),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
// Turn icmp (sext X), Cst into a compare of X and Cst if Cst is extended
|
|
// too. If not, then try to deduce the result of the comparison.
|
|
else if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS)) {
|
|
// Compute the constant that would happen if we truncated to SrcTy then
|
|
// reextended to DstTy.
|
|
Constant *Trunc = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(CI, SrcTy);
|
|
Constant *RExt = ConstantExpr::getCast(CastInst::SExt, Trunc, DstTy);
|
|
|
|
// If the re-extended constant didn't change then this is effectively
|
|
// also a case of comparing two sign-extended values.
|
|
if (RExt == CI && MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, SrcOp, Trunc, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise the upper bits of LHS are all equal, while RHS has varying
|
|
// bits there. Use this to work out the result of the comparison.
|
|
if (RExt != CI) {
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
assert(false && "Unknown ICmp predicate!");
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext());
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
// If RHS is non-negative then LHS <s RHS. If RHS is negative then
|
|
// LHS >s RHS.
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
return CI->getValue().isNegative() ?
|
|
ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext()) :
|
|
ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext());
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
return CI->getValue().isNegative() ?
|
|
ConstantInt::getFalse(CI->getContext()) :
|
|
ConstantInt::getTrue(CI->getContext());
|
|
|
|
// If LHS is non-negative then LHS <u RHS. If LHS is negative then
|
|
// LHS >u RHS.
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
// Comparison is true iff the LHS <s 0.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, SrcOp,
|
|
Constant::getNullValue(SrcTy),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
// Comparison is true iff the LHS >=s 0.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, SrcOp,
|
|
Constant::getNullValue(SrcTy),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Special logic for binary operators.
|
|
BinaryOperator *LBO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS);
|
|
BinaryOperator *RBO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(RHS);
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && (LBO || RBO)) {
|
|
// Analyze the case when either LHS or RHS is an add instruction.
|
|
Value *A = 0, *B = 0, *C = 0, *D = 0;
|
|
// LHS = A + B (or A and B are null); RHS = C + D (or C and D are null).
|
|
bool NoLHSWrapProblem = false, NoRHSWrapProblem = false;
|
|
if (LBO && LBO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add) {
|
|
A = LBO->getOperand(0); B = LBO->getOperand(1);
|
|
NoLHSWrapProblem = ICmpInst::isEquality(Pred) ||
|
|
(CmpInst::isUnsigned(Pred) && LBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) ||
|
|
(CmpInst::isSigned(Pred) && LBO->hasNoSignedWrap());
|
|
}
|
|
if (RBO && RBO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add) {
|
|
C = RBO->getOperand(0); D = RBO->getOperand(1);
|
|
NoRHSWrapProblem = ICmpInst::isEquality(Pred) ||
|
|
(CmpInst::isUnsigned(Pred) && RBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) ||
|
|
(CmpInst::isSigned(Pred) && RBO->hasNoSignedWrap());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// icmp (X+Y), X -> icmp Y, 0 for equalities or if there is no overflow.
|
|
if ((A == RHS || B == RHS) && NoLHSWrapProblem)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, A == RHS ? B : A,
|
|
Constant::getNullValue(RHS->getType()),
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// icmp X, (X+Y) -> icmp 0, Y for equalities or if there is no overflow.
|
|
if ((C == LHS || D == LHS) && NoRHSWrapProblem)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred,
|
|
Constant::getNullValue(LHS->getType()),
|
|
C == LHS ? D : C, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// icmp (X+Y), (X+Z) -> icmp Y,Z for equalities or if there is no overflow.
|
|
if (A && C && (A == C || A == D || B == C || B == D) &&
|
|
NoLHSWrapProblem && NoRHSWrapProblem) {
|
|
// Determine Y and Z in the form icmp (X+Y), (X+Z).
|
|
Value *Y = (A == C || A == D) ? B : A;
|
|
Value *Z = (C == A || C == B) ? D : C;
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, Y, Z, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (LBO && match(LBO, m_URem(m_Value(), m_Specific(RHS)))) {
|
|
bool KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative;
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (!KnownNonNegative)
|
|
break;
|
|
// fall-through
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(LHS, KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (!KnownNonNegative)
|
|
break;
|
|
// fall-through
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (RBO && match(RBO, m_URem(m_Value(), m_Specific(LHS)))) {
|
|
bool KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative;
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(RHS, KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (!KnownNonNegative)
|
|
break;
|
|
// fall-through
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
ComputeSignBit(RHS, KnownNonNegative, KnownNegative, TD);
|
|
if (!KnownNonNegative)
|
|
break;
|
|
// fall-through
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (MaxRecurse && LBO && RBO && LBO->getOpcode() == RBO->getOpcode() &&
|
|
LBO->getOperand(1) == RBO->getOperand(1)) {
|
|
switch (LBO->getOpcode()) {
|
|
default: break;
|
|
case Instruction::UDiv:
|
|
case Instruction::LShr:
|
|
if (ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred))
|
|
break;
|
|
// fall-through
|
|
case Instruction::SDiv:
|
|
case Instruction::AShr:
|
|
if (!LBO->isExact() || !RBO->isExact())
|
|
break;
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, LBO->getOperand(0),
|
|
RBO->getOperand(0), TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Shl: {
|
|
bool NUW = LBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && RBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap();
|
|
bool NSW = LBO->hasNoSignedWrap() && RBO->hasNoSignedWrap();
|
|
if (!NUW && !NSW)
|
|
break;
|
|
if (!NSW && ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred))
|
|
break;
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, LBO->getOperand(0),
|
|
RBO->getOperand(0), TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Simplify comparisons involving max/min.
|
|
Value *A, *B;
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate P = CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE;
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate EqP; // Chosen so that "A == max/min(A,B)" iff "A EqP B".
|
|
|
|
// Signed variants on "max(a,b)>=a -> true".
|
|
if (match(LHS, m_SMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && (A == RHS || B == RHS)) {
|
|
if (A != RHS) std::swap(A, B); // smax(A, B) pred A.
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_SGE; // "A == smax(A, B)" iff "A sge B".
|
|
// We analyze this as smax(A, B) pred A.
|
|
P = Pred;
|
|
} else if (match(RHS, m_SMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == LHS || B == LHS)) {
|
|
if (A != LHS) std::swap(A, B); // A pred smax(A, B).
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_SGE; // "A == smax(A, B)" iff "A sge B".
|
|
// We analyze this as smax(A, B) swapped-pred A.
|
|
P = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_SMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == RHS || B == RHS)) {
|
|
if (A != RHS) std::swap(A, B); // smin(A, B) pred A.
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_SLE; // "A == smin(A, B)" iff "A sle B".
|
|
// We analyze this as smax(-A, -B) swapped-pred -A.
|
|
// Note that we do not need to actually form -A or -B thanks to EqP.
|
|
P = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
} else if (match(RHS, m_SMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == LHS || B == LHS)) {
|
|
if (A != LHS) std::swap(A, B); // A pred smin(A, B).
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_SLE; // "A == smin(A, B)" iff "A sle B".
|
|
// We analyze this as smax(-A, -B) pred -A.
|
|
// Note that we do not need to actually form -A or -B thanks to EqP.
|
|
P = Pred;
|
|
}
|
|
if (P != CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE) {
|
|
// Cases correspond to "max(A, B) p A".
|
|
switch (P) {
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
// Equivalent to "A EqP B". This may be the same as the condition tested
|
|
// in the max/min; if so, we can just return that.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(LHS, EqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(RHS, EqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// Otherwise, see if "A EqP B" simplifies.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(EqP, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_SGT: {
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate InvEqP = CmpInst::getInversePredicate(EqP);
|
|
// Equivalent to "A InvEqP B". This may be the same as the condition
|
|
// tested in the max/min; if so, we can just return that.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(LHS, InvEqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(RHS, InvEqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// Otherwise, see if "A InvEqP B" simplifies.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(InvEqP, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Unsigned variants on "max(a,b)>=a -> true".
|
|
P = CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE;
|
|
if (match(LHS, m_UMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && (A == RHS || B == RHS)) {
|
|
if (A != RHS) std::swap(A, B); // umax(A, B) pred A.
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_UGE; // "A == umax(A, B)" iff "A uge B".
|
|
// We analyze this as umax(A, B) pred A.
|
|
P = Pred;
|
|
} else if (match(RHS, m_UMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == LHS || B == LHS)) {
|
|
if (A != LHS) std::swap(A, B); // A pred umax(A, B).
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_UGE; // "A == umax(A, B)" iff "A uge B".
|
|
// We analyze this as umax(A, B) swapped-pred A.
|
|
P = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_UMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == RHS || B == RHS)) {
|
|
if (A != RHS) std::swap(A, B); // umin(A, B) pred A.
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_ULE; // "A == umin(A, B)" iff "A ule B".
|
|
// We analyze this as umax(-A, -B) swapped-pred -A.
|
|
// Note that we do not need to actually form -A or -B thanks to EqP.
|
|
P = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
} else if (match(RHS, m_UMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
(A == LHS || B == LHS)) {
|
|
if (A != LHS) std::swap(A, B); // A pred umin(A, B).
|
|
EqP = CmpInst::ICMP_ULE; // "A == umin(A, B)" iff "A ule B".
|
|
// We analyze this as umax(-A, -B) pred -A.
|
|
// Note that we do not need to actually form -A or -B thanks to EqP.
|
|
P = Pred;
|
|
}
|
|
if (P != CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE) {
|
|
// Cases correspond to "max(A, B) p A".
|
|
switch (P) {
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
|
// Equivalent to "A EqP B". This may be the same as the condition tested
|
|
// in the max/min; if so, we can just return that.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(LHS, EqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(RHS, EqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// Otherwise, see if "A EqP B" simplifies.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(EqP, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_NE:
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_UGT: {
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate InvEqP = CmpInst::getInversePredicate(EqP);
|
|
// Equivalent to "A InvEqP B". This may be the same as the condition
|
|
// tested in the max/min; if so, we can just return that.
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(LHS, InvEqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
if (Value *V = ExtractEquivalentCondition(RHS, InvEqP, A, B))
|
|
return V;
|
|
// Otherwise, see if "A InvEqP B" simplifies.
|
|
if (MaxRecurse)
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(InvEqP, A, B, TD, DT, MaxRecurse-1))
|
|
return V;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Variants on "max(x,y) >= min(x,z)".
|
|
Value *C, *D;
|
|
if (match(LHS, m_SMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
match(RHS, m_SMin(m_Value(C), m_Value(D))) &&
|
|
(A == C || A == D || B == C || B == D)) {
|
|
// max(x, ?) pred min(x, ?).
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_SGE)
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_SLT)
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_SMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
match(RHS, m_SMax(m_Value(C), m_Value(D))) &&
|
|
(A == C || A == D || B == C || B == D)) {
|
|
// min(x, ?) pred max(x, ?).
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_SLE)
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_SGT)
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_UMax(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
match(RHS, m_UMin(m_Value(C), m_Value(D))) &&
|
|
(A == C || A == D || B == C || B == D)) {
|
|
// max(x, ?) pred min(x, ?).
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_UGE)
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULT)
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
} else if (match(LHS, m_UMin(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
|
|
match(RHS, m_UMax(m_Value(C), m_Value(D))) &&
|
|
(A == C || A == D || B == C || B == D)) {
|
|
// min(x, ?) pred max(x, ?).
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULE)
|
|
// Always true.
|
|
return getTrue(ITy);
|
|
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
|
|
// Always false.
|
|
return getFalse(ITy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the comparison is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// comparing with either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(LHS) || isa<SelectInst>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadCmpOverSelect(Pred, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the comparison is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// doing the compare with each incoming phi value yields a common result.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(LHS) || isa<PHINode>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadCmpOverPHI(Pred, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyICmpInst(Predicate, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyFCmpInst - Given operands for an FCmpInst, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyFCmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = (CmpInst::Predicate)Predicate;
|
|
assert(CmpInst::isFPPredicate(Pred) && "Not an FP compare!");
|
|
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(RHS))
|
|
return ConstantFoldCompareInstOperands(Pred, CLHS, CRHS, TD);
|
|
|
|
// If we have a constant, make sure it is on the RHS.
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
Pred = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fold trivial predicates.
|
|
if (Pred == FCmpInst::FCMP_FALSE)
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(GetCompareTy(LHS), 0);
|
|
if (Pred == FCmpInst::FCMP_TRUE)
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(GetCompareTy(LHS), 1);
|
|
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(RHS)) // fcmp pred X, undef -> undef
|
|
return UndefValue::get(GetCompareTy(LHS));
|
|
|
|
// fcmp x,x -> true/false. Not all compares are foldable.
|
|
if (LHS == RHS) {
|
|
if (CmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred))
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(GetCompareTy(LHS), 1);
|
|
if (CmpInst::isFalseWhenEqual(Pred))
|
|
return ConstantInt::get(GetCompareTy(LHS), 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Handle fcmp with constant RHS
|
|
if (Constant *RHSC = dyn_cast<Constant>(RHS)) {
|
|
// If the constant is a nan, see if we can fold the comparison based on it.
|
|
if (ConstantFP *CFP = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(RHSC)) {
|
|
if (CFP->getValueAPF().isNaN()) {
|
|
if (FCmpInst::isOrdered(Pred)) // True "if ordered and foo"
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CFP->getContext());
|
|
assert(FCmpInst::isUnordered(Pred) &&
|
|
"Comparison must be either ordered or unordered!");
|
|
// True if unordered.
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CFP->getContext());
|
|
}
|
|
// Check whether the constant is an infinity.
|
|
if (CFP->getValueAPF().isInfinity()) {
|
|
if (CFP->getValueAPF().isNegative()) {
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
case FCmpInst::FCMP_OLT:
|
|
// No value is ordered and less than negative infinity.
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CFP->getContext());
|
|
case FCmpInst::FCMP_UGE:
|
|
// All values are unordered with or at least negative infinity.
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CFP->getContext());
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
case FCmpInst::FCMP_OGT:
|
|
// No value is ordered and greater than infinity.
|
|
return ConstantInt::getFalse(CFP->getContext());
|
|
case FCmpInst::FCMP_ULE:
|
|
// All values are unordered with and at most infinity.
|
|
return ConstantInt::getTrue(CFP->getContext());
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the comparison is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// comparing with either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(LHS) || isa<SelectInst>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadCmpOverSelect(Pred, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the comparison is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// doing the compare with each incoming phi value yields a common result.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(LHS) || isa<PHINode>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadCmpOverPHI(Pred, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyFCmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyFCmpInst(Predicate, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifySelectInst - Given operands for a SelectInst, see if we can fold
|
|
/// the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifySelectInst(Value *CondVal, Value *TrueVal, Value *FalseVal,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *) {
|
|
// select true, X, Y -> X
|
|
// select false, X, Y -> Y
|
|
if (ConstantInt *CB = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(CondVal))
|
|
return CB->getZExtValue() ? TrueVal : FalseVal;
|
|
|
|
// select C, X, X -> X
|
|
if (TrueVal == FalseVal)
|
|
return TrueVal;
|
|
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(CondVal)) { // select undef, X, Y -> X or Y
|
|
if (isa<Constant>(TrueVal))
|
|
return TrueVal;
|
|
return FalseVal;
|
|
}
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(TrueVal)) // select C, undef, X -> X
|
|
return FalseVal;
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(FalseVal)) // select C, X, undef -> X
|
|
return TrueVal;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyGEPInst - Given operands for an GetElementPtrInst, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyGEPInst(ArrayRef<Value *> Ops,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *) {
|
|
// The type of the GEP pointer operand.
|
|
PointerType *PtrTy = cast<PointerType>(Ops[0]->getType());
|
|
|
|
// getelementptr P -> P.
|
|
if (Ops.size() == 1)
|
|
return Ops[0];
|
|
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(Ops[0])) {
|
|
// Compute the (pointer) type returned by the GEP instruction.
|
|
Type *LastType = GetElementPtrInst::getIndexedType(PtrTy, Ops.slice(1));
|
|
Type *GEPTy = PointerType::get(LastType, PtrTy->getAddressSpace());
|
|
return UndefValue::get(GEPTy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (Ops.size() == 2) {
|
|
// getelementptr P, 0 -> P.
|
|
if (ConstantInt *C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Ops[1]))
|
|
if (C->isZero())
|
|
return Ops[0];
|
|
// getelementptr P, N -> P if P points to a type of zero size.
|
|
if (TD) {
|
|
Type *Ty = PtrTy->getElementType();
|
|
if (Ty->isSized() && TD->getTypeAllocSize(Ty) == 0)
|
|
return Ops[0];
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check to see if this is constant foldable.
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
if (!isa<Constant>(Ops[i]))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
return ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr(cast<Constant>(Ops[0]), Ops.slice(1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyInsertValueInst - Given operands for an InsertValueInst, see if we
|
|
/// can fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyInsertValueInst(Value *Agg, Value *Val,
|
|
ArrayRef<unsigned> Idxs,
|
|
const TargetData *,
|
|
const DominatorTree *) {
|
|
if (Constant *CAgg = dyn_cast<Constant>(Agg))
|
|
if (Constant *CVal = dyn_cast<Constant>(Val))
|
|
return ConstantFoldInsertValueInstruction(CAgg, CVal, Idxs);
|
|
|
|
// insertvalue x, undef, n -> x
|
|
if (match(Val, m_Undef()))
|
|
return Agg;
|
|
|
|
// insertvalue x, (extractvalue y, n), n
|
|
if (ExtractValueInst *EV = dyn_cast<ExtractValueInst>(Val))
|
|
if (EV->getAggregateOperand()->getType() == Agg->getType() &&
|
|
EV->getIndices() == Idxs) {
|
|
// insertvalue undef, (extractvalue y, n), n -> y
|
|
if (match(Agg, m_Undef()))
|
|
return EV->getAggregateOperand();
|
|
|
|
// insertvalue y, (extractvalue y, n), n -> y
|
|
if (Agg == EV->getAggregateOperand())
|
|
return Agg;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyPHINode - See if we can fold the given phi. If not, returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyPHINode(PHINode *PN, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
// If all of the PHI's incoming values are the same then replace the PHI node
|
|
// with the common value.
|
|
Value *CommonValue = 0;
|
|
bool HasUndefInput = false;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Value *Incoming = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
|
|
// If the incoming value is the phi node itself, it can safely be skipped.
|
|
if (Incoming == PN) continue;
|
|
if (isa<UndefValue>(Incoming)) {
|
|
// Remember that we saw an undef value, but otherwise ignore them.
|
|
HasUndefInput = true;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if (CommonValue && Incoming != CommonValue)
|
|
return 0; // Not the same, bail out.
|
|
CommonValue = Incoming;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If CommonValue is null then all of the incoming values were either undef or
|
|
// equal to the phi node itself.
|
|
if (!CommonValue)
|
|
return UndefValue::get(PN->getType());
|
|
|
|
// If we have a PHI node like phi(X, undef, X), where X is defined by some
|
|
// instruction, we cannot return X as the result of the PHI node unless it
|
|
// dominates the PHI block.
|
|
if (HasUndefInput)
|
|
return ValueDominatesPHI(CommonValue, PN, DT) ? CommonValue : 0;
|
|
|
|
return CommonValue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
//=== Helper functions for higher up the class hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyBinOp - Given operands for a BinaryOperator, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result. If not, this returns null.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyBinOp(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
switch (Opcode) {
|
|
case Instruction::Add:
|
|
return SimplifyAddInst(LHS, RHS, /*isNSW*/false, /*isNUW*/false,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::Sub:
|
|
return SimplifySubInst(LHS, RHS, /*isNSW*/false, /*isNUW*/false,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::Mul: return SimplifyMulInst (LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::SDiv: return SimplifySDivInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::UDiv: return SimplifyUDivInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::FDiv: return SimplifyFDivInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::SRem: return SimplifySRemInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::URem: return SimplifyURemInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::FRem: return SimplifyFRemInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::Shl:
|
|
return SimplifyShlInst(LHS, RHS, /*isNSW*/false, /*isNUW*/false,
|
|
TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::LShr:
|
|
return SimplifyLShrInst(LHS, RHS, /*isExact*/false, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::AShr:
|
|
return SimplifyAShrInst(LHS, RHS, /*isExact*/false, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::And: return SimplifyAndInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::Or: return SimplifyOrInst (LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
case Instruction::Xor: return SimplifyXorInst(LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
default:
|
|
if (Constant *CLHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(LHS))
|
|
if (Constant *CRHS = dyn_cast<Constant>(RHS)) {
|
|
Constant *COps[] = {CLHS, CRHS};
|
|
return ConstantFoldInstOperands(Opcode, LHS->getType(), COps, TD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is associative, try some generic simplifications.
|
|
if (Instruction::isAssociative(Opcode))
|
|
if (Value *V = SimplifyAssociativeBinOp(Opcode, LHS, RHS, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a select instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on either branch of the select always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<SelectInst>(LHS) || isa<SelectInst>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverSelect(Opcode, LHS, RHS, TD, DT,
|
|
MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
// If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether
|
|
// operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(LHS) || isa<PHINode>(RHS))
|
|
if (Value *V = ThreadBinOpOverPHI(Opcode, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse))
|
|
return V;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyBinOp(unsigned Opcode, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyCmpInst - Given operands for a CmpInst, see if we can
|
|
/// fold the result.
|
|
static Value *SimplifyCmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT,
|
|
unsigned MaxRecurse) {
|
|
if (CmpInst::isIntPredicate((CmpInst::Predicate)Predicate))
|
|
return SimplifyICmpInst(Predicate, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
return SimplifyFCmpInst(Predicate, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyCmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
|
const TargetData *TD, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
return ::SimplifyCmpInst(Predicate, LHS, RHS, TD, DT, RecursionLimit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SimplifyInstruction - See if we can compute a simplified version of this
|
|
/// instruction. If not, this returns null.
|
|
Value *llvm::SimplifyInstruction(Instruction *I, const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
Value *Result;
|
|
|
|
switch (I->getOpcode()) {
|
|
default:
|
|
Result = ConstantFoldInstruction(I, TD);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Add:
|
|
Result = SimplifyAddInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoSignedWrap(),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoUnsignedWrap(),
|
|
TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Sub:
|
|
Result = SimplifySubInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoSignedWrap(),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoUnsignedWrap(),
|
|
TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Mul:
|
|
Result = SimplifyMulInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::SDiv:
|
|
Result = SimplifySDivInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::UDiv:
|
|
Result = SimplifyUDivInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::FDiv:
|
|
Result = SimplifyFDivInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::SRem:
|
|
Result = SimplifySRemInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::URem:
|
|
Result = SimplifyURemInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::FRem:
|
|
Result = SimplifyFRemInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Shl:
|
|
Result = SimplifyShlInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoSignedWrap(),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->hasNoUnsignedWrap(),
|
|
TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::LShr:
|
|
Result = SimplifyLShrInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->isExact(),
|
|
TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::AShr:
|
|
Result = SimplifyAShrInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
cast<BinaryOperator>(I)->isExact(),
|
|
TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::And:
|
|
Result = SimplifyAndInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Or:
|
|
Result = SimplifyOrInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Xor:
|
|
Result = SimplifyXorInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::ICmp:
|
|
Result = SimplifyICmpInst(cast<ICmpInst>(I)->getPredicate(),
|
|
I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::FCmp:
|
|
Result = SimplifyFCmpInst(cast<FCmpInst>(I)->getPredicate(),
|
|
I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::Select:
|
|
Result = SimplifySelectInst(I->getOperand(0), I->getOperand(1),
|
|
I->getOperand(2), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
case Instruction::GetElementPtr: {
|
|
SmallVector<Value*, 8> Ops(I->op_begin(), I->op_end());
|
|
Result = SimplifyGEPInst(Ops, TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
case Instruction::InsertValue: {
|
|
InsertValueInst *IV = cast<InsertValueInst>(I);
|
|
Result = SimplifyInsertValueInst(IV->getAggregateOperand(),
|
|
IV->getInsertedValueOperand(),
|
|
IV->getIndices(), TD, DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
case Instruction::PHI:
|
|
Result = SimplifyPHINode(cast<PHINode>(I), DT);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// If called on unreachable code, the above logic may report that the
|
|
/// instruction simplified to itself. Make life easier for users by
|
|
/// detecting that case here, returning a safe value instead.
|
|
return Result == I ? UndefValue::get(I->getType()) : Result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ReplaceAndSimplifyAllUses - Perform From->replaceAllUsesWith(To) and then
|
|
/// delete the From instruction. In addition to a basic RAUW, this does a
|
|
/// recursive simplification of the newly formed instructions. This catches
|
|
/// things where one simplification exposes other opportunities. This only
|
|
/// simplifies and deletes scalar operations, it does not change the CFG.
|
|
///
|
|
void llvm::ReplaceAndSimplifyAllUses(Instruction *From, Value *To,
|
|
const TargetData *TD,
|
|
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
|
assert(From != To && "ReplaceAndSimplifyAllUses(X,X) is not valid!");
|
|
|
|
// FromHandle/ToHandle - This keeps a WeakVH on the from/to values so that
|
|
// we can know if it gets deleted out from under us or replaced in a
|
|
// recursive simplification.
|
|
WeakVH FromHandle(From);
|
|
WeakVH ToHandle(To);
|
|
|
|
while (!From->use_empty()) {
|
|
// Update the instruction to use the new value.
|
|
Use &TheUse = From->use_begin().getUse();
|
|
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(TheUse.getUser());
|
|
TheUse = To;
|
|
|
|
// Check to see if the instruction can be folded due to the operand
|
|
// replacement. For example changing (or X, Y) into (or X, -1) can replace
|
|
// the 'or' with -1.
|
|
Value *SimplifiedVal;
|
|
{
|
|
// Sanity check to make sure 'User' doesn't dangle across
|
|
// SimplifyInstruction.
|
|
AssertingVH<> UserHandle(User);
|
|
|
|
SimplifiedVal = SimplifyInstruction(User, TD, DT);
|
|
if (SimplifiedVal == 0) continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Recursively simplify this user to the new value.
|
|
ReplaceAndSimplifyAllUses(User, SimplifiedVal, TD, DT);
|
|
From = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>((Value*)FromHandle);
|
|
To = ToHandle;
|
|
|
|
assert(ToHandle && "To value deleted by recursive simplification?");
|
|
|
|
// If the recursive simplification ended up revisiting and deleting
|
|
// 'From' then we're done.
|
|
if (From == 0)
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If 'From' has value handles referring to it, do a real RAUW to update them.
|
|
From->replaceAllUsesWith(To);
|
|
|
|
From->eraseFromParent();
|
|
}
|