mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-10-01 10:57:21 +00:00
8af8091ef5
Some benchmarks have shown that this could lead to a potential performance benefit, and so adding some flags to try to help measure the difference. A possible explanation. In diamond-shaped CFGs (A followed by either B or C both followed by D), putting B and C both in between A and D leads to the code being less dense than it could be. Always either B or C have to be skipped increasing the chance of cache misses etc. Moving either B or C to after D might be beneficial on average. In the long run, but we should probably do a better job of analyzing the basic block and branch probabilities to move the correct one of B or C to after D. But even if we don't use this in the long run, it is a good baseline for benchmarking. Original patch authored by Daniel Jasper with test tweaks and a second flag added by me. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6969 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Analysis | ||
AsmParser | ||
Bitcode | ||
CodeGen | ||
DebugInfo | ||
ExecutionEngine | ||
IR | ||
IRReader | ||
LineEditor | ||
Linker | ||
LTO | ||
MC | ||
Object | ||
Option | ||
ProfileData | ||
Support | ||
TableGen | ||
Target | ||
Transforms | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
LLVMBuild.txt | ||
Makefile |