mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-09-09 15:57:28 +00:00
ae4f3f6820
PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect and PPCInstrInfo::canInsertSelect were computing the
common subclass of the true and false inputs, and then selecting either the
32-bit or the 64-bit isel variant based on the result of calling
PPC::GPRCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC) and PPC::G8RCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)
(where RC is the common subclass). Unfortunately, this is not quite right: if
we have something like this:
%vreg8<def> = SELECT_CC_I8 %vreg4<kill>, %vreg7<kill>, %vreg6<kill>, 76;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg8 CRRC:%vreg4 G8RC_NOX0:%vreg7,%vreg6
then the common subclass of G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0 and G8RC_NOX0 is G8RC_NOX0, and
G8RC_NOX0 is not a subclass of G8RC (because it also contains the ZERO8
pseudo-register). As a result, we also need to check the common subclass
against GPRC_NOR0 and G8RC_NOX0 explicitly.
This had not been a problem for clients of insertSelect that called
canInsertSelect first (because it had a compensating mistake), but insertSelect
is also used by the PPC pseudo-instruction expander, and this error was causing
a problem in that context.
This problem was found by csmith.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Analysis | ||
| Assembler | ||
| Bindings/Ocaml | ||
| Bitcode | ||
| BugPoint | ||
| CodeGen | ||
| DebugInfo | ||
| ExecutionEngine | ||
| Feature | ||
| FileCheck | ||
| Instrumentation | ||
| Integer | ||
| JitListener | ||
| Linker | ||
| MC | ||
| Object | ||
| Other | ||
| TableGen | ||
| tools | ||
| Transforms | ||
| Unit | ||
| Verifier | ||
| YAMLParser | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| lit.cfg | ||
| lit.site.cfg.in | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.tests | ||
| TestRunner.sh | ||