llvm-6502/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-cmp.ll
Philip Reames 16e7e690b7 [JumpThreading] Simplify comparisons when simplifying branches
If we have recognized that a conditional is constant at a particular location in the code (while trying to decide if we can simplify a conditional branch), we can eagerly replace that condition with a constant if it's definition is post dominated by the branch in question.

In practice, this ends up being a compile time savings at most. JumpThreading would have visited each using branch anyways. CVP would have visited the cmp itself again. Unless LVI gives up early, we shouldn't gain any addition power by doing this transformation early. What we do gain is simplicity and compile time.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9312



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236684 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-05-07 00:19:14 +00:00

70 lines
1.7 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt -S -jump-threading %s | FileCheck %s
; When simplify a branch based on LVI predicates, we should replace the
; comparison itself with a constant (when possible) in case it's otherwise used.
define i32 @test(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test
; CHECK: icmp eq
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp, label %exit2, label %exit1
; CHECK-NOT: icmp ne
entry:
%cmp = icmp eq i32* %p, null
br i1 %cmp, label %is_null, label %not_null
is_null:
%cmp2 = icmp ne i32* %p, null
br i1 %cmp2, label %exit1, label %exit2
not_null:
%cmp3 = icmp ne i32* %p, null
br i1 %cmp3, label %exit1, label %exit2
exit1:
ret i32 0
exit2:
ret i32 1
}
declare void @use(i1)
; It would not be legal to replace %cmp2 (well, in this case it actually is,
; but that's a CSE problem, not a LVI/jump threading problem)
define i32 @test_negative(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test
; CHECK: icmp ne
; CHECK: icmp eq
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp, label %exit2, label %exit1
; CHECK-NOT: icmp ne
entry:
%cmp2 = icmp ne i32* %p, null
call void @use(i1 %cmp2)
%cmp = icmp eq i32* %p, null
br i1 %cmp, label %is_null, label %not_null
is_null:
br i1 %cmp2, label %exit1, label %exit2
not_null:
br i1 %cmp2, label %exit1, label %exit2
exit1:
ret i32 0
exit2:
ret i32 1
}
; In this case, we can remove cmp2 because it's otherwise unused
define i32 @test2(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test
; CHECK-LABEL: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT: icmp eq
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp, label %exit2, label %exit1
; CHECK-NOT: icmp ne
entry:
%cmp2 = icmp ne i32* %p, null
%cmp = icmp eq i32* %p, null
br i1 %cmp, label %is_null, label %not_null
is_null:
br i1 %cmp2, label %exit1, label %exit2
not_null:
br i1 %cmp2, label %exit1, label %exit2
exit1:
ret i32 0
exit2:
ret i32 1
}