llvm-6502/lib/Analysis
Bob Wilson 3b9a911efc Temporarily revert the TargetTransform changes.
The TargetTransform changes are breaking LTO bootstraps of clang.  I am
working with Nadav to figure out the problem, but I am reverting it for now
to get our buildbots working.

This reverts svn commits: 165665 165669 165670 165786 165787 165997
and I have also reverted clang svn 165741

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-18 05:43:52 +00:00
..
IPA
AliasAnalysis.cpp
AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp
AliasDebugger.cpp
AliasSetTracker.cpp
Analysis.cpp
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
CaptureTracking.cpp
CFGPrinter.cpp
CMakeLists.txt
CodeMetrics.cpp
ConstantFolding.cpp
DbgInfoPrinter.cpp
DependenceAnalysis.cpp
DominanceFrontier.cpp
DomPrinter.cpp
InlineCost.cpp
InstCount.cpp
InstructionSimplify.cpp
Interval.cpp
IntervalPartition.cpp
IVUsers.cpp
LazyValueInfo.cpp
LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp
LibCallSemantics.cpp
Lint.cpp
LLVMBuild.txt
Loads.cpp
LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp
LoopInfo.cpp
LoopPass.cpp
Makefile
MemDepPrinter.cpp
MemoryBuiltins.cpp
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp
NoAliasAnalysis.cpp
PathNumbering.cpp
PathProfileInfo.cpp
PathProfileVerifier.cpp
PHITransAddr.cpp
PostDominators.cpp
ProfileDataLoader.cpp
ProfileDataLoaderPass.cpp
ProfileEstimatorPass.cpp
ProfileInfo.cpp
ProfileInfoLoader.cpp
ProfileInfoLoaderPass.cpp
ProfileVerifierPass.cpp
README.txt
RegionInfo.cpp
RegionPass.cpp
RegionPrinter.cpp
ScalarEvolution.cpp
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp
ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp Temporarily revert the TargetTransform changes. 2012-10-18 05:43:52 +00:00
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp
SparsePropagation.cpp
Trace.cpp
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp
ValueTracking.cpp

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//