llvm-6502/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/profitability.ll
Karthik Bhat 52610d84ad Add a new pass "Loop Interchange"
This pass interchanges loops to provide a more cache-friendly memory access.

For e.g. given a loop like -
  for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
    for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
      A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];

is interchanged to -
  for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
    for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
      A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];

This pass is currently disabled by default.

To give a brief introduction it consists of 3 stages-

LoopInterchangeLegality : Checks the legality of loop interchange based on Dependency matrix.
LoopInterchangeProfitability: A very basic heuristic has been added to check for profitibility. This will evolve over time.
LoopInterchangeTransform : Which does the actual transform.

LNT Performance tests shows improvement in Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt and Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver becnmarks.

TODO:
1) Add support for reductions and lcssa phi.
2) Improve profitability model.
3) Improve loop selection algorithm to select best loop for interchange. Currently the innermost loop is selected for interchange.
4) Improve compile time regression found in llvm lnt due to this pass.
5) Fix issues in Dependency Analysis module.

A special thanks to Hal for reviewing this code.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7499




git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-03-06 10:11:25 +00:00

206 lines
8.7 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test profitability model in these test cases.
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
@A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@B = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
;;---------------------------------------Test case 01---------------------------------
;; Loops interchange will result in code vectorization and hence profitable. Check for interchange.
;; for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
;; for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
;; A[j][i] = A[j - 1][i] + B[j][i];
define void @interchange_01(i32 %N) {
entry:
%cmp27 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
br i1 %cmp27, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end16
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
br label %for.body3.preheader
for.body3.preheader:
%indvars.iv30 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next31, %for.inc14 ]
br label %for.body3
for.body3:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ], [ 1, %for.body3.preheader ]
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
%arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %1, i64 %indvars.iv30
%2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
%arrayidx9 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv30
%3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx9
%add = add nsw i32 %3, %2
%arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv30
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc14, label %for.body3
for.inc14:
%indvars.iv.next31 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv30, 1
%lftr.wideiv32 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv30 to i32
%exitcond33 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv32, %0
br i1 %exitcond33, label %for.end16, label %for.body3.preheader
for.end16:
ret void
}
;; Here we are checking partial .ll to check if loop are interchanged.
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_01
; CHECK: for.body3.preheader: ; preds = %for.inc14, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph
; CHECK: %indvars.iv30 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next31, %for.inc14 ]
; CHECK: br label %for.body3.split2
; CHECK: for.body3.preheader1: ; preds = %entry
; CHECK: br label %for.body3
; CHECK: for.body3: ; preds = %for.body3.preheader1, %for.body3.split
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3.split ], [ 1, %for.body3.preheader1 ]
; CHECK: br label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph
; CHECK: for.body3.split2: ; preds = %for.body3.preheader
; CHECK: %1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
; CHECK: %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %1, i64 %indvars.iv30
; CHECK: %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
; CHECK: %arrayidx9 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv30
; CHECK: %3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx9
; CHECK: %add = add nsw i32 %3, %2
; CHECK: %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv30
; CHECK: store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13
; CHECK: br label %for.inc14
;; ---------------------------------------Test case 02---------------------------------
;; Check loop interchange profitability model.
;; This tests profitability model when operands of getelementpointer and not exactly the induction variable but some
;; arithmetic operation on them.
;; for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
;; for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
;; A[j-1][i-1] = A[j - 1][i-1] + B[j-1][i-1];
define void @interchange_02(i32 %N) {
entry:
%cmp32 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
br i1 %cmp32, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end21
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
br label %for.body3.lr.ph
for.body3.lr.ph:
%indvars.iv35 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next36, %for.inc19 ]
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv35, -1
br label %for.body3
for.body3:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body3.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %2, i64 %1
%3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
%arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %2, i64 %1
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx12
%add = add nsw i32 %4, %3
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc19, label %for.body3
for.inc19:
%indvars.iv.next36 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv35, 1
%lftr.wideiv38 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv35 to i32
%exitcond39 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv38, %0
br i1 %exitcond39, label %for.end21, label %for.body3.lr.ph
for.end21:
ret void
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_02
; CHECK: for.body3.lr.ph: ; preds = %for.inc19, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph
; CHECK: %indvars.iv35 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next36, %for.inc19 ]
; CHECK: %0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv35, -1
; CHECK: br label %for.body3.split1
; CHECK: for.body3.preheader: ; preds = %entry
; CHECK: %1 = add i32 %N, -1
; CHECK: br label %for.body3
; CHECK: for.body3: ; preds = %for.body3.preheader, %for.body3.split
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3.split ], [ 1, %for.body3.preheader ]
; CHECK: br label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph
; CHECK: for.body3.split1: ; preds = %for.body3.lr.ph
; CHECK: %2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
; CHECK: %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %2, i64 %0
; CHECK: %3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
; CHECK: %arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %2, i64 %0
; CHECK: %4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx12
; CHECK: %add = add nsw i32 %4, %3
; CHECK: store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
; CHECK: br label %for.inc19
;;---------------------------------------Test case 03---------------------------------
;; Loops interchange is not profitable.
;; for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
;; for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
;; A[i-1][j-1] = A[i - 1][j-1] + B[i][j];
define void @interchange_03(i32 %N){
entry:
%cmp31 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
br i1 %cmp31, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end19
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
br label %for.body3.lr.ph
for.body3.lr.ph:
%indvars.iv34 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next35, %for.inc17 ]
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv34, -1
br label %for.body3
for.body3:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body3.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %1, i64 %2
%3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
%arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv34, i64 %indvars.iv
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx10
%add = add nsw i32 %4, %3
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc17, label %for.body3
for.inc17:
%indvars.iv.next35 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv34, 1
%lftr.wideiv37 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv34 to i32
%exitcond38 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv37, %0
br i1 %exitcond38, label %for.end19, label %for.body3.lr.ph
for.end19:
ret void
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_03
; CHECK: for.body3.lr.ph:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv34 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next35, %for.inc17 ]
; CHECK: %1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv34, -1
; CHECK: br label %for.body3.preheader
; CHECK: for.body3.preheader:
; CHECK: br label %for.body3
; CHECK: for.body3:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ], [ 1, %for.body3.preheader ]
; CHECK: %2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
; CHECK: %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %1, i64 %2
; CHECK: %3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
; CHECK: %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv34, i64 %indvars.iv
; CHECK: %4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx10