Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 9ca230f11c IR: Move NumOperands from User to Value, NFC ... Store `User::NumOperands` (and `MDNode::NumOperands`) in `Value`. On 64-bit host architectures, this reduces `sizeof(User)` and all subclasses by 8, and has no effect on `sizeof(Value)` (or, incidentally, on `sizeof(MDNode)`). On 32-bit host architectures, this increases `sizeof(Value)` by 4. However, it has no effect on `sizeof(User)` and `sizeof(MDNode)`, so the only concrete subclasses of `Value` that actually see the increase are `BasicBlock`, `Argument`, `InlineAsm`, and `MDString`. Moreover, I'll be shocked and confused if this causes a tangible memory regression. This has no functionality change (other than memory footprint). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2014-10-15 20:39:05 +00:00
..
llvm	IR: Move NumOperands from User to Value, NFC	2014-10-15 20:39:05 +00:00
llvm-c	Introduce LLVMWriteBitcodeToMemoryBuffer C API function.	2014-10-14 00:30:59 +00:00