mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-09-30 19:55:11 +00:00
6231d5be41
spotted by inspection, and I've crafted no test case that triggers it on my machine, but some of the windows builders are hitting what looks like memory corruption, so *something* is amiss here. This patch takes a more generalized approach to eliminating double-visits. Imagine code such as: %x = ... %y = add %x, 1 %z = add %x, %y You can imagine that if we simplify %x, we would add %y and %z to the list. If the use-chain order happens to cause us to add them in reverse order, we could pull %y off first, and simplify it, adding %z to the list. We now have %z on the list twice, and will reference it after it is deleted. Currently, all my test cases happen to not trigger this, likely due to the use-chain ordering, but there seems no guarantee that such a situation could not occur, so we should handle it correctly. Again, if anyone knows how to craft a testcase that actually triggers this, please let me know. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@153397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| IPA | ||
| AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
| AliasDebugger.cpp | ||
| AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
| Analysis.cpp | ||
| BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
| BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
| CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
| CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CodeMetrics.cpp | ||
| ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
| DbgInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
| DebugInfo.cpp | ||
| DIBuilder.cpp | ||
| DominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
| DomPrinter.cpp | ||
| InlineCost.cpp | ||
| InstCount.cpp | ||
| InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
| Interval.cpp | ||
| IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
| IVUsers.cpp | ||
| LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
| LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| LibCallSemantics.cpp | ||
| Lint.cpp | ||
| LLVMBuild.txt | ||
| Loads.cpp | ||
| LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| LoopInfo.cpp | ||
| LoopPass.cpp | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MemDepPrinter.cpp | ||
| MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
| MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
| NoAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| PathNumbering.cpp | ||
| PathProfileInfo.cpp | ||
| PathProfileVerifier.cpp | ||
| PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
| PostDominators.cpp | ||
| ProfileEstimatorPass.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfo.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfoLoader.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfoLoaderPass.cpp | ||
| ProfileVerifierPass.cpp | ||
| README.txt | ||
| RegionInfo.cpp | ||
| RegionPass.cpp | ||
| RegionPrinter.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
| SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
| Trace.cpp | ||
| TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ValueTracking.cpp | ||
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//