Dale Johannesen e6ec25543f Fix the time regression I introduced in 464.h264ref with ... my last patch to this file. The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad because register pressure later forced both base and IV into memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general; the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However, there were side effects.... It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is). I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite. It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers). In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither of which was handled before. And when inserting new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such code at the original location rather than in the PHI's immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside the loop (a case that couldn't happen before) (RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making multiple copies of it in this case. Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop. This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing into GEP's outside the loop. I owe some testcases for this, want to get it in for nightly runs. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@61362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2008-12-23 02:12:52 +00:00
..
Hello	Initial support for the CMake build system.	2008-09-22 01:08:49 +00:00
Instrumentation	Use Function::getEntryBlock() instead of Function::front(), for clarity.	2008-10-21 03:10:28 +00:00
IPO	insert some sequence points and preincrement an iterator to avoid	2008-12-17 05:42:08 +00:00
Scalar	Fix the time regression I introduced in 464.h264ref with	2008-12-23 02:12:52 +00:00
Utils	Fix PR2929 by making bugpoint/code extract propagate the nothrow	2008-12-18 05:52:56 +00:00
Makefile