llvm-6502/lib/Analysis/README.txt
Dan Gohman fafb890ee2 Fix LSR to tolerate cases where ScalarEvolution initially
misses an opportunity to fold add operands, but folds them
after LSR has separated them out. This fixes rdar://7886751.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-04-23 01:55:05 +00:00

31 lines
991 B
Plaintext

Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//