llvm-6502/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZTargetMachine.cpp
Reid Kleckner d12434058d Add out of line virtual destructors to all LLVMTargetMachine subclasses
These recently all grew a unique_ptr<TargetLoweringObjectFile> member in
r221878.  When anyone calls a virtual method of a class, clang-cl
requires all virtual methods to be semantically valid. This includes the
implicit virtual destructor, which triggers instantiation of the
unique_ptr destructor, which fails because the type being deleted is
incomplete.

This is just part of the ongoing saga of PR20337, which is affecting
Blink as well. Because the MSVC ABI doesn't have key functions, we end
up referencing the vtable and implicit destructor on any virtual call
through a class. We don't actually end up emitting the dtor, so it'd be
good if we could avoid this unneeded type completion work.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-20 23:37:18 +00:00

105 lines
4.0 KiB
C++

//===-- SystemZTargetMachine.cpp - Define TargetMachine for SystemZ -------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "SystemZTargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl.h"
using namespace llvm;
extern "C" void LLVMInitializeSystemZTarget() {
// Register the target.
RegisterTargetMachine<SystemZTargetMachine> X(TheSystemZTarget);
}
SystemZTargetMachine::SystemZTargetMachine(const Target &T, StringRef TT,
StringRef CPU, StringRef FS,
const TargetOptions &Options,
Reloc::Model RM, CodeModel::Model CM,
CodeGenOpt::Level OL)
: LLVMTargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL),
TLOF(make_unique<TargetLoweringObjectFileELF>()),
Subtarget(TT, CPU, FS, *this) {
initAsmInfo();
}
SystemZTargetMachine::~SystemZTargetMachine() {}
namespace {
/// SystemZ Code Generator Pass Configuration Options.
class SystemZPassConfig : public TargetPassConfig {
public:
SystemZPassConfig(SystemZTargetMachine *TM, PassManagerBase &PM)
: TargetPassConfig(TM, PM) {}
SystemZTargetMachine &getSystemZTargetMachine() const {
return getTM<SystemZTargetMachine>();
}
void addIRPasses() override;
bool addInstSelector() override;
bool addPreSched2() override;
bool addPreEmitPass() override;
};
} // end anonymous namespace
void SystemZPassConfig::addIRPasses() {
TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();
}
bool SystemZPassConfig::addInstSelector() {
addPass(createSystemZISelDag(getSystemZTargetMachine(), getOptLevel()));
return false;
}
bool SystemZPassConfig::addPreSched2() {
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None &&
getSystemZTargetMachine().getSubtargetImpl()->hasLoadStoreOnCond())
addPass(&IfConverterID);
return true;
}
bool SystemZPassConfig::addPreEmitPass() {
// We eliminate comparisons here rather than earlier because some
// transformations can change the set of available CC values and we
// generally want those transformations to have priority. This is
// especially true in the commonest case where the result of the comparison
// is used by a single in-range branch instruction, since we will then
// be able to fuse the compare and the branch instead.
//
// For example, two-address NILF can sometimes be converted into
// three-address RISBLG. NILF produces a CC value that indicates whether
// the low word is zero, but RISBLG does not modify CC at all. On the
// other hand, 64-bit ANDs like NILL can sometimes be converted to RISBG.
// The CC value produced by NILL isn't useful for our purposes, but the
// value produced by RISBG can be used for any comparison with zero
// (not just equality). So there are some transformations that lose
// CC values (while still being worthwhile) and others that happen to make
// the CC result more useful than it was originally.
//
// Another reason is that we only want to use BRANCH ON COUNT in cases
// where we know that the count register is not going to be spilled.
//
// Doing it so late makes it more likely that a register will be reused
// between the comparison and the branch, but it isn't clear whether
// preventing that would be a win or not.
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(createSystemZElimComparePass(getSystemZTargetMachine()));
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(createSystemZShortenInstPass(getSystemZTargetMachine()));
addPass(createSystemZLongBranchPass(getSystemZTargetMachine()));
return true;
}
TargetPassConfig *SystemZTargetMachine::createPassConfig(PassManagerBase &PM) {
return new SystemZPassConfig(this, PM);
}