mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-12-22 07:32:48 +00:00
12f0dc6bb5
This is done by pushing physical register definitions close to their use, which happens to handle flag definitions if they're not glued to the branch. This seems to be generally a good thing though, so I didn't need to add a target hook yet. The primary motivation is to generate code closer to what people expect and rule out missed opportunity from enabling macro-op fusion. As a side benefit, we get several 2-5% gains on x86 benchmarks. There is one regression: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists slows down be -10%. But this is an independent scheduler bug that will be tracked separately. See rdar://problem/9283108. Incidentally, pre-RA scheduling is only half the solution. Fixing the later passes is tracked by: <rdar://problem/8932804> [pre-RA-sched] on x86, attempt to schedule CMP/TEST adjacent with condition jump Fixes: <rdar://problem/9262453> Scheduler unnecessary break of cmp/jump fusion git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@129508 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
433 lines
12 KiB
LLVM
433 lines
12 KiB
LLVM
; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -asm-verbose=false -post-RA-scheduler=true | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
declare void @bar(i32)
|
|
declare void @car(i32)
|
|
declare void @dar(i32)
|
|
declare void @ear(i32)
|
|
declare void @far(i32)
|
|
declare i1 @qux()
|
|
|
|
@GHJK = global i32 0
|
|
@HABC = global i32 0
|
|
|
|
; BranchFolding should tail-merge the stores since they all precede
|
|
; direct branches to the same place.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: tail_merge_me:
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: GHJK
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, GHJK(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movl $1, HABC(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: GHJK
|
|
|
|
define void @tail_merge_me() nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%a = call i1 @qux()
|
|
br i1 %a, label %A, label %next
|
|
next:
|
|
%b = call i1 @qux()
|
|
br i1 %b, label %B, label %C
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
call void @bar(i32 0)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
B:
|
|
call void @car(i32 1)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
C:
|
|
call void @dar(i32 2)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
M:
|
|
store i32 1, i32* @HABC
|
|
%c = call i1 @qux()
|
|
br i1 %c, label %return, label %altret
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
call void @ear(i32 1000)
|
|
ret void
|
|
altret:
|
|
call void @far(i32 1001)
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
declare i8* @choose(i8*, i8*)
|
|
|
|
; BranchFolding should tail-duplicate the indirect jump to avoid
|
|
; redundant branching.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: tail_duplicate_me:
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, GHJK(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: jmpq *%r
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, GHJK(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: jmpq *%r
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, GHJK(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: jmpq *%r
|
|
|
|
define void @tail_duplicate_me() nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%a = call i1 @qux()
|
|
%c = call i8* @choose(i8* blockaddress(@tail_duplicate_me, %return),
|
|
i8* blockaddress(@tail_duplicate_me, %altret))
|
|
br i1 %a, label %A, label %next
|
|
next:
|
|
%b = call i1 @qux()
|
|
br i1 %b, label %B, label %C
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
call void @bar(i32 0)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
B:
|
|
call void @car(i32 1)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
C:
|
|
call void @dar(i32 2)
|
|
store i32 0, i32* @GHJK
|
|
br label %M
|
|
|
|
M:
|
|
indirectbr i8* %c, [label %return, label %altret]
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
call void @ear(i32 1000)
|
|
ret void
|
|
altret:
|
|
call void @far(i32 1001)
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; BranchFolding shouldn't try to merge the tails of two blocks
|
|
; with only a branch in common, regardless of the fallthrough situation.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: dont_merge_oddly:
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: ret
|
|
; CHECK: ucomiss %xmm{{[0-2]}}, %xmm{{[0-2]}}
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: jbe .LBB2_3
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ucomiss %xmm{{[0-2]}}, %xmm{{[0-2]}}
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ja .LBB2_4
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB2_2:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movb $1, %al
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB2_3:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ucomiss %xmm{{[0-2]}}, %xmm{{[0-2]}}
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: jbe .LBB2_2
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB2_4:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: xorb %al, %al
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
|
|
|
|
define i1 @dont_merge_oddly(float* %result) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%tmp4 = getelementptr float* %result, i32 2
|
|
%tmp5 = load float* %tmp4, align 4
|
|
%tmp7 = getelementptr float* %result, i32 4
|
|
%tmp8 = load float* %tmp7, align 4
|
|
%tmp10 = getelementptr float* %result, i32 6
|
|
%tmp11 = load float* %tmp10, align 4
|
|
%tmp12 = fcmp olt float %tmp8, %tmp11
|
|
br i1 %tmp12, label %bb, label %bb21
|
|
|
|
bb:
|
|
%tmp23469 = fcmp olt float %tmp5, %tmp8
|
|
br i1 %tmp23469, label %bb26, label %bb30
|
|
|
|
bb21:
|
|
%tmp23 = fcmp olt float %tmp5, %tmp11
|
|
br i1 %tmp23, label %bb26, label %bb30
|
|
|
|
bb26:
|
|
ret i1 0
|
|
|
|
bb30:
|
|
ret i1 1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; Do any-size tail-merging when two candidate blocks will both require
|
|
; an unconditional jump to complete a two-way conditional branch.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: c_expand_expr_stmt:
|
|
;
|
|
; This test only works when register allocation happens to use %rax for both
|
|
; load addresses.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHE: jmp .LBB3_11
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: .LBB3_9:
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: movq 8(%rax), %rax
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: xorb %dl, %dl
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: movb 16(%rax), %al
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: cmpb $16, %al
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: je .LBB3_11
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: cmpb $23, %al
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: jne .LBB3_14
|
|
; CHE-NEXT: .LBB3_11:
|
|
|
|
%0 = type { %struct.rtx_def* }
|
|
%struct.lang_decl = type opaque
|
|
%struct.rtx_def = type { i16, i8, i8, [1 x %union.rtunion] }
|
|
%struct.tree_decl = type { [24 x i8], i8*, i32, %union.tree_node*, i32, i8, i8, i8, i8, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %union.tree_node*, %struct.rtx_def*, %union..2anon, %0, %union.tree_node*, %struct.lang_decl* }
|
|
%union..2anon = type { i32 }
|
|
%union.rtunion = type { i8* }
|
|
%union.tree_node = type { %struct.tree_decl }
|
|
|
|
define fastcc void @c_expand_expr_stmt(%union.tree_node* %expr) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%tmp4 = load i8* null, align 8 ; <i8> [#uses=3]
|
|
switch i8 %tmp4, label %bb3 [
|
|
i8 18, label %bb
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb: ; preds = %entry
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb1 [
|
|
i32 0, label %bb2.i
|
|
i32 37, label %bb.i
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb.i: ; preds = %bb
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb1 [
|
|
i32 0, label %lvalue_p.exit
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb2.i: ; preds = %bb
|
|
br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
lvalue_p.exit: ; preds = %bb.i
|
|
%tmp21 = load %union.tree_node** null, align 8 ; <%union.tree_node*> [#uses=3]
|
|
%tmp22 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp21, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 0 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp23 = load i8* %tmp22, align 8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp24 = zext i8 %tmp23 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
|
|
switch i32 %tmp24, label %lvalue_p.exit4 [
|
|
i32 0, label %bb2.i3
|
|
i32 2, label %bb.i1
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb.i1: ; preds = %lvalue_p.exit
|
|
%tmp25 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp21, i64 0, i32 0, i32 2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp26 = bitcast i32* %tmp25 to %union.tree_node** ; <%union.tree_node**> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp27 = load %union.tree_node** %tmp26, align 8 ; <%union.tree_node*> [#uses=2]
|
|
%tmp28 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp27, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 16 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp29 = load i8* %tmp28, align 8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp30 = zext i8 %tmp29 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
|
|
switch i32 %tmp30, label %lvalue_p.exit4 [
|
|
i32 0, label %bb2.i.i2
|
|
i32 2, label %bb.i.i
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb.i.i: ; preds = %bb.i1
|
|
%tmp34 = tail call fastcc i32 @lvalue_p(%union.tree_node* null) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=1]
|
|
%phitmp = icmp ne i32 %tmp34, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
br label %lvalue_p.exit4
|
|
|
|
bb2.i.i2: ; preds = %bb.i1
|
|
%tmp35 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp27, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 8 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp36 = bitcast i8* %tmp35 to %union.tree_node** ; <%union.tree_node**> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp37 = load %union.tree_node** %tmp36, align 8 ; <%union.tree_node*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp38 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp37, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 16 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp39 = load i8* %tmp38, align 8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
|
|
switch i8 %tmp39, label %bb2 [
|
|
i8 16, label %lvalue_p.exit4
|
|
i8 23, label %lvalue_p.exit4
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb2.i3: ; preds = %lvalue_p.exit
|
|
%tmp40 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp21, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 8 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp41 = bitcast i8* %tmp40 to %union.tree_node** ; <%union.tree_node**> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp42 = load %union.tree_node** %tmp41, align 8 ; <%union.tree_node*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp43 = getelementptr inbounds %union.tree_node* %tmp42, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i64 16 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp44 = load i8* %tmp43, align 8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
|
|
switch i8 %tmp44, label %bb2 [
|
|
i8 16, label %lvalue_p.exit4
|
|
i8 23, label %lvalue_p.exit4
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
lvalue_p.exit4: ; preds = %bb2.i3, %bb2.i3, %bb2.i.i2, %bb2.i.i2, %bb.i.i, %bb.i1, %lvalue_p.exit
|
|
%tmp45 = phi i1 [ %phitmp, %bb.i.i ], [ false, %bb2.i.i2 ], [ false, %bb2.i.i2 ], [ false, %bb.i1 ], [ false, %bb2.i3 ], [ false, %bb2.i3 ], [ false, %lvalue_p.exit ] ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
%tmp46 = icmp eq i8 %tmp4, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
%or.cond = or i1 %tmp45, %tmp46 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
br i1 %or.cond, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb1: ; preds = %bb2.i.i, %bb.i, %bb
|
|
%.old = icmp eq i8 %tmp4, 23 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
br i1 %.old, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb2: ; preds = %bb1, %lvalue_p.exit4, %bb2.i3, %bb2.i.i2
|
|
br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb3: ; preds = %bb2, %bb1, %lvalue_p.exit4, %bb2.i, %entry
|
|
%expr_addr.0 = phi %union.tree_node* [ null, %bb2 ], [ %expr, %bb2.i ], [ %expr, %entry ], [ %expr, %bb1 ], [ %expr, %lvalue_p.exit4 ] ; <%union.tree_node*> [#uses=0]
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
declare fastcc i32 @lvalue_p(%union.tree_node* nocapture) nounwind readonly
|
|
|
|
declare fastcc %union.tree_node* @default_conversion(%union.tree_node*) nounwind
|
|
|
|
|
|
; If one tail merging candidate falls through into the other,
|
|
; tail merging is likely profitable regardless of how few
|
|
; instructions are involved. This function should have only
|
|
; one ret instruction.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: foo:
|
|
; CHECK: callq func
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB4_2:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: popq
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
|
|
|
|
define void @foo(i1* %V) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%t0 = icmp eq i1* %V, null
|
|
br i1 %t0, label %return, label %bb
|
|
|
|
bb:
|
|
call void @func()
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
declare void @func()
|
|
|
|
; one - One instruction may be tail-duplicated even with optsize.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: one:
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
|
|
@XYZ = external global i32
|
|
|
|
define void @one() nounwind optsize {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%0 = icmp eq i32 undef, 0
|
|
br i1 %0, label %bbx, label %bby
|
|
|
|
bby:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb7 [
|
|
i32 16, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb7:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
bbx:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb12 [
|
|
i32 128, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb12:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; two - Same as one, but with two instructions in the common
|
|
; tail instead of one. This is too much to be merged, given
|
|
; the optsize attribute.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: two:
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: XYZ
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK: movl $1, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: XYZ
|
|
; CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
define void @two() nounwind optsize {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%0 = icmp eq i32 undef, 0
|
|
br i1 %0, label %bbx, label %bby
|
|
|
|
bby:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb7 [
|
|
i32 16, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb7:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
volatile store i32 1, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
bbx:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb12 [
|
|
i32 128, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb12:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
volatile store i32 1, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; two_nosize - Same as two, but without the optsize attribute.
|
|
; Now two instructions are enough to be tail-duplicated.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: two_nosize:
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK: movl $1, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK: movl $0, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
; CHECK: movl $1, XYZ(%rip)
|
|
|
|
define void @two_nosize() nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%0 = icmp eq i32 undef, 0
|
|
br i1 %0, label %bbx, label %bby
|
|
|
|
bby:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb7 [
|
|
i32 16, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb7:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
volatile store i32 1, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
bbx:
|
|
switch i32 undef, label %bb12 [
|
|
i32 128, label %return
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
bb12:
|
|
volatile store i32 0, i32* @XYZ
|
|
volatile store i32 1, i32* @XYZ
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; Tail-merging should merge the two ret instructions since one side
|
|
; can fall-through into the ret and the other side has to branch anyway.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: TESTE:
|
|
; CHECK: imulq
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: LBB8_2:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
|
|
|
|
define i64 @TESTE(i64 %parami, i64 %paraml) nounwind readnone {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %parami, 1 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
%varx.0 = select i1 %cmp, i64 1, i64 %parami ; <i64> [#uses=1]
|
|
%cmp410 = icmp slt i64 %paraml, 1 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
br i1 %cmp410, label %for.end, label %bb.nph
|
|
|
|
bb.nph: ; preds = %entry
|
|
%tmp15 = mul i64 %paraml, %parami ; <i64> [#uses=1]
|
|
ret i64 %tmp15
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %entry
|
|
ret i64 %varx.0
|
|
}
|