From bfaa3790d099176b4efa231db84d35c19c3519a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Marty Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:19:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update corpus compression stats for v0.2.0 --- README.md | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 172276d..17a2647 100755 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ Compression ratio comparison between LZSA and other optimal packers, for a workl Performance over well-known compression corpus files: Uncompressed LZ4_HC -19 -B4 -BD LZSA - Canterbury 2810784 935827 (33,29%) 855329 (30,43%) - Silesia 211938580 77299725 (36,47%) 73794820 (34,82%) - Calgary 3251493 1248780 (38,40%) 1196872 (36,80%) - Large 11159482 3771025 (33,79%) 3649821 (32,70%) - enwik9 1000000000 371841591 (37,18%) 355429941 (35,54%) + Canterbury 2810784 935827 (33,29%) 855284 (30,43%) + Silesia 211938580 77299725 (36,47%) 73793860 (34,82%) + Calgary 3251493 1248780 (38,40%) 1196809 (36,80%) + Large 11159482 3771025 (33,79%) 3648987 (32,70%) + enwik9 1000000000 371841591 (37,18%) 355427361 (35,54%) As an example of LZSA's simplicity, a size-optimized decompressor on 8088 has been implemented in 91 bytes.