From 7106a8e29fa3f45ca7cc281579ec272cad627244 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tilleul Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 21:40:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Create 01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md --- .../01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md | 108 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 applesoft/nfs/calculations/01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md diff --git a/applesoft/nfs/calculations/01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md b/applesoft/nfs/calculations/01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..33acc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/applesoft/nfs/calculations/01_use_addition_instead_of_mul2.md @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +# Use addition instead of multiplication by 2 +Where fundamentals in mathematics might be useful for speed. +## Summary +* [Multiplication is just another form of addition](#multiplication-is-just-another-form-of-addition) +* [Restrictions](#restrictions) + + +## 🍎 Multiplication is just another form of addition. + +And when you're multiplying by 2, it's faster to use the addition counterpart. + +This is **always** true if what you want to do is ``A=2*B`` and that you use variables and replace hardcoded constants with variables (see section [Use variables as placeholders for constant values](#1-use-variables-as-placeholders-for-constant-values)). If you don't, you might get mitigated results. + +Demonstration: + +```basic +10 A=123: B=2 +20 C = A*B +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 3236 cycles. + +Snippet #2: + +```basic +10 A=123: B=2 +20 C = A+A +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes now 2321 cycles, a bonus of 915 cycles. + +Of course it would be even more drastic if you didn't store (and use !) the constant ``2`` in variable ``B`` + +```basic +10 A=123: B=2 +20 C = A*2 +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 3599 cycles, that's 1278 cycles more than using an addition ! + +Unfortunately, this tip does not work for anything else than multiplication by 2. Let's see what happens with multiplication by 3: + +```basic +10 A=123: B=3 +20 C = A*B +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 3236 cycles (again) +While line 20 of snippet #2: + +```basic +10 A=123: B=2 +20 C = A+A+A +30 END +``` + +takes 3287 cycles, that is 51 cycles slower. Of course it gets worse with higher multiplication values. + +## 🍎 Restrictions + +It's also important to notice that this will work only if you already have a variable with the value you want to double. + +Let's consider the following, you want to double the result of another calculation, like a division with code like ``D=2*A/B`` + +Snippet #1 + +```basic +10 A=123: B=45: C=2: D=0: E=0 +20 E=C*A/B +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 6795 cycles. Notice how line 10 declares five variables ``A-E``. These variables will be used in the subsequent snippets. Declaring them, even though they're not used, allows us to ignore the extra cycles needed to create a new variable. + +Now let's try with the addition: + +```basic +10 A=123: B=45: C=2: D=0: E=0 +20 D=A/B+A/B +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 9072 cycles, which is slower (2277 cycles slower). +Now you might think that storing the result of ``A/B`` would be faster. It's not. Except, maybe if you intend to use that result elsewhere in your code in which case it might be worth to spend those cycles storing a result in a variable. + +First snippet demonstrates the speed if you don't care about the result of ``A/B`` + +```basic +10 A=123: B=45: C=2: D=0: E=0 +20 D=A/B: E=D+D +30 END +``` + +Line 20 takes 7090 cycles, it's 295 cycles slower than using directly ``E=C*A/B``. + +This second snippet illustrates the speed if the result of ``A/B`` is of any interest and is meant to be reused several other times: it's thus calculated on line 10 and excluded from cycles count. + +```basic +10 A=123: B=45: C=2: D=A/B: E=0 +20 E=D+D +30 END +``` + +line 20 takes only 2409 cycles. Using ``20 E=C*D`` would take 2283 cycles more.