2015-08-11 12:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2014, Oliver Schmidt
|
|
|
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
* Neither the name of the <organization> nor the
|
|
|
|
names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
|
|
|
|
derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND
|
|
|
|
ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
|
|
|
|
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
|
|
|
|
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL OLIVER SCHMIDT BE LIABLE FOR ANY
|
|
|
|
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
|
|
|
|
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
|
|
|
|
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
|
|
|
|
ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
|
|
|
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
|
|
|
|
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
******************************************************************************/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some notes by Oliver Schmidt on the WIZnet W5100 Ethernet controller:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Operation Modes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 MAC-Raw
|
|
|
|
In MAC-Raw mode the W5100 behaves pretty much like a CS8900A or a LAN91C96. The
|
|
|
|
W5100 is usually only configured with a MAC address which is used by the W5100
|
|
|
|
to limit incoming frames to those sent to its MAC address (or broadcasts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 IP-Raw
|
|
|
|
IP-Raw mode is usable to implement non-UDP/non-TCP IP protocols like ICMP. The
|
|
|
|
W5100 is usually configured with a full IP profile (IP addr, netmask, gateway).
|
|
|
|
It transparently takes care of incoming/outgoing ARP and optionally of incoming
|
|
|
|
ICMP Echo (aka Ping).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 UDP
|
|
|
|
UDP mode is pretty simlar to IP-Raw mode but additionally takes care of header
|
|
|
|
checksum calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 TCP
|
|
|
|
TCP mode is rather different from the other modes. Incoming/outgoing data isn't
|
|
|
|
delimited by headers like in all other modes. Rather the W5100 behaves like a
|
|
|
|
BSD socket delivering/taking a data stream - in chunks not necessarily related
|
|
|
|
to data packets received/sent. The W5100 transparently takes care of TCP flow
|
|
|
|
control by sending ACK packets. It advertises a receive window identical to the
|
|
|
|
free space in the its receive memory buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The W5100 offers up to 4 'sockets' allowing to specify the operation mode for
|
|
|
|
each socket individually. However MAC-Raw mode is only available for the first
|
|
|
|
socket. It is possible to combine MAC-Raw mode with other modes for the other
|
2015-08-11 13:19:59 +00:00
|
|
|
sockets - which is called 'hybrid TCP/IP stack'. I have no personal experience
|
2015-08-11 12:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
with this hybrid TCP/IP stack and see open questions:
|
|
|
|
- Are packets delivered to other sockets filtered from the first socket?
|
|
|
|
- Who takes care of incoming ARP and incoming ICMP Echo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The W5100 divides its 16kB memory buffer statically into 8kB for receive and
|
|
|
|
8kB for send (in contrast to the CS8900A and the LAN91C96 which both do dynamic
|
|
|
|
receive/send buffer division). When using several sockets it is additionally
|
|
|
|
necessary to statically assign the two 8kB memory buffers to the sockets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Memory Buffer Access
|
|
|
|
In 6502 machines the W5100 is accessed using its indirect bus interface. This
|
|
|
|
interface optionally allows for pointer auto-increment (like the CS8900A and
|
|
|
|
the LAN91C96). However in contrast to those two Ethernet controllers the W5100
|
|
|
|
does NOT virtualize access to its memory buffer! So when reading/writing data
|
|
|
|
from/to the W5100 and reaching the end of the memory buffer assigned to the
|
|
|
|
socket it's the responsibility of the 6502 program to continue reading/writing
|
|
|
|
at the begin of the memory buffer. Please note that the pointer auto-increment
|
|
|
|
does NOT take care of that wraparound operation! I have implemented several
|
|
|
|
ways to handle this difficulty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Copy Split
|
|
|
|
If it is necessary or desired to have the interface to the upper layers being
|
|
|
|
based on a receive/send buffer and one can afford the memory for a little more
|
|
|
|
code than it is appropriate to check in advance if receive/send will require a
|
|
|
|
wraparound and in that case split the copy from/to the buffer into two copy
|
|
|
|
operations. That approach is used in all WIZnet code and I implemented it in
|
|
|
|
pretty optimized 6502 code for the Contiki/IP65 MAC-Raw mode driver located in
|
|
|
|
drivers/w5100.s - however the copy split technique is in general applicable to
|
|
|
|
all W5100 operation modes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Shadow Register
|
|
|
|
When it comes to using as little memory as possible I consider it in general
|
|
|
|
questionable if a buffer is the right interface paradigm. In many scenarios it
|
|
|
|
makes more sense to read/write bytes individually. This allows i.e. to directly
|
|
|
|
write bytes from individual already existing data structures to the W5100 or
|
|
|
|
analyze bytes directly on reading from the W5100 to decide on processing of
|
|
|
|
subsequent bytes - and maybe ignore them altogether. This approach splits a
|
|
|
|
receive/send operation into three phases: The initialization, the individual
|
|
|
|
byte read/write and the finalization. The initialization sets up a 16-bit
|
|
|
|
shadow register to be as far away from overflow as the auto-increment pointer
|
|
|
|
is away from the necessary wraparound. The individual byte read/write then
|
|
|
|
increments the shadow register and on its overflow resets the auto-increment
|
|
|
|
pointer to the begin of the memory buffer. I implemented this approach in two
|
|
|
|
drivers using heavily size-optimized 6502 code for the W5100 UDP mode and TCP
|
|
|
|
mode showing that the shadow register technique yields the smallest code. They
|
|
|
|
are located in supplement/w5100_udp.s and supplement/w5100_tcp.s with C test
|
|
|
|
programs located in test/w5100_udp_main.c and test/w5100_tcp_main.c. There's a
|
|
|
|
Win32 communication peer for the test programs located in test/w5100_peer.c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 TCP Stream Split
|
|
|
|
A correct BSD TCP socket program never presumes to be able to read/write any
|
|
|
|
amount of data. Rather it is always prepared to call recv()/send() as often as
|
2015-08-11 13:19:59 +00:00
|
|
|
necessary receive/send the expected amount data in whatever chunks - and the
|
2015-08-11 12:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
very same holds true for any program using the W5100 TCP mode! But this already
|
|
|
|
necessary complexity in the upper layers allows to handle W5100 memory buffer
|
|
|
|
wraparounds transparently by artificially limiting the size of a read/write
|
|
|
|
operation to the end of the memory buffer if necessary. The next read/write
|
|
|
|
operation then works with the begin of the memory buffer. This approach shares
|
|
|
|
the benefits of the shadow register technique while avoiding its performance
|
|
|
|
penalties coming from maintaining the shadow register. Additionally it allows
|
|
|
|
the upper layers to directly access the auto-increment W5100 data register for
|
|
|
|
individual byte read/write because it is known to stay within the memory buffer
|
|
|
|
limits. Therefore the TCP stream split technique avoids both the overhead of a
|
|
|
|
buffer as well as the overhead of function calls for individual bytes. It sort
|
|
|
|
of combines the best of both sides but it means larger code than the shadow
|
|
|
|
register technique and is only applicable to the W5100 TCP mode. I implemented
|
|
|
|
the TCP stream split technique in a C-only driver located in supplement/w5100.c
|
|
|
|
with a test program representing the upper layers located in test/w5100_main.c
|
|
|
|
being compatible with test/w5100_peer.c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
******************************************************************************/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef _W5100_H_
|
|
|
|
#define _W5100_H_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef unsigned char byte;
|
|
|
|
typedef unsigned short word;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
word w5100_data_request(byte do_send);
|
|
|
|
void w5100_data_commit(byte do_send, word size);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After w5100_receive_request() every read operation returns the next byte
|
|
|
|
// from the server.
|
|
|
|
// After w5100_send_request() every write operation prepares the next byte
|
|
|
|
// to be sent to the server.
|
|
|
|
extern volatile byte* w5100_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Initialize W5100 Ethernet controller with indirect bus interface located
|
|
|
|
// at <base_addr>. Use <ip_addr>, <submask> and <gateway> to configure the
|
|
|
|
// TCP/IP stack.
|
|
|
|
// Return <1> if a W5100 was found at <base_addr>, return <0> otherwise.
|
|
|
|
byte w5100_init(word base_addr, byte *ip_addr,
|
|
|
|
byte *submask,
|
|
|
|
byte *gateway);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Connect to server with IP address <server_addr> on TCP port <server_port>.
|
|
|
|
// Use <6502> as fixed local port.
|
|
|
|
// Return <1> if the connection is established, return <0> otherwise.
|
|
|
|
byte w5100_connect(byte *server_addr, word server_port);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if still connected to server.
|
|
|
|
// Return <1> if the connection is established, return <0> otherwise.
|
|
|
|
byte w5100_connected(void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Disconnect from server.
|
|
|
|
void w5100_disconnect(void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Request to receive data from the server.
|
|
|
|
// Return maximum number of bytes to be received by reading from *w5100_data.
|
|
|
|
#define w5100_receive_request() w5100_data_request(0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Commit receiving of <size> bytes from server. <size> may be smaller than
|
|
|
|
// the return value of w5100_receive_request(). Not commiting at all just
|
|
|
|
// makes the next request receive the same data again.
|
|
|
|
#define w5100_receive_commit(size) w5100_data_commit(0, (size))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Request to send data to the server.
|
|
|
|
// Return maximum number of bytes to be send by writing to *w5100_data.
|
|
|
|
#define w5100_send_request() w5100_data_request(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Commit sending of <size> bytes to server. <size> is usually smaller than
|
|
|
|
// the return value of w5100_send_request(). Not commiting at all just turns
|
|
|
|
// the w5100_send_request() and - the writes to *w5100_data - into NOPs.
|
|
|
|
#define w5100_send_commit(size) w5100_data_commit(1, (size))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|