mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2024-11-26 11:49:22 +00:00
remove unneeded sibling methods
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe17566370
commit
1b576f826d
@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ $repeatLabel lda $counterVar
|
||||
}
|
||||
inits.add(stmt)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
val next = (stmt.parent as IStatementContainer).nextSibling(stmt)
|
||||
val next = stmt.nextSibling()
|
||||
if (next !is ForLoop || next.loopVar.nameInSource.single() != stmt.name) {
|
||||
assignInitialValueToVar(stmt, listOf(stmt.name))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class UnusedCodeRemover(private val program: Program,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private fun reportUnreachable(stmt: Statement, parent: IStatementContainer) {
|
||||
when(val next = parent.nextSibling(stmt)) {
|
||||
when(val next = stmt.nextSibling()) {
|
||||
null, is Label, is Directive, is VarDecl, is InlineAssembly, is Subroutine -> {}
|
||||
else -> errors.warn("unreachable code", next.position)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -56,22 +56,6 @@ interface IStatementContainer {
|
||||
return result
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun nextSibling(stmt: Statement): Statement? {
|
||||
val nextIdx = statements.indexOfFirst { it===stmt } + 1
|
||||
return if(nextIdx < statements.size)
|
||||
statements[nextIdx]
|
||||
else
|
||||
null
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun previousSibling(stmt: Statement): Statement? {
|
||||
val previousIdx = statements.indexOfFirst { it===stmt } - 1
|
||||
return if(previousIdx>=0)
|
||||
statements[previousIdx]
|
||||
else
|
||||
null
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun indexOfChild(stmt: Statement): Int {
|
||||
val idx = statements.indexOfFirst { it===stmt }
|
||||
if(idx>=0)
|
||||
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ TODO
|
||||
For next compiler release (7.2)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
- fix the asm-labels problem (github issue #62)
|
||||
- fix that "uword qq =$1000+xx" uses stack eval, while "uword qq; qq=$1000+xx" uses optimized code
|
||||
- find a way to optimize asm-subroutine param passing where it now sometimes uses the evalstack?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,23 +1,26 @@
|
||||
%import textio
|
||||
%zeropage basicsafe
|
||||
%zeropage dontuse
|
||||
|
||||
main {
|
||||
|
||||
sub start() {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ubyte xx = 100
|
||||
ubyte cv
|
||||
uword qq =$1234+xx ; TODO FIX THAT THIS USES STACK
|
||||
|
||||
sys.memset($1000+xx, 10, 255) ; TODO uses stack eval now to precalc parameters
|
||||
uword ww
|
||||
ww=$1234+xx
|
||||
|
||||
xx = xx & %0001 ; doesn't use stack... because it uses AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen
|
||||
;yy = xx & %0001 ; doesn't use stack... because it uses AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen
|
||||
|
||||
;ubyte yy = xx & %0001 ; TODO uses stack eval....
|
||||
if xx & %0001 { ; TODO why does this use stack? because it uses asmgen.assignExpressionToRegister eventually line 253 in AssignmentAsmGen no augmentable-assignment.
|
||||
xx--
|
||||
}
|
||||
; ubyte cv
|
||||
; sys.memset($1000+xx, 10, 255) ; TODO uses stack eval now to precalc parameters
|
||||
;
|
||||
; xx = xx & %0001 ; doesn't use stack... because it uses AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen
|
||||
; ;yy = xx & %0001 ; doesn't use stack... because it uses AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen
|
||||
;
|
||||
; ;ubyte yy = xx & %0001 ; TODO uses stack eval....
|
||||
; if xx & %0001 { ; TODO why does this use stack? because it uses asmgen.assignExpressionToRegister eventually line 253 in AssignmentAsmGen no augmentable-assignment.
|
||||
; xx--
|
||||
; }
|
||||
|
||||
; if xx+1 { ; TODO why does this use stack? see above
|
||||
; xx++
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user