mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2025-02-18 05:30:34 +00:00
69 lines
2.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
69 lines
2.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
====
|
|
TODO
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
- implement the asm for bitshift on arrays (last missing assembly code generation)
|
|
- aliases for imported symbols for example perhaps '%alias print = c64scr.print'
|
|
- option to load library files from a directory instead of the embedded ones (easier library development/debugging)
|
|
|
|
- investigate support for 8bitguy's Commander X16 platform https://murray2.com/forums/commander-x16.9/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memory Block Operations integrated in language?
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
array/string memory block operations?
|
|
|
|
- array operations
|
|
copy (from another array with the same length), shift-N(left,right), rotate-N(left,right)
|
|
clear (set whole array to the given value, default 0)
|
|
|
|
- array operations ofcourse work identical on vars and on memory mapped vars of these types.
|
|
|
|
- strings: identical operations as on array.
|
|
|
|
For now, we have the ``memcopy`` and ``memset`` builtin functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
More optimizations
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Add more compiler optimizations to the existing ones.
|
|
|
|
- remove unreachable code after an exit(), return or goto
|
|
- working subroutine inlining (start with trivial routines, grow to taking care of vars and identifier refs to them)
|
|
- add a compiler option to not include variable initialization code (useful if the program is expected to run only once, such as a game)
|
|
the program will then rely solely on the values as they are in memory at the time of program startup.
|
|
- Also some library routines and code patterns could perhaps be optimized further
|
|
- can the parameter passing to subroutines be optimized to avoid copying?
|
|
- subroutine calling convention? like: 1 byte arg -> pass in A, 2 bytes -> pass in A+Y, return value likewise.
|
|
- more optimizations on the language AST level
|
|
- more optimizations on the final assembly source level
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eval stack redesign? (lot of work)
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
The eval stack is now a split lsb/msb stack using X as the stackpointer.
|
|
Is it easier/faster to just use a single page unsplit stack?
|
|
It could then even be moved into the zeropage to greatly reduce code size and slowness.
|
|
|
|
Or just move the LSB portion into a slab of the zeropage.
|
|
|
|
Allocate a fixed word in ZP that is the Top Of Stack value so we can always operate on TOS directly
|
|
without having to index with X into the eval stack all the time?
|
|
This could GREATLY improvde code size and speed for operatios that work on just a single value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bug Fixing
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
Ofcourse there are always bugs to fix ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misc
|
|
^^^^
|
|
|
|
Several ideas were discussed on my reddit post
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/alhj59/creating_a_programming_language_and_cross/
|
|
|