From ae1a101db29635e28e52bdfdc3783539f6de90c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Greene Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:39:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update of TODO indicating some file management issues as being fixed as well as additional ideas. --- TODO | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index cc82720..3f3e077 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -11,9 +11,19 @@ This is the internal list of items that need to be done. introduced. * Extract AppleWorks Data Base files. * Extract AppleWorks Spread Sheet files. +* Fixed minor issue with ProDOS disks where files at the 128K border would + be grown (incorrectly) into a Tree file (instead of a Sapling). +* Import of multiple files fails after multiple imports. This was an issue + with ProDOS files >128K ("Tree" files). The delete code didn't handle the + master index block appropriately when blocks numbered zero were present + (normally indicating the end of file). --- FUTURE --- -o Import of multiple files fails after multiple imports. +o Import menu should be in directory pane instead of file pane. +o Need to be able to import into a directory in ProDOS. This will most + likely involve adding an interface indicating a (writable) directory. + This interface would be applied to both disks as well as file entries, + if appropriate. o Import file specification should only allow address editing if the filetype requires it. o Save does not allow the disk image location to be chosen for new images. (Maybe @@ -25,6 +35,8 @@ o Add RDOS writing capability. o Add Apple Pascal writing capability. o HDV disks are not always created to their full capacity. AppleCommander, however, assumes that the size of the disk on disk is the size of the disk. (Really!) + This is likely an issue because the ProDOS bitmap indicates there is a certain + amount of space and AppleCommander just assumes that the data exists. o Allow group assignments in import. Not really applicable now that datatype is chosen by file extension. o Provide a Swing GUI so people are not "limited" to SWT. This may be tossed.