From 88c866cfa8bfefb49eef08f29eb533e31e389890 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tomch Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:51:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Corrections to comments --- AppleWin/source/CPU.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/AppleWin/source/CPU.cpp b/AppleWin/source/CPU.cpp index 3e173896..fc30752d 100644 --- a/AppleWin/source/CPU.cpp +++ b/AppleWin/source/CPU.cpp @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA // . The exception is, what he calls "SKB" and "SKW" I call "NOP", // . for consistency's sake. Several other naming conventions exist. // . Of course, only the 6502 has illegal opcodes, the 65C02 doesn't. -// . Thus they're not emulated in Enhanced //e g_nAppMode. Games relying on them +// . Thus they're not emulated in Enhanced //e mode. Games relying on them // . don't run on a real Enhanced //e either. The old mixture of 65C02 // . emulation and skipping the right number of bytes for illegal 6502 // . opcodes, while working surprisingly well in practice, was IMHO @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA // // NB2. bSlowerOnPagecross can't be used for r/w detection, as these // . opcodes don't init this flag: -// . $EC CPX ABS (since there's no addressing g_nAppMode of CPY which has variable cycle number) +// . $EC CPX ABS (since there's no addressing mode of CPY which has variable cycle number) // . $CC CPY ABS (same) // // 65C02 info: