2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
There are two ways we could represent cycle information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. just have an array of cycles for each opcode + the adjustment for
|
|
|
|
page boundary crossing (which seems opcode-specific, oddly)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. add cycles in individual methods like those accessing memory and the
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
operations themselves, to model *why* something takes the cycles it does.
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer 2 on the grounds of it being more instructive but it assumes that
|
|
|
|
the way we do things is closely aligned to the way the 6502 is doing them
|
|
|
|
internally. Even if we end up having to do 1, I'd love to understand and
|
|
|
|
document some of the "why".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What follows is an attempt to "find the patterns" in the cycle times (as
|
|
|
|
given on http://www.6502.org/tutorials/6502opcodes.html )
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
NOTE: there appears to be an error in AND and ORA zero page timings on that
|
|
|
|
webpage given above. I've now corrected this below.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
There are 10 classes of instructions when it comes to cycle times:
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Class I
|
|
|
|
(followed by ADC, AND, BIT, CMP, CPX, CPY, EOR, LDA, LDX, LDY, ORA, SBC, STA,
|
|
|
|
STX, STY)
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
immediate 2
|
|
|
|
zero page 3
|
|
|
|
zero page, x 4
|
|
|
|
zero page, y 4
|
|
|
|
absolute 4
|
2011-08-15 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
absolute, x 4 (+1 if page crossed or writing)
|
|
|
|
absolute, y 4 (+1 if page crossed or writing)
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
indirect, x 6
|
2011-08-15 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
indirect, y 5 (+1 if page crossed or writing)
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1: the zero page indexed and x-index indirect don't have the page cross
|
|
|
|
addition because they wrap.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Note 2: writes to indexed non-zero-page memory (e.g. STA) have the +1 even
|
|
|
|
if not page crossing.
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class II
|
|
|
|
(followed by ASL, DEC, INC, LSR, ROL, ROR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
implied 2
|
|
|
|
zero page 5
|
|
|
|
zero page, x 6
|
|
|
|
absolute 6
|
|
|
|
absolute, x 7
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 01:50:55 +00:00
|
|
|
Note 3: these take 2 cycles longer than Class I because they involve a
|
|
|
|
read-modify-write. Because the absolute, x is a write to an indexed
|
|
|
|
non-zero-page memory location, there is an additional +1 even if not page
|
|
|
|
crossing (see Note 2)
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IIIa
|
|
|
|
(followed by CLC, CLD, CLI, CLV, DEX, DEY, INX, INY, NOP, SEC, SED, SEI, TAX,
|
|
|
|
TAY, TSX, TXA, TXS, TYA)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
implied 2
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IIIb
|
|
|
|
(followed by PHA, PHP)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
implied 3
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IIIc
|
|
|
|
(followed by PLA, PLP)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
implied 4
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IIId
|
|
|
|
(followed by RTI, RTS)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
implied 6
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IIIe
|
|
|
|
(followed by BRK)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
implied 7
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class IV
|
|
|
|
(followed by BCC, BCS, BEQ, BMI, BNE, BPL, BVC, BVS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
branch not taken 2
|
2011-08-15 03:45:10 +00:00
|
|
|
branch taken 3 (+1 if page crossed)
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class V
|
|
|
|
(followed by JMP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
absolute 3
|
|
|
|
indirect 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class VI
|
|
|
|
(followed by JSR)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 00:36:48 +00:00
|
|
|
absolute 6
|
2011-08-15 00:26:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-15 03:45:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This seems a possible implementation (not yet considering page boundaries):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. all instructions start with 2
|
|
|
|
2. absolute (including absolute indexed) adds 2
|
|
|
|
3. absolute indexed adds an additional 1 *if* instruction is of RMW type
|
|
|
|
4. zero page (including zero page indexed) adds 1
|
|
|
|
5. zero page indexed adds an addition 1
|
|
|
|
6. indirect (JMP) adds 4
|
|
|
|
7. indirect x adds 4
|
|
|
|
8. indirect y adds 3 plus an additional 1 *if* instruction is of RMW type
|
|
|
|
9. ASL, LSR, ROL, ROR add 2 cycles if not implied
|
|
|
|
10. JMP subtracts 1 cycle
|
|
|
|
11. JSR adds 2
|
|
|
|
12. RTS adds 4
|
|
|
|
13. branches add 1 if taken
|
|
|
|
14. DEC and INC add 2 cycles
|
|
|
|
15. PHA and PHP add 1 cycle
|
|
|
|
16. PLA and PLP add 2 cycles
|
|
|
|
17. BRK adds 5 cycles
|
|
|
|
18. RTI adds 4 cycles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMW instructions are the absolute,x of ASL, DEC, INC, LSR ROL, ROR and STA
|
|
|
|
as well as indirect,y and absolute,y of STA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may be possible to simplify even further given the particular functions
|
|
|
|
some of these share in command (where the cycle change could be placed
|
|
|
|
instead)
|