The correct values for LDBL_MAX and LDBL_MIN can now be provided, because we support long double constants. The other values are also updated to have more precision, so that they evaluate to bit-correct values in the long double format.
This includes:
*Functions operating on long long in <stdlib.h>
*Limits of long long types in <limits.h>
*64-bit types and limits (plus intmax_t and its limits) in <stdint.h>
*New format codes, plus functions operating on intmax_t, in <inttypes.h>
The new stuff is generally conditionalized to only be included if __ORCAC_HAS_LONG_LONG__ is defined, or if the implementation claims to be C99 or later. This allows the headers to remain usable with older versions of ORCA/C, or with any hypothetical "strict C89" mode that might be implemented in the future.
There still aren't prototypes for the main SANE calls, since they aren't really designed to be called directly from C, and may take variable numbers of parameters depending on the operation.
These had been the values appropriate for double, not accounting for the fact that long double is now the 80-bit extended type.
The integer LDBL_* values have now all been updated to be correct, as has LDBL_EPSILON. LDBL_MAX and LDBL_MIN are still not correct, because ORCA/C internally processes floating-point constants in the double format, and so the correct values would get rounded to INF and 0, respectively.
Note that the SANE 80-bit extended format is almost like the x87 80-bit extended format used for long double on many modern systems, but not entirely. The difference is that SANE allows the biased exponent field of an extended value (either normalized or denormalized) to be 0, yielding an effective exponent of 0-16383 = -16383. x87 uses an effective exponent of -16382 in these cases (which it considers to be pseudo-denormalized or denormalized), yielding values that are twice as large as the SANE values. This difference causes LDBL_MIN_EXP to be different, and would also cause LDBL_MIN to be different if it could be represented correctly.
*Use a typedef rather than a macro definition for va_list. (The C standards specify that va_list is a type, although this would make a practical difference only if someone #undef'd it.)
*Don't include a semicolon in va_start(), so it expands to an expression rather than a statement. This could make a difference in a construct like "if (...) va_start(...); else ...".
In order to work right, this needs either GNO's ORCALib (which already included isblank()) or a copy of ORCA's ORCALib with the corresponding patch applied.
It had been changed to reflect changes in the ORCALib code that added a second putback buffer element, but those changes were problematic and have been reverted for now. (It's also not clear if ORCALib binaries with the larger putback buffer were ever distributed--at the least, they aren't on Opus ][ or in any of the ORCA/C 2.2.0 beta releases.)
The macro was slightly broken in that its 'buf' argument might be evaluated twice. This could be a problem if it was, e.g., a call to an allocation function.
This is needed to ensure correct behavior in cases where the macro is bypassed to access the library function, e.g. by enclosing the function name in parentheses or by taking its address.
