Ron Yorston 0e056f7e9e ash: remove parsebackquote flag
Commit 503a0b8 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dash/dash.git
by Herbert Xu says:

  >The parsebackquote flag is only used in a test where it always has the
  >value zero.  So we can remove it altogether.

The first statement is incorrect:  parsebackquote is non-zero when
backquotes (as opposed to $(...)) are used for command substitution.
It is possible for the test to be executed with parsebackquote != 0 in
that case.

The test is question checks whether quotes have been closed, raising
the error "unterminated quoted string" if they haven't.  There seems
to be no good reason to allow unclosed quotes within backquotes.  Bash,
hush and dash (after commit 503a0b8) all treat the following as an error:

   XX=`"pwd`

whereas BusyBox ash doesn't.  It just ignores the unclosed quote and
executes pwd.

So, parsebackquote should be removed but not for the reason stated.

function                                             old     new   delta
parsebackquote                                         1       -      -1
readtoken1                                          3222    3182     -40
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-41)             Total: -41 bytes

Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@frippery.org>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
2015-07-13 03:50:27 +02:00
..
2015-07-13 03:50:27 +02:00
2010-01-25 13:39:24 +01:00
2009-03-19 23:09:58 +00:00
2015-07-13 03:50:27 +02:00
2015-07-13 03:25:46 +02:00
2014-11-20 01:43:30 +01:00
2013-02-26 00:36:53 +01:00
2010-05-20 12:56:14 +02:00

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7


http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap01.html
Shell & Utilities

It says that any of the standard utilities may be implemented
as a regular shell built-in. It gives a list of utilities which
are usually implemented that way (and some of them can only
be implemented as built-ins, like "alias"):

alias
bg
cd
command
false
fc
fg
getopts
jobs
kill
newgrp
pwd
read
true
umask
unalias
wait


http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
Shell Command Language

It says that shell must implement special built-ins. Special built-ins
differ from regular ones by the fact that variable assignments
done on special builtin are *PRESERVED*. That is,

VAR=VAL special_builtin; echo $VAR

should print VAL.

(Another distinction is that an error in special built-in should
abort the shell, but this is not such a critical difference,
and moreover, at least bash's "set" does not follow this rule,
which is even codified in autoconf configure logic now...)

List of special builtins:

. file
: [argument...]
break [n]
continue [n]
eval [argument...]
exec [command [argument...]]
exit [n]
export name[=word]...
export -p
readonly name[=word]...
readonly -p
return [n]
set [-abCefhmnuvx] [-o option] [argument...]
set [+abCefhmnuvx] [+o option] [argument...]
set -- [argument...]
set -o
set +o
shift [n]
times
trap n [condition...]
trap [action condition...]
unset [-fv] name...

In practice, no one uses this obscure feature - none of these builtins
gives any special reasons to play such dirty tricks.

However. This section also says that *function invocation* should act
similar to special built-in. That is, variable assignments
done on function invocation should be preserved after function invocation.

This is significant: it is not unthinkable to want to run a function
with some variables set to special values. But because of the above,
it does not work: variable will "leak" out of the function.