From 29d4d8837abf5839d5434660e00c085f4bb6756f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Helgeson Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:09:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Performance (markdown) --- Performance.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Performance.md b/Performance.md index 13a0817..701be6a 100644 --- a/Performance.md +++ b/Performance.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # TLDR -When using the BlueSCSI on a Vintage Mac you can expect about `1228KB/sec` read, `900KB/sec` write, `1ms` seek. Keep reading to see what factors may influence your speed. +When using the BlueSCSI on a Vintage Mac you can expect about `1.2MB/sec` read, `1.2MB/sec` write, `1ms` seek. Keep reading to see what factors may influence your speed. # Help us collect data @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Quality, name brand SD cards can provide a gain in performance over no name or f ## BluePill -The CH32 clone does benchmark slightly better than the STM32, though it is a very small difference. Other clones, fakes, etc show little to no difference. +The CKS32 clone does benchmark slightly better than the STM32, though it is a very small difference. Other clones, fakes, etc show little to no difference. ## Comparing to Spinning Disks