From 8821f7c9f23929a6b4a672233c10afcb7828d34d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PhrAx <68938882+phrax0@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 22:42:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Adding SN74ALS245A-1 to comparison table

---
 Transceiver-Comparison.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Transceiver-Comparison.md b/Transceiver-Comparison.md
index 2449034..4c0c362 100644
--- a/Transceiver-Comparison.md
+++ b/Transceiver-Comparison.md
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ The original RaSCSI uses the [SN74LS641](https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74l
 | Unsuitable | [74AHC245](https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/Nexperia-74AHCT245PW-118_C173388.pdf) |  [0.22](https://lcsc.com/product-detail/74-Series_Nexperia-74AHCT245PW-118_C173388.html) |  4 |  VCC is 5v. Datasheet reads input clamping current -20mA | 
 | Unsuitable | [SN74LS245DW](https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74ls245.pdf?HQS=TI-null-null-mousermode-df-pf-null-wwe&ts=1599280883179&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.mouser.ca%252F) | 1.34| 4 | Can only sink 24mA, SCSI protocol requires 48mA |
 | Unsuitable| [SN7406DRG4](https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn7406.pdf?HQS=TI-null-null-digikeymode-df-pf-null-wwe&ts=1599282149626)| 1.34 | 4 | Can only sink 40mA. Will require new layout and increase in chip count as it has less i/o than above. |
+| Potential Candidate | [SN74ALS245A-1](https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74als245a.pdf) | 1.49 | 4 | VCC 5v, -1 unit will sink 48mA |
 
 
 Note: as of 2020-08-04 the **SN74LS641-1** is the transceiver suggested when building the RaSCSI.