CAP/contrib/AppManager
mabam 743b427168 CAP 6.0 pl198 + asip1 2015-03-18 22:05:00 +01:00
..
Makefile CAP 6.0 pl198 + asip1 2015-03-18 22:05:00 +01:00
README CAP 6.0 pl198 + asip1 2015-03-18 22:05:00 +01:00
aufslock.c CAP 6.0 pl198 + asip1 2015-03-18 22:05:00 +01:00
aufsmon.c CAP 6.0 pl198 + asip1 2015-03-18 22:05:00 +01:00

README

Application Manager v1.0 - CAP 6.0
----------------------------------

The Application Manager controls the number of times an Application
may be run. This is most useful in restricting use to the number of legal
copies of software. The Application Manager uses a new argument to aufs:

	aufs -A <listname>

The file <listname> contains information of the format

/full/Path/To/Application1:N
/full/Path/To/Application2:M
/full/Path/To/Application3:O
...

where N/M/O are integers that specify the number of times that each
application may be run. The full path is to the DATA fork. If you
specify the character flag 'P' after the number, the file will be
protected from simple Finder copying.

EG:
/mac/servers/studeApplications/Word 4.0/Word:20P

limits Word to 20 simultaneous uses. The file cannot be Finder copied
(copy protection can be broken by a determined user, run control cannot).
NB: If the maximum run count is reached, file copying will fail, this is
independant of the state of the protection flag.

When the run limit is reached, a Mac user attempting to start the
Application receives a message which varies somewhat with system version ...

6.0.2	"The following application is busy or damaged
	<ApplicationName>."

6.0.5	"The file <ApplicationName> could not be
	opened/printed (the file/folder is locked)."

7.0	"The Application program <ApplicationName> could
	not be opened, because it is locked."

There is no need for extra software to be loaded onto the Mac, this is
strictly a UNIX AppleShare server modification. The basic functionality
for the Application Manager exists on SUN, ULTRIX and SGI machines. It is
known to not work under HP-UX.

The Application Manager is included in AUFS with the m4.features define
APPLICATION_MANAGER. This can be edited within Configure or edited into
an existing m4.features and 'gen.makes' rerun.

There are a couple of tools, 'aufsmon' which lists the files in <listname>
together with the number of time each is open, it can also optionally list
the process IDs of the running aufs'. The second is 'aufslock' which can be
used simply to add another lock from the UNIX end, it aids testing. It is
IMPORTANT to note that the filename specified to aufslock must be for the
resource fork, IE: include "/.resource/".

	aufsmon [-fpv] [-s N] <listname>

		-f	print a formfeed before each section
		-p	print the process IDs of the locking aufs
		-v	be verbose, print a 'bitmap' of the locks
		-s N	sleep for N seconds (default 10 seconds)
		<listname> is the same file provided to aufs with -A

	aufslock <filename> [ <byte> ]

		<filename> is the actual file (resource fork!!).
		<byte> is an optional numeric argument specifying the
			byte to lock, otherwise the next free is used.

Caveats
-------

The only major problem I have found is with TMON (2.8) and System 6.0.2 and
6.0.5. The machine simply bombs on locked applications. Removing TMON restores
normality. These are only 1 Mb machines so I suspect a memory problem.

A minor problem is due to a probable bug in the lockf() implementation
(SunOS only so far). Any aufs server that isn't running with the Application
Manager will see a block on the file if more than one other person and the
modified aufs has the application open. This could be seen as a feature.
You shouldn't be using two aufs servers on the same directory tree anyway!

NOTE CAREFULLY:
Locks are neither set nor checked if the aufs session has write permission
on the application resource fork. I recommend that once set up, write
permission for owner, group and other is removed from the application's
resource fork. Since the Application Manager works by using read locking
on the resource fork, copying or writing the application on a server with
the file in use is a no-no.

The AM uses fcntl(2) locking, see the manual entry for more information.