tenfourfox/layout/reftests/xul-document-load/readme.txt
Cameron Kaiser c9b2922b70 hello FPR
2017-04-19 00:56:45 -07:00

64 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext

This directory contains various XUL document (mozilla/dom/xul/document) testcases for reftest.
test001: Checks that stylesheets referenced from an overlay via an
xml-stylesheet PI are applied to the master document appropriately.
test002: Same as #1, but there's additional overlay between the master doc and
the overlay with the stylesheet.
test003: Checks that dynamically removing the stylesheet PI from an inline
script has expected effect.
test004: Same as test003, but removing the stylesheet PI happens from a "load"
event handler.
test005: Same as test003, but removing the stylesheet PI happens from a top-level
script in an external JS file.
test006: Simple <?xml-stylesheet ?> instruction in the prolog has an effect and exists
in the DOM.
test007: Same as #006 for xul-overlay PI.
test008: Handle stylesheet PIs pointing to nonexistent resources gracefully.
test009: Same as #008 for xul-overlay PIs
test010: PIs in the master document, outside the prolog, don't have any effect but get
added to the DOM.
test011: (bug 363406) Relative URIs in overlay's <?xml-stylesheet ?> PI are
resolved against overlay's URI, not the document URI.
test012: Tests that sheets references from <?xml-stylesheet ?> PIs are added to the
document in the same order as the PIs themselves are in - the simple case.
test013: Tests the same thing as #012, but for the case when the first sheet contains
an @import statement, which makes it -finish- loading earlier than the
second sheet.
test014: (bug 363406) Relative URIs in overlay's <?xul-overlay ?> PI are resolved
against overlay's URI, not the document URI.
test015: Relative URIs in overlay's <xul:script> are resolved against overlay's
URI, not the document URI.
test016: Non-XUL elements work in overlays.
test017: (bug 359959) <?xul-overlay ?> used as a direct child of <overlay>
should be inserted into the DOM, but not cause the overlay to be
applied.
test018: <?xul-overlay ?> used deep inside another overlay (i.e. as a child of
a 'hookup' node) should be inserted into the DOM, but not cause the
overlay to be applied.
test019: Same as #017 for <?xml-stylesheet ?>
test020: Same as #018 for <?xml-stylesheet ?>
test021: (bug 363419) Non-XUL elements directly underneath <overlay> should
be merged correctly into the base document.
test022: (bug 369828) <html:style> works in XUL documents