work around (fix?) the strange cross-segment refs that GNU ld generates when debug info is present

This commit is contained in:
Wolfgang Thaller 2021-05-24 16:19:17 +02:00
parent 74fc6d3995
commit 2abb66c0b7
1 changed files with 60 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -176,8 +176,51 @@ void Section::FixRelocs(bool allowDirectCodeRefs)
{
case SectionKind::code:
relocBase = RelocBase::code;
if(sym.needsJT && (exceptionInfoStart == 0 || rela.r_offset < exceptionInfoStart || sym.name == "__gxx_personality_v0"))
if(exceptionInfoStart != 0 && rela.r_offset >= exceptionInfoStart
&& sym.name != "__gxx_personality_v0")
{
// Case 1:
// references from .eh_frame, with the exception of __gcc_personality_v0.
// Should be direct references within the code segment.
if(sym.section.get() != this)
{
#if 0
std::cerr << "Warning: clearing cross-segment reference from .eh_frame:\n"
<< sym.name << " (" << name << "->" << sym.section->name << ")\n";
std::cerr << std::hex << (int)sym.st_info << " " << (int)sym.st_other << std::endl;
//assert(GELF_ST_BIND(sym.st_info) == STB_WEAK);
#endif
/*
ld behaves differently depending on whether debug info is present.
If debug info is present, .eh_frame sections will contain references
to other code segments, if no debug info is generated (or it is
stripped at link time), then these pointers are set to 0 during linking.
In most cases, this has to do with weak symbols; the instance of the
symbol that is removed gets a null ptr (with R_68K_NONE relocation) in
the .eh_frame section if there is no debug info, but gets remapped to
the surviving instance if there is debug info.
It also happens with some section symbols, and I *hope* this is related.
This makes no sense to me, but the reason is probably buried somewhere
within a 900-line function of C code within a 15000 line source file
in GNU bfd.
I *hope* that the correct behavior is to just clear those pointers.
*/
uint8_t *relocand = ((uint8_t*) data->d_buf + rela.r_offset - shdr.sh_addr);
relocand[0] = relocand[1] = relocand[2] = relocand[3] = 0;
rela.r_info = 0;
}
}
else if(sym.needsJT)
{
// Case 2: References to code that can go through the jump table.
// If we need an addend, that's a problem and we abort.
if(rela.r_addend == 0)
{
relocBase = RelocBase::jumptable;
@ -195,10 +238,21 @@ void Section::FixRelocs(bool allowDirectCodeRefs)
assert(sym.section.get() == this);
}
}
else if(!allowDirectCodeRefs)
else if(allowDirectCodeRefs)
{
// Case 3: Direct Code Refs are allowed (single-segment exectuable),
// We are happy. Nothing to check or do.
}
else
{
// Case 4: Multi-segment executable.
// Code references that don't go through the jump table
// must remain in the current segment.
if(sym.section.get() != this)
{
// Should never happen because symbols that are referenced from a different
// segment get their needsJT flag set (ScanRelocs and Obejct::MultiSegmentApp).
std::cerr << "Invalid ref from "
<< name << ":" << std::hex << rela.r_offset-shdr.sh_addr << std::dec
<< " to " << sym.section->name
@ -221,6 +275,10 @@ void Section::FixRelocs(bool allowDirectCodeRefs)
assert(false);
break;
}
if(!GELF_R_SYM(rela.r_info))
continue; // symboil reference has been cleared in Case 1 above
rela.relocBase = relocBase;
uint8_t *relocand = ((uint8_t*) data->d_buf + rela.r_offset - shdr.sh_addr);