Retro68/gcc/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/bk01pt03ch23s02.html
Wolfgang Thaller aaf905ce07 add gcc 4.70
2012-03-28 01:13:14 +02:00

60 lines
5.0 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Deprecated</title><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL-NS Stylesheets V1.76.1"/><meta name="keywords" content="&#10; ISO C++&#10; , &#10; library&#10; "/><meta name="keywords" content="&#10; ISO C++&#10; , &#10; runtime&#10; , &#10; library&#10; "/><link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="The GNU C++ Library"/><link rel="up" href="ext_containers.html" title="Chapter 23. HP/SGI Extensions"/><link rel="prev" href="ext_containers.html" title="Chapter 23. HP/SGI Extensions"/><link rel="next" href="ext_utilities.html" title="Chapter 24. Utilities"/></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Deprecated</th></tr><tr><td align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ext_containers.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 23. HP/SGI Extensions</th><td align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr/></div><div class="section" title="Deprecated"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title"><a id="manual.ext.containers.deprecated_sgi"/>Deprecated</h2></div></div></div><p>
The SGI hashing classes <code class="classname">hash_set</code> and
<code class="classname">hash_set</code> have been deprecated by the
unordered_set, unordered_multiset, unordered_map,
unordered_multimap containers in TR1 and C++11, and
may be removed in future releases.
</p><p>The SGI headers</p><pre class="programlisting">
&lt;hash_map&gt;
&lt;hash_set&gt;
&lt;rope&gt;
&lt;slist&gt;
&lt;rb_tree&gt;
</pre><p>are all here;
<code class="filename">&lt;backwards/hash_map&gt;</code> and
<code class="filename">&lt;backwards/hash_set&gt;</code>
are deprecated but available as backwards-compatible extensions,
as discussed further below.
<code class="filename">&lt;ext/rope&gt;</code> is the SGI
specialization for large strings ("rope," "large strings," get it? Love
that geeky humor.)
<code class="filename">&lt;ext/slist&gt;</code> (superseded in
C++11 by <code class="filename">&lt;forward_list&gt;</code>)
is a singly-linked list, for when the doubly-linked <code class="code">list&lt;&gt;</code>
is too much space overhead, and
<code class="filename">&lt;ext/rb_tree&gt;</code> exposes the
red-black tree classes used in the implementation of the standard maps
and sets.
</p><p>Each of the associative containers map, multimap, set, and multiset
have a counterpart which uses a
<a class="link" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/HashFunction.html">hashing
function</a> to do the arranging, instead of a strict weak ordering
function. The classes take as one of their template parameters a
function object that will return the hash value; by default, an
instantiation of
<a class="link" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/hash.html">hash</a>.
You should specialize this functor for your class, or define your own,
before trying to use one of the hashing classes.
</p><p>The hashing classes support all the usual associative container
functions, as well as some extra constructors specifying the number
of buckets, etc.
</p><p>Why would you want to use a hashing class instead of the
<span class="quote"><span class="quote">normal</span></span>implementations? Matt Austern writes:
</p><div class="blockquote"><blockquote class="blockquote"><p>
<span class="emphasis"><em>[W]ith a well chosen hash function, hash tables
generally provide much better average-case performance than
binary search trees, and much worse worst-case performance. So
if your implementation has hash_map, if you don't mind using
nonstandard components, and if you aren't scared about the
possibility of pathological cases, you'll probably get better
performance from hash_map.
</em></span>
</p></blockquote></div><p>
The deprecated hash tables are superseded by the standard unordered
associative containers defined in the ISO C++ 2011 standard in the
headers <code class="filename">&lt;unordered_map&gt;</code>
and <code class="filename">&lt;unordered_set&gt;</code>.
</p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr/><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ext_containers.html">Prev</a> </td><td align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="ext_containers.html">Up</a></td><td align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chapter 23. HP/SGI Extensions </td><td align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html">Home</a></td><td align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 24. Utilities</td></tr></table></div></body></html>